Centre for Experimental Medicine, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 8;27(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04770-6.
There is currently a lack of evidence on the optimal strategy to support patient recovery after critical illness. Previous research has largely focussed on rehabilitation interventions which aimed to address physical, psychological, and cognitive functional sequelae, the majority of which have failed to demonstrate benefit for the selected outcomes in clinical trials. It is increasingly recognised that a person's existing health status, and in particular multimorbidity (usually defined as two or more medical conditions) and frailty, are strongly associated with their long-term outcomes after critical illness. Recent evidence indicates the existence of a distinct subgroup of critical illness survivors with multimorbidity and high healthcare utilisation, whose prior health trajectory is a better predictor of long-term outcomes than the severity of their acute illness. This review examines the complex relationships between multimorbidity and patient outcomes after critical illness, which are likely mediated by a range of factors including the number, severity, and modifiability of a person's medical conditions, as well as related factors including treatment burden, functional status, healthcare delivery, and social support. We explore potential strategies to optimise patient recovery after critical illness in the presence of multimorbidity. A comprehensive and individualized approach is likely necessary including close coordination among healthcare providers, medication reconciliation and management, and addressing the physical, psychological, and social aspects of recovery. Providing patient-centred care that proactively identifies critical illness survivors with multimorbidity and accounts for their unique challenges and needs is likely crucial to facilitate recovery and improve outcomes.
目前,关于如何支持重病患者康复的最佳策略,还缺乏证据。先前的研究主要集中在康复干预上,旨在解决身体、心理和认知功能的后遗症,但大多数干预措施在临床试验中未能证明对选定结果有益。人们越来越认识到,一个人的现有健康状况,特别是多种并存疾病(通常定义为两种或多种疾病)和虚弱状况,与他们在重病后的长期结果密切相关。最近的证据表明,在重病幸存者中存在一个明显的亚组,他们患有多种并存疾病且医疗保健利用率高,他们以前的健康轨迹比其急性疾病的严重程度更能预测长期结果。这篇综述考察了多种并存疾病与重病后患者结果之间的复杂关系,这些关系可能受到多种因素的影响,包括一个人疾病的数量、严重程度和可改变性,以及相关因素,包括治疗负担、功能状态、医疗保健提供和社会支持。我们探讨了在存在多种并存疾病的情况下优化重病患者康复的潜在策略。一种全面和个体化的方法可能是必要的,包括医疗服务提供者之间的密切协调、药物调整和管理,以及解决恢复的身体、心理和社会方面。提供以患者为中心的护理,主动识别患有多种并存疾病的重病幸存者,并考虑到他们独特的挑战和需求,对于促进康复和改善结果可能至关重要。
Anesth Analg. 2019-4
Intensive Care Med. 2025-8-12
Anaesthesiologie. 2025-1
Crit Care Resusc. 2024-6-28
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024-2-1
JAMA Intern Med. 2023-7-1
Cell. 2023-1-19
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022-7-15
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022-7-14
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022-5-29