• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在综合医疗体系中实施和审查护理生态系统。

Implementation and review of the care ecosystem in an integrated healthcare system.

机构信息

HealthPartners Center for Memory & Aging, St. Paul, MN, USA.

HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04146-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-023-04146-z
PMID:37620780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The University of California, San Francisco Memory and Aging Center (UCSF-MAC) led the development and tested a collaborative care model delivered by lay care team navigators (CTNs) with support from a multidisciplinary team known as the Care Ecosystem (CE). We evaluated outcomes related to the feasibility of the CE in a non-academic healthcare system, including acceptability, adoption, and fidelity to the original UCSF model.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The CE team at HealthPartners consisted of two CTNs, a social worker, an RN, a program coordinator, and a behavioral neurologist. Intake forms were developed to collect demographic, baseline, and annual data at one year related to dementia severity and caregiver status. Experience surveys were completed at 6 and 12 months by participating caregivers. All data was entered into REDCap.

RESULTS

A total of 570 PWD-caregiver dyads were recruited into the CE: 53% PWDs female, average age 75.2 ± 9.43, 19% living within rural communities. Of the 173 dyads assessed at one year, 30% responded to the annual intake forms and 58% of responded to experience surveys. At one year, PWDs progressed in disease severity and functional impairment, although caregiver burden and mood remained unchanged. We observed a significant reduction in caregiver reported emotional challenges associated with caregiving, sleep problems, and obtaining caregiver help at one year. 86% of caregivers reported feeling supported by their CTN nearly always or quite frequently, and 88% rated the CTN as highly responsive to what was important to them.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The CE was feasible and well-received within a non-academic healthcare system.

摘要

背景与目的

加州大学旧金山分校记忆与衰老中心(UCSF-MAC)领导开发并测试了一种协作式护理模式,由外行护理团队导航员(CTN)提供,得到了一个称为护理生态系统(CE)的多学科团队的支持。我们评估了 CE 在非学术医疗系统中与可行性相关的结果,包括可接受性、采用率和对原始 UCSF 模型的保真度。

研究设计与方法

HealthPartners 的 CE 团队由两名 CTN、一名社工、一名注册护士、一名项目协调员和一名行为神经学家组成。我们制定了入组表格,以收集一年时与痴呆严重程度和照护者状况相关的人口统计学、基线和年度数据。参与照护者在 6 个月和 12 个月时完成经验调查。所有数据均输入 REDCap。

结果

CE 共招募了 570 名 PWD-照护者对:53%的 PWD 为女性,平均年龄 75.2±9.43 岁,19%居住在农村社区。在 173 名接受一年评估的患者中,30%完成了年度入组表格,58%完成了经验调查。一年时,PWD 的疾病严重程度和功能障碍有所进展,尽管照护者负担和情绪保持不变。我们观察到,照护者报告的与照护相关的情绪挑战、睡眠问题和获得照护帮助方面的问题在一年时显著减少。86%的照护者报告称他们的 CTN 几乎总是或经常给予他们支持,88%的照护者认为 CTN 对他们重要的事情反应迅速。

