Suppr超能文献

方案:基于学校的减少学校纪律性开除干预措施:一项更新的系统评价。

PROTOCOL: School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: An updated systematic review.

作者信息

Valdebenito Sara, Gaffney Hannah, Jolliffe Darrick

机构信息

Institute of Criminology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.

Clare Hall College University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 21;19(3):e1344. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1344. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

The primary goal of the present mixed methods review is to systematically examine the available evidence for the effectiveness of different types of school-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion. Quantitative evidence will help to understand the overall size of the impact, as well as the factors that better explain it. Qualitative evidence will help to better understand how these programmes may work, and what factors aid or hinder implementation and success. The research questions underlying the quantitative review are as follows: Do school-based programmes reduce the use of exclusionary sanctions in schools?Are some school-based approaches more effective than others in reducing exclusionary sanctions?Do participants' characteristics (e.g., age, sex, or ethnicity) affect the impact of school-based programmes on exclusionary sanctions in schools?Do characteristics of the interventions, implementation, and methodology affect the impact of school-based programmes on exclusionary sanctions in schools?Do school-based programmes have an impact on reducing the involvement of children and young people in crime and violence?Do participants' characteristics (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity) affect the impact of school-based programmes on crime and violence? If sufficient data are available, we will compare different approaches (e.g., school-wide management, classroom management, restorative justice, cognitive-behavioural interventions) and identify those that could potentially demonstrate larger effects. We will also (potentially) run analysis controlling for characteristics of (e.g., age, ethnicity, level of risk); (e.g., theoretical bases, components); (e.g., facilitators' training, doses, quality); and (e.g., research design). The research questions underlying the qualitative review are defined as follows: What are the barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions to reduce school exclusions?What are the barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions to reduce the involvement of children and young people in crime and violence?

摘要

本混合方法综述的主要目标是系统地审查不同类型的校内干预措施在减少学校纪律性开除方面有效性的现有证据。定量证据将有助于了解影响的总体规模,以及能更好解释该影响的因素。定性证据将有助于更好地理解这些项目可能如何发挥作用,以及哪些因素有助于或阻碍实施与成功。定量综述所依据的研究问题如下:校内项目是否减少了学校中开除性制裁的使用?在减少开除性制裁方面,某些校内方法是否比其他方法更有效?参与者的特征(如年龄、性别或种族)是否会影响校内项目对学校开除性制裁的影响?干预措施、实施过程和方法的特征是否会影响校内项目对学校开除性制裁的影响?校内项目在减少儿童和青少年犯罪及暴力行为的参与方面是否有影响?参与者的特征(如年龄、性别、种族)是否会影响校内项目对犯罪和暴力行为的影响?如果有足够的数据,我们将比较不同的方法(如全校管理、课堂管理、恢复性司法、认知行为干预),并确定那些可能显示出更大效果的方法。我们还将(可能)进行分析,控制以下特征:(如年龄、种族、风险水平);(如理论基础、组成部分);(如促进者培训、剂量、质量);以及(如研究设计)。定性综述所依据的研究问题定义如下:减少学校开除的干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素有哪些?减少儿童和青少年犯罪及暴力行为参与的干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素有哪些?

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Exclusionary School Discipline and Delinquent Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.排斥性学校纪律与不良行为后果:一项元分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Aug;50(8):1493-1509. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01459-3. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验