• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在医学影像中的伦理考量:部署与治理。

Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Deployment and Governance.

机构信息

Department of Health Humanities and Bioethics and Department of Philosophy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

Department of Bioethics, Hospital for Sick Children, and Dana Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2023 Oct;64(10):1509-1515. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266110. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

DOI:10.2967/jnumed.123.266110
PMID:37620051
Abstract

The deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to make nuclear medicine and medical imaging faster, cheaper, and both more effective and more accessible. This is possible, however, only if clinicians and patients feel that these AI medical devices (AIMDs) are trustworthy. Highlighting the need to ensure health justice by fairly distributing benefits and burdens while respecting individual patients' rights, the AI Task Force of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging has identified 4 major ethical risks that arise during the deployment of AIMD: autonomy of patients and clinicians, transparency of clinical performance and limitations, fairness toward marginalized populations, and accountability of physicians and developers. We provide preliminary recommendations for governing these ethical risks to realize the promise of AIMD for patients and populations.

摘要

人工智能(AI)的应用有可能使核医学和医学成像更快、更便宜、更有效、更普及。然而,只有临床医生和患者认为这些人工智能医疗设备(AIMD)值得信赖,这才有可能。核医学和分子成像学会的人工智能工作组强调,有必要通过公平分配利益和负担,同时尊重个体患者的权利,以确保健康公正,该工作组确定了在部署 AIMD 期间出现的 4 大主要伦理风险:患者和临床医生的自主性、临床性能和局限性的透明度、边缘化人群的公平性以及医生和开发者的问责制。我们提供了初步的建议,以管理这些伦理风险,实现 AIMD 为患者和人群带来的承诺。

相似文献

1
Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Deployment and Governance.人工智能在医学影像中的伦理考量:部署与治理。
J Nucl Med. 2023 Oct;64(10):1509-1515. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266110. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Data Collection, Development, and Evaluation.医学成像人工智能的伦理考量:数据采集、开发与评估。
J Nucl Med. 2023 Dec 1;64(12):1848-1854. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266080.
3
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
4
Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine.人工智能在核医学中的伦理和法律挑战。
Semin Nucl Med. 2021 Mar;51(2):120-125. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem.人工智能在核医学中的应用:迈向值得信赖的生态系统的机遇、挑战和责任。
J Nucl Med. 2023 Feb;64(2):188-196. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263703. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
7
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence.可信医疗人工智能的伦理与治理。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9.
8
"Just" accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations.仅仅是“准确性”吗?程序公平性要求在基于人工智能的医疗资源分配中具备可解释性。
AI Soc. 2022 Dec 21:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01614-9.
9
Defining AMIA's artificial intelligence principles.定义 AMIA 的人工智能原则。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):585-591. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac006.
10
A trustworthy AI reality-check: the lack of transparency of artificial intelligence products in healthcare.值得信赖的人工智能事实核查:医疗保健领域人工智能产品缺乏透明度
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 20;6:1267290. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1267290. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Landscape, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.心血管成像中的人工智能:现状、临床影响及未来方向。
Discoveries (Craiova). 2025 Jun 30;13(1):e211. doi: 10.15190/d.2025.10. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
A decade of review in global regulation and research of artificial intelligence medical devices (2015-2025).全球人工智能医疗设备监管与研究十年回顾(2015 - 2025年)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;12:1630408. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1630408. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging.
患者对医学影像中人工智能的看法。
J Particip Med. 2025 Jul 28;17:e67816. doi: 10.2196/67816.
4
[Analysis of the global registration status of clinical trials for artificial intelligence medical device].[人工智能医疗器械临床试验全球注册状况分析]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 25;42(3):512-519. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202408035.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic and Ultrasound Imaging for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.用于炎症性肠病的内镜和超声成像中的人工智能
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 16;14(12):4291. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124291.
6
Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Lung Cancer Recurrence: A Gene Biomarker-Driven Review.人工智能模型在预测肺癌复发中的有效性:基于基因生物标志物的综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 5;17(11):1892. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111892.
7
AI-Powered Object Detection in Radiology: Current Models, Challenges, and Future Direction.放射学中的人工智能驱动目标检测:当前模型、挑战与未来方向。
J Imaging. 2025 Apr 30;11(5):141. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11050141.
8
Artificial Intelligence-Based Software as a Medical Device (AI-SaMD): A Systematic Review.基于人工智能的软件作为医疗器械(AI-SaMD):一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;13(7):817. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070817.
9
Using statistical modelling and machine learning in detecting bone properties: A systematic review protocol.利用统计建模和机器学习检测骨特性:一项系统综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 11;20(3):e0319583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319583. eCollection 2025.
10
On the practical, ethical, and legal necessity of clinical Artificial Intelligence explainability: an examination of key arguments.论临床人工智能可解释性的实践、伦理和法律必要性:关键论点审视
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02891-2.