van Breukelen Natalie April
Biological Sciences, Goucher College, Towson, Maryland, USA.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Apr 10;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00177-22. eCollection 2023 Aug.
To improve students' scientific literacy, I designed a learning module that built upon my personal research experience and interest to actively engage students in reading primary literature. Here, I describe the scaffolded procedure in six steps, each linked to a learning outcome and assessment using Bloom's taxonomy as a framework of increasing from lower-order to higher-order cognition: (i) storytelling and discussion, i.e., remember; (ii) guided reading, i.e., understand; (iii) group reading, i.e., apply; (iv) shared reading, i.e., analyze; (v) self-selected reading, i.e., evaluate; and (vi) research proposal, i.e., create. By using my personal science story as introduction and foundation, students were able to connect to the content and consider the importance of the process of science. By providing a scaffolded introduction and guided support, students were able to read primary literature with less frustration and with greater confidence. I assessed these activities to determine if they increased student engagement and student confidence in reading peer-reviewed scientific papers. Students completed a survey rating their confidence reading scientific papers on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Reported confidence increased following the activities (mean of 1.9 before to 3.2 after) and activities were rated as helpful (mean of 3.1). These activities can be applied to most fields of research, allowing faculty at nonresearch institutions the opportunity to incorporate their research into teaching while achieving successful general education outcomes.
为提高学生的科学素养,我基于个人研究经验和兴趣设计了一个学习模块,以积极引导学生阅读原始文献。在此,我将分六个步骤描述这个逐步引导的过程,每个步骤都与一个学习成果和评估相关联,并以布鲁姆分类法作为从低阶认知到高阶认知递增的框架:(i)讲故事与讨论,即记忆;(ii)引导阅读,即理解;(iii)小组阅读,即应用;(iv)分享阅读,即分析;(v)自选阅读,即评价;(vi)研究提案,即创造。通过以我的个人科学故事作为引入和基础,学生能够与内容建立联系,并思考科学过程的重要性。通过提供逐步引导的介绍和指导支持,学生能够更轻松、更自信地阅读原始文献。我对这些活动进行了评估,以确定它们是否提高了学生的参与度以及学生阅读同行评审科学论文的信心。学生完成了一项调查,用1(完全没有)到4(极其有)的量表对他们阅读科学论文的信心进行评分。活动后报告的信心有所提高(从之前的平均1.9提高到之后的3.2),并且活动被评为有帮助(平均分为3.1)。这些活动可以应用于大多数研究领域,使非研究机构的教师有机会将他们的研究融入教学,同时实现成功的通识教育成果。