Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 23;84(5):22m14588. doi: 10.4088/JCP.22m14588.
Clozapine is the drug of choice indicated for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but delays in initiation and underutilization might have affected its effectiveness in practice. In this study, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of patients on clozapine treatment and if a delay in initiation was associated with poorer outcomes. This study was conducted at a tertiary mental health institution in patients aged 21 to 80 years from January 2016 to October 2019 who were on a stable dose of clozapine for 2 weeks. All patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for (SCID-I) to ascertain diagnoses of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Each patient was assessed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Social Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Past antipsychotic treatment trials were obtained from the medical records. Symptom remission status was defined using the PANSS symptom criteria proposed by Andreasen and colleagues in 2005. Functional remission was defined as a SOFAS score ≥ 60. A total of 159 individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited. The mean age of patients was 40.01 years, and the majority of patients were male (64.2%) and Chinese (85.5%). Thirty-seven patients (23.3%) achieved symptom remission, and 101 (63.5%) achieved functional remission. The median number of antipsychotic trials before clozapine initiation was 6 (interquartile range, 5-8). Patients in either symptom or functional remission had shorter time periods and fewer numbers of antipsychotic trials before first clozapine initiation. However, the trend was statistically significant only for median number of antipsychotic trials in the functional remission ( = .027) and symptom remission ( = .011) groups. Our study found a significant delay in the initiation of clozapine despite current guidelines indicating it for TRS. This delay might have contributed to the poorer clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to provide a clearer understanding of clozapine delay, evaluate its impact on outcomes, and find ways to improve access to clozapine.
氯氮平是治疗抵抗性精神分裂症(TRS)的首选药物,但启动延迟和利用不足可能影响了其在实践中的效果。在这项研究中,我们试图检查接受氯氮平治疗的患者的临床结果,以及启动延迟是否与较差的结果相关。
这项研究是在 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月期间在一家三级精神卫生机构进行的,纳入年龄在 21 至 80 岁之间的患者,他们服用稳定剂量的氯氮平 2 周。所有患者均使用精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍的结构临床访谈 (SCID-I) 进行评估。每位患者均使用阳性和阴性综合征量表 (PANSS) 和社会职业功能评估量表 (SOFAS) 进行评估。过去的抗精神病治疗试验从病历中获得。症状缓解状态使用 Andreasen 及其同事在 2005 年提出的 PANSS 症状标准定义。功能缓解定义为 SOFAS 评分≥60。
共纳入 159 例精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍患者。患者的平均年龄为 40.01 岁,大多数患者为男性 (64.2%) 和中国人 (85.5%)。37 例 (23.3%) 达到症状缓解,101 例 (63.5%) 达到功能缓解。氯氮平起始前抗精神病药物试验的中位数为 6 次 (四分位距,5-8 次)。在症状或功能缓解的患者中,氯氮平起始前的时间周期和抗精神病药物试验的数量更短。然而,仅在功能缓解 ( = .027) 和症状缓解 ( = .011) 组的中位数抗精神病药物试验数量方面,这种趋势具有统计学意义。
我们的研究发现,尽管目前的指南表明氯氮平适用于 TRS,但氯氮平的启动仍存在显著延迟。这种延迟可能导致了更差的临床结果。需要进一步研究,以更清楚地了解氯氮平的延迟,评估其对结果的影响,并找到改善氯氮平获得途径的方法。