Institute of Eco-Environmental Forensics, Shandong University, 266237, Qingdao, China.
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, 130012, Changchun, China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118806. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118806. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
Promotion of energy-saving household appliances (ESHAs) potentially contributes to optimizing both the total quantity and efficiency of household energy consumption. Differences in urban consumers' preference for higher-grade ESHAs as well as its influencing factors in cities with hierarchical socioeconomic levels remain elusive. Targeting 55 Chinese cities pertaining to three levels of socioeconomic development, we distribute questionnaires designed to cover both demographic and consciousness factors. By combining Contingent Valuation Method and multiple linear regression, the extra willingness to pay (WTP) for Grade-1/2 appliances compared with Grade-3 appliances is measured, and the influence factors on the WTP as well as consumers with highest WTP are identified. The extra WTP for Grade-1 appliances in First-, Second- and Third-level cities is 44.1%, 42.3% and 32.7%, respectively. The influences of age, household income, having children or not and monthly electricity bill parallel the socioeconomic level, while gender and schooling affect differently across socioeconomic levels. Consumers in less developed cities focus more on their affordability for the ESHAs, and in more developed cities have better environmental consciousness. Subsidies for consumers, such as those having master degree or above in First-level and Second-level cities, and having children in Third-level cities will increase their WTP. The findings provide insights for policy interventions aimed at boosting the purchase behavior for ESHAs according to local conditions for control of both household energy consumption and carbon emissions.
推广节能家电(ESHAs)有可能优化家庭能源消费的总量和效率。在社会经济层次不同的城市中,城市消费者对更高档次 ESHAs 的偏好差异及其影响因素仍不明确。针对三个社会经济发展层次的 55 个中国城市,我们分发了涵盖人口统计和意识因素的问卷。通过结合条件价值评估法和多元线性回归,我们衡量了与 3 级相比,消费者对 1/2 级电器的额外支付意愿(WTP),并确定了影响 WTP 的因素以及具有最高 WTP 的消费者。在一、二、三级城市中,对 1 级电器的额外 WTP 分别为 44.1%、42.3%和 32.7%。年龄、家庭收入、是否有孩子和每月电费等因素与社会经济水平平行,而性别和受教育程度在不同的社会经济水平上有不同的影响。欠发达城市的消费者更关注他们对 ESHAs 的支付能力,而在更发达的城市,消费者的环保意识更强。对消费者的补贴,如在一、二级城市拥有硕士或以上学历的消费者,以及在三级城市有孩子的消费者,将增加他们的 WTP。这些发现为根据当地情况促进 ESHAs 的购买行为提供了政策干预的见解,以控制家庭能源消耗和碳排放。