World Vision International, Global Educator Sector Team, Yerevan, Armenia.
World Vision International, Rwanda Office, Kigali, Rwanda.
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04239-z.
The study objective was to determine if a nurturing care parenting intervention delivered in a humanitarian setting in Rwanda would benefit early development, learning, and care outcomes for young children under five years and their caregivers compared to standard care.
Rwanda's Mugombwa, Kansi, and Kigeme refugee camps and host communities implemented the parenting program. Via a quasi-experimental research design, the study assessed the effects of intervention delivered as a high dose (HD: 12 group sessions and four home visits) or low dose (LD: 6 group sessions and two home visits) on child and caregiver outcomes compared to the control group from similar settings receiving standard care. The Ages and Stages Questionnaires-3 (ASQ-3) assessed child development outcomes. The Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey questionnaire assessed parenting practices concerning early learning and stimulation.
The assessment included 733 children and families in total: HD = 314, LD = 240, control = 179. The researchers found no significant difference in child development scores between the intervention and control groups. Significantly higher proportion of caregivers exposed to HD and LD packages had engaged in early learning and stimulation practices compared to the control group, respectively, with 211(67.2%), 148 (61.7%) vs. 66 (36.9%), p < 0.001 caregivers engaged in 4 or more activities in the past three days. Similarly, on responsive feeding items, a higher percentage of HD and LD group caregivers were engaged in positive behaviours compared to the control group: 164 (52.2%), 108 (45%) vs. 62 (34.6%), p = 0.001. The study found no difference between the study arms regarding caregiver mental health.
Parenting programmes in humanitarian settings can improve nurturing care practices, even with a low dose, which is essential to strengthening children's resilience in at-risk conditions. Further studies in humanitarian contexts are crucial to understand the implementation needs in sensitive contexts.
本研究旨在确定在卢旺达的人道主义环境中实施养育护理养育干预是否会使五岁以下的幼儿及其照顾者在早期发展、学习和护理方面受益,与标准护理相比。
卢旺达的 Mugombwa、Kansi 和 Kigeme 难民营和收容社区实施了养育计划。通过准实验研究设计,该研究评估了高剂量(HD:12 个小组会议和 4 次家访)或低剂量(LD:6 个小组会议和 2 次家访)干预与接受标准护理的类似环境中的对照组相比对儿童和照顾者结果的影响。年龄和阶段问卷-3(ASQ-3)评估了儿童的发展结果。多指标群集调查问卷评估了与早期学习和刺激有关的养育实践。
评估共包括 733 名儿童和家庭:HD=314,LD=240,对照组=179。研究人员发现干预组和对照组儿童的发育评分没有显著差异。与对照组相比,接触 HD 和 LD 方案的照顾者参与早期学习和刺激实践的比例显著更高,分别有 211(67.2%)、148(61.7%)和 66(36.9%),p<0.001 在过去三天中进行了 4 项或更多活动。同样,在反应性喂养项目中,HD 和 LD 组的照顾者表现出更多的积极行为,与对照组相比:164(52.2%)、108(45%)和 62(34.6%),p=0.001。研究组之间在照顾者心理健康方面没有差异。
即使是低剂量,人道主义环境中的育儿计划也可以改善养育护理实践,这对于增强儿童在高风险条件下的适应能力至关重要。在人道主义背景下进行进一步研究对于了解敏感环境下的实施需求至关重要。