Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Alliance for Human Development, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;9:671988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.671988. eCollection 2021.
Over 250 million children in low- and middle-income countries are at risk of not achieving their fullest developmental potential due to co-occurring risks such as poor nutrition and inadequate learning opportunities. Early intervention programs integrating the aspects of nurturing care, that is, good health, adequate nutrition, safety and security, responsive caregiving, and learning opportunities, may ameliorate against the negative impact of these adverse conditions. This meta-analytic review updates the evidence base of parenting interventions comprising stimulation and responsive caregiving components on developmental outcomes for children under age 2 years in low- and middle-income countries. It also describes and assesses the moderation effects of population characteristics and implementation features on the intervention effectiveness. Studies were identified based on previous systematic reviews and an updated literature search in eight databases and the gray literature up to December 2020. A random-effect model was used to explore the pooled effect sizes accounted for by the intervention for developmental outcome of cognition, language, motor, and social-emotional capacities. Exploratory moderation analyses were also conducted. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials representing over 10,400 children from 12 low- and middle-income countries and regions across three continents (Africa, Latin America, and Asia) were identified. The interventions showed overall small-to-moderate effects on children's cognitive development ( = 0.44; 95% CI = [0.30, 0.57]); language development ( = 0.33; 95% CI = [0.18, 0.49]); and motor skills ( = 0.21; 95% CI = [0.10, 0.32]). The overall effect on social-emotional development was non-significant ( = 0.17; 95% CI = [-0.01, 0.34]). Effect sizes (ES) varied significantly across the studies. Parenting programs that targeted vulnerable groups, including rural communities and caregivers with lower education levels, had more significant effects on children's development. Group sessions (vs. individual visits) and high program dose (≥12 sessions) were also associated with stronger effects on child development. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of the workforce and training on programmatic outcomes. The findings indicate that parenting interventions that encourage nurturing care are effective in improving the early development of children, especially among vulnerable populations. We discuss opportunities to strengthen the implementation of research-based parenting interventions in such contexts.
超过 2.5 亿中低收入国家的儿童由于存在营养不良和学习机会不足等并发风险,其全面发展潜力面临风险。早期干预项目整合了养育关怀的各个方面,即良好的健康、充足的营养、安全保障、响应性照顾和学习机会,可能有助于缓解这些不利条件的负面影响。本元分析综述更新了包含刺激和响应性照顾成分的育儿干预措施对中低收入国家 2 岁以下儿童发展结果的证据基础。它还描述和评估了人口特征和实施特征对干预效果的调节作用。研究是根据之前的系统综述和 2020 年 12 月前在八个数据库和灰色文献中进行的最新文献检索确定的。使用随机效应模型探索干预对认知、语言、运动和社会情感能力发展的综合效果大小。还进行了探索性调节分析。确定了 21 项随机对照试验,代表来自三大洲(非洲、拉丁美洲和亚洲) 12 个中低收入国家和地区的超过 10400 名儿童。这些干预措施对儿童认知发展( = 0.44;95%置信区间 [0.30,0.57])、语言发展( = 0.33;95%置信区间 [0.18,0.49])和运动技能( = 0.21;95%置信区间 [0.10,0.32])有总体上较小到中等的影响。对社会情感发展的总体影响不显著( = 0.17;95%置信区间 [-0.01,0.34])。研究之间的效应大小差异显著。针对弱势群体的育儿方案,包括农村社区和教育程度较低的照顾者,对儿童发展的影响更为显著。小组会议(与个别访问相比)和高方案剂量(≥12 次会议)也与儿童发展的更强效果相关。需要进一步研究以确定劳动力和培训对方案结果的有效性。研究结果表明,鼓励养育关怀的育儿干预措施可有效改善儿童的早期发展,特别是在弱势群体中。我们讨论了在这种情况下加强实施基于研究的育儿干预措施的机会。