讨论与意义

CE 在非学术医疗系统中是可行且受欢迎的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/38f9bb6bd2d0/12877_2023_4146_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/79e02c88a2f1/12877_2023_4146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/068317c08960/12877_2023_4146_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/9f4a6b77025b/12877_2023_4146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/38f9bb6bd2d0/12877_2023_4146_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/79e02c88a2f1/12877_2023_4146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/068317c08960/12877_2023_4146_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/9f4a6b77025b/12877_2023_4146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d129/10464398/38f9bb6bd2d0/12877_2023_4146_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation and review of the care ecosystem in an integrated healthcare system.在综合医疗体系中实施和审查护理生态系统。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04146-z.
2
Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.电话和互联网协作式痴呆护理对生活质量、照顾者幸福感和医疗保健利用的影响:护理生态系统随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.
3
Responding to the Needs of Persons Living With Dementia and Their Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons From the Care Ecosystem.在新冠疫情期间满足痴呆症患者及其照护者的需求:照护生态系统的经验教训
Innov Aging. 2022 Feb 26;6(2):igac007. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac007. eCollection 2022.
4
Variations in Costs of a Collaborative Care Model for Dementia.协作式痴呆护理模式的成本变化。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Dec;67(12):2628-2633. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16076. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
FAMILIES: an effective healthcare intervention for caregivers of community dwelling people living with dementia.家庭:一种针对社区居住的痴呆症患者照顾者的有效医疗干预措施。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Oct;24(10):1700-1708. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1647141. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Translating an Evidence-based Multicomponent Intervention for Older Adults With Dementia and Caregivers.翻译基于循证的多组分干预措施,用于患有痴呆症的老年人及其照护者。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):548-557. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny122.
7
[Effects of Multicomponent Case Management on the Problem Behaviors of Patients With Dementia and Family Caregivers' Distress, Self-Efficacy, Depression, Burden and Health Promotion Behaviors].[多组分病例管理对痴呆患者问题行为及家庭照顾者困扰、自我效能感、抑郁、负担和健康促进行为的影响]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2022 Oct;69(5):68-85. doi: 10.6224/JN.202210_69(5).09.
8
Predictors of self- and caregiver-rated quality of life for people with dementia living in the community and in nursing homes in northern Taiwan.预测居住在台湾北部社区和养老院的痴呆症患者的自我和护理人员生活质量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 May;27(5):825-36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002506. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
9
Psychological well-being over time among informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia living at home.长期居家照顾痴呆患者的非正式照护者的心理健康状况。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Nov;21(11):1138-1146. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1211621. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
The Role of Care Navigators Working with People with Dementia and Their Caregivers.照顾导航员在与痴呆症患者及其照护者合作中的作用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(1):45-55. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180957.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissemination of the Care Ecosystem Collaborative Care Model for Dementia.痴呆症护理生态系统协作护理模式的推广。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19363.
2
Mapping the evidence on dementia care pathways - A scoping review.绘制痴呆症护理路径的证据图谱-范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05250-4.
3
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2024 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of collaborative dementia care on potentially inappropriate medication use: Outcomes from the Care Ecosystem randomized clinical trial.协同痴呆护理对潜在不适当药物使用的影响:来自 Care Ecosystem 随机临床试验的结果。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 May;19(5):1865-1875. doi: 10.1002/alz.12808. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
2
2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2021 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Mar;17(3):327-406. doi: 10.1002/alz.12328. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3708-3821. doi: 10.1002/alz.13809. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
电话和互联网协作式痴呆护理对生活质量、照顾者幸福感和医疗保健利用的影响:护理生态系统随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.
4
Brief version of Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) for burden assessment in older caregivers.用于评估老年照料者负担的 Zarit 负担访谈(ZBI)简版。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):122-129. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-010015.
5
Association of incident dementia with hospitalizations.痴呆症与住院的关联。
JAMA. 2012 Jan 11;307(2):165-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1964.
6
Utility of the functional activities questionnaire for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from very mild Alzheimer disease.功能活动问卷在区分轻度认知障碍与极轻度阿尔茨海默病中的效用。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010 Oct-Dec;24(4):348-53. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181e2fc84.
7
Caring for patients with dementia: how good is the quality of care? Results from three health systems.照顾痴呆症患者:护理质量如何?来自三个医疗系统的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Aug;55(8):1260-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01249.x.
8
Advance directives for health care and research: prevalence and correlates.医疗保健与研究的预先指示:患病率及相关因素
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2003 Oct-Dec;17(4):215-22. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200310000-00004.
9
The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.PHQ-9:一种简短抑郁严重程度测量工具的效度
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
10
Performance of the dementia severity rating scale: a caregiver questionnaire for rating severity in Alzheimer disease.痴呆严重程度评定量表的性能:一份用于评估阿尔茨海默病严重程度的照料者问卷。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1996 Spring;10(1):31-9.