• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗服务碎片化:重症监护和初级保健之间的差距及改进机会

Fragmentation of care between intensive and primary care settings and opportunities for improvement.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Thorax. 2023 Dec;78(12):1181-1187. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220387. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1136/thorax-2023-220387
PMID:37620046
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the gaps in care provided across the transitions from the intensive care unit (ICU) to primary care, in order to improve post-ICU care.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews with three participant groups: intensivists, general practitioners (GPs) and patients and carers with framework analysis of textual data were used to investigate experiences of transitions of care post-ICU. Participants were purposively sampled for diversity. Eligible patients were adults, mechanically ventilated for >24 hours, with access to a video-enabled device. Exclusion criteria were non-English speaking and any cognitive/neurological limitation precluding interview participation.

RESULTS

A total of 46 interviews (15 patients, 8 caregivers, 15 intensivists and 8 GPs) were completed. Eight themes were identified, and categorised into three healthcare tiers. : (1) fragmentation of care; (2) communication gaps; (3) limited awareness and recognition of issues beyond the ICU; (4) lack of a specialised ICU follow-up pathway; : (5) relationships among ICU, hospitals, GPs and patients and carers; (6) need for clinician role definition and clarity in ICU follow-up; : (7) patient autonomy and self-actualisation and (8) the evolving caregiver role. A conceptual model was developed, highlighting bidirectional feedback loops between hospital and primary care.

CONCLUSION

This study identified gaps in care between ICU discharge and reintegration with primary care from the lived experience of patients, caregivers, intensivists and GPs. These data provide foci for future interventional research to improve the integration of care for this vulnerable and underserved cohort.

摘要

目的

探讨从重症监护病房(ICU)到初级保健的过渡过程中护理的差距,以改善 ICU 后的护理。

方法

采用半结构式访谈,对三组参与者进行访谈:重症监护医师、全科医生(GP)和患者及护理人员,并对文本数据进行框架分析,以调查 ICU 后护理过渡的经验。参与者是根据多样性进行有目的抽样的。合格的患者为成人,机械通气>24 小时,可使用视频设备。排除标准为非英语使用者和任何认知/神经限制妨碍访谈参与。

结果

共完成 46 次访谈(15 名患者、8 名护理人员、15 名重症监护医师和 8 名全科医生)。确定了 8 个主题,并分为三个医疗保健层次。(1)护理碎片化;(2)沟通差距;(3)对 ICU 以外问题的认识和认识有限;(4)缺乏专门的 ICU 随访途径;(5)ICU、医院、GP 和患者及护理人员之间的关系;(6)需要明确界定临床医生的角色和 ICU 随访的明确性;(7)患者的自主性和自我实现;(8)护理人员角色的演变。开发了一个概念模型,突出了医院和初级保健之间的双向反馈循环。

结论

这项研究从患者、护理人员、重症监护医师和全科医生的亲身体验中确定了 ICU 出院后与初级保健重新融合过程中护理的差距。这些数据为未来改善这一脆弱和服务不足群体的护理整合的干预性研究提供了重点。

相似文献

1
Fragmentation of care between intensive and primary care settings and opportunities for improvement.医疗服务碎片化:重症监护和初级保健之间的差距及改进机会
Thorax. 2023 Dec;78(12):1181-1187. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220387. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Clinician- and Patient-Identified Solutions to Reduce the Fragmentation of Post-ICU Care in Australia.临床医生和患者确定的解决方案,以减少澳大利亚 ICU 后护理的碎片化。
Chest. 2024 Jul;166(1):95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from intensive care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic's first wave.重症 COVID-19 患者出院后的支持和随访需求:大流行第一波期间英国全科医生和重症监护医护人员观点的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e048392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048392.
4
Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study.重症监护医生报告的与重症监护病房替代决策者讨论出院后结局的促进因素和障碍。一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Sep;13(9):1546-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-212OC.
5
Patient and caregiver experiences with a telemedicine intensive care unit recovery clinic.患者和护理人员对远程医疗重症监护病房康复诊所的体验。
Heart Lung. 2023 Mar-Apr;58:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Therapeutic Alliance between the Caregivers of Critical Illness Survivors and Intensive Care Unit Clinicians.危重症幸存者照顾者与重症监护病房临床医生之间的治疗联盟。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Nov;12(11):1646-53. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-408OC.
7
Patient and carer experience of hospital-based rehabilitation from intensive care to hospital discharge: mixed methods process evaluation of the RECOVER randomised clinical trial.从重症监护到出院的医院康复患者及护理人员体验:RECOVER随机临床试验的混合方法过程评估
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 1;6(8):e012041. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012041.
8
Mixed-methods study examining family carers' perceptions of the relationship between intrahospital transitions and patient readiness for discharge.混合方法研究考察了家庭护理者对医院内转科与患者出院准备程度之间关系的看法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Aug;32(8):447-456. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015120. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
Medication issues experienced by patients and carers after discharge from the intensive care unit.患者和照护者在重症监护病房出院后的用药问题。
J Crit Care. 2013 Feb;28(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Changing support needs of survivors of complex critical illness and their family caregivers across the care continuum: a qualitative pilot study of Towards RECOVER.复杂危重症幸存者及其家庭照顾者在整个护理连续过程中不断变化的支持需求:迈向康复(Towards RECOVER)的定性试点研究
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-State Travel for Cancer Care and Implications for Telehealth Reciprocity.癌症护理的跨州就医及远程医疗互惠的影响
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461021. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61021.
2
Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.设计院后干预措施以支持危重症康复时需考虑的因素:系统评价与定性证据综合分析
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):80-95. doi: 10.1177/17511437241308674. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
The interactivity and independence of Recovery challenges and coping strategies for ICU survivors and their caregivers: a systematic review and Meta-synthesis.
重症监护病房幸存者及其照顾者康复挑战与应对策略的交互性和独立性:一项系统综述与元整合分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02542-3.
4
Ideal Postdischarge Follow-Up After Severe Pneumonia or Acute Respiratory Failure: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians in Diverse Settings.重症肺炎或急性呼吸衰竭后的理想出院后随访:对不同环境下基层医疗临床医生的定性研究
CHEST Crit Care. 2024 Sep;2(3). doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100079. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Fragmentation of care in breast cancer: greater than the sum of its parts.乳腺癌的治疗碎片化:各部分之和大于整体。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Dec;208(3):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07442-3. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
6
Prediction of Post-ICU Impairments-Is It Possible?ICU 后功能障碍预测——是否可能?
Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;52(2):337-340. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006082. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Do critical illness survivors with multimorbidity need a different model of care?多发病共存的危重症幸存者是否需要不同的护理模式?
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 8;27(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04770-6.