Suppr超能文献

基于聚类分析的灵长类动物脊髓丘脑束和躯体感觉丘脑神经元分类

Classification of primate spinothalamic and somatosensory thalamic neurons based on cluster analysis.

作者信息

Chung J M, Surmeier D J, Lee K H, Sorkin L S, Honda C N, Tsong Y, Willis W D

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug;56(2):308-27. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.2.308.

Abstract

Data analyzed in this study were derived from the responses of 128 spinothalamic tract (STT) cells and 110 thalamic neurons recorded in 75 anesthetized monkeys. A k-means cluster analysis, a nonhierarchical clustering technique, was performed using the relative magnitudes of responses to a graded series of innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli applied to the receptive field. For comparison, a parallel analysis was performed based on definitions of low-threshold (LT), wide dynamic range (WDR), and high-threshold (HT) cells used by our laboratory. For 128 STT cells, a classification scheme with three clusters was found statistically to be the best. This yielded groups of 22, 57, and 49 cells in clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cluster 1 cells were activated best by low-intensity mechanical stimuli, whereas cluster 3 cells were activated primarily by nociceptive stimuli. Cluster 2 cells had intermediate characteristics. When the classification scheme based on the cluster analysis was compared with the classification of the same neurons as LT, WDR, and HT cells, cluster 1 cells were divided into LT and WDR cells, whereas cluster 2 and 3 cells included WDR and HT cells. For 110 thalamic neurons, a classification scheme with five clusters was found statistically to be the best. Clusters 1-5 contained 25, 34, 17, 10, and 24 cells, respectively. Response characteristics of cells in each group indicated a gradual change in sensitivity to higher intensities of peripheral input from cluster 1 to 5. When this classification scheme was compared with the classification scheme previously used by our laboratory, cluster 1 cells belonged to the LT group, clusters 2 and 3 split into LT and WDR cells, and clusters 4 and 5 included WDR and HT cells. It is concluded that a classification scheme based on a cluster analysis of the responses of neurons to standardized stimuli may provide an objective and functionally meaningful way to categorize somatosensory neurons.

摘要

本研究分析的数据来自于对75只麻醉猴记录的128个脊髓丘脑束(STT)细胞和110个丘脑神经元的反应。使用对施加于感受野的一系列分级无害和有害机械刺激的反应相对幅度,进行了k均值聚类分析,这是一种非层次聚类技术。为作比较,根据本实验室使用的低阈值(LT)、广动力范围(WDR)和高阈值(HT)细胞的定义进行了平行分析。对于128个STT细胞,统计学上发现具有三个聚类的分类方案是最佳的。这分别在聚类1、2和3中产生了22、57和49个细胞组。聚类1细胞对低强度机械刺激反应最佳,而聚类3细胞主要由伤害性刺激激活。聚类2细胞具有中间特征。当将基于聚类分析的分类方案与将相同神经元分类为LT、WDR和HT细胞的分类进行比较时,聚类1细胞分为LT和WDR细胞,而聚类2和3细胞包括WDR和HT细胞。对于110个丘脑神经元,统计学上发现具有五个聚类的分类方案是最佳的。聚类1 - 5分别包含25、34、17、10和24个细胞。每组细胞的反应特征表明,从聚类1到5,对外周输入更高强度的敏感性逐渐变化。当将此分类方案与本实验室先前使用的分类方案进行比较时,聚类1细胞属于LT组,聚类2和3分为LT和WDR细胞,聚类4和5包括WDR和HT细胞。结论是,基于对神经元对标准化刺激反应的聚类分析的分类方案,可能为躯体感觉神经元的分类提供一种客观且具有功能意义的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验