• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Parosmia 嗅觉功能障碍结局评分(DisODOR)的制定与验证。

Development and Validation of the Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (DisODOR).

机构信息

Clinical Outcomes Research Office, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;169(6):1654-1661. doi: 10.1002/ohn.477. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1002/ohn.477
PMID:37622602
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Develop and validate a quality-of-life (QoL) outcome measure for patients with dysosmia.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey study.

SETTING

Otolaryngology clinics, research registries, and Facebook support groups.

METHODS

A 59-item pilot survey with questions addressing parosmia concerns was developed using input from subjects with parosmia and clinical expertise from Otolaryngologists. After item reduction, the Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (DisODOR) was reduced to its final 29 items. DisODOR maximum score is 116 (each item score 0-4) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of dysfunction from smell distortion. DisODOR was validated using participants with parosmia persisting >3 months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (cases) and healthy controls. Reliability, face and content validity, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminative validity, sensitivity to change, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 134 cases and 20 controls completed DisODOR. The mean (SD) age was 45.9 (12.2) for cases and 29.6 (8.9) for controls. The mean score difference between cases and controls was 45.0 (95% confidence interval, 40.5-49.5) displaying good discriminative validity. DisODOR showed strong test-retest reliability (r = .942) with high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .971). DisODOR had a moderate correlation with SNOT-22 scores (r = .619) indicating good convergent validity. There is an excellent association with the global impression of severity categories (η  = 0.447). Based on the distribution method, the MCID is 15.

CONCLUSION

DisODOR is a valid, reliable QoL instrument for parosmia that can be used to measure the functional impact and QoL impairment for parosmia patients. DisODOR is sensitive to change and thus can be used in studies investigating treatments for parosmia.

摘要

目的

为嗅觉障碍患者开发和验证生活质量(QoL)结局测量工具。

研究设计

横断面调查研究。

设置

耳鼻喉科诊所、研究登记处和 Facebook 支持小组。

方法

使用嗅觉障碍患者的输入和耳鼻喉科医生的临床专业知识,开发了一个包含 59 个项目的试点调查,这些问题涉及到嗅觉障碍的担忧。经过项目缩减,嗅觉障碍嗅觉功能障碍结局评分(DisODOR)缩减为最终的 29 个项目。DisODOR 的最大得分为 116(每个项目得分为 0-4),得分越高表明嗅觉扭曲导致的功能障碍程度越高。使用 SARS-CoV-2 后持续 3 个月以上的嗅觉障碍患者(病例)和健康对照者对 DisODOR 进行验证。评估了可靠性、表面和内容有效性、内部一致性、收敛有效性、判别有效性、对变化的敏感性以及最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

结果

共有 134 例病例和 20 例对照完成了 DisODOR。病例的平均(SD)年龄为 45.9(12.2),对照组为 29.6(8.9)。病例与对照组之间的平均得分差异为 45.0(95%置信区间,40.5-49.5),显示出良好的判别有效性。DisODOR 具有良好的重测信度(r=.942)和较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=.971)。DisODOR 与 SNOT-22 评分中度相关(r=.619),表明具有良好的收敛有效性。与整体严重程度类别具有极好的相关性(η=0.447)。根据分布方法,MCID 为 15。

结论

DisODOR 是一种用于嗅觉障碍的有效、可靠的生活质量工具,可用于测量嗅觉障碍患者的功能影响和生活质量受损情况。DisODOR 对变化敏感,因此可用于研究嗅觉障碍的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Parosmia Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (DisODOR).Parosmia 嗅觉功能障碍结局评分(DisODOR)的制定与验证。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;169(6):1654-1661. doi: 10.1002/ohn.477. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
2
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating.嗅觉功能障碍结局评定量表的编制及心理计量学验证。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec 1;148(12):1132-1139. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3299.
3
Proof-of-concept: SCENTinel 1.1 rapidly discriminates COVID-19-related olfactory disorders.概念验证:SCENTinel 1.1 快速区分与 COVID-19 相关的嗅觉障碍。
Chem Senses. 2023 Jan 1;48. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjad002.
4
Validity and reliability of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders for Italian-speaking patients with olfactory dysfunction.《嗅觉障碍患者嗅觉障碍问卷(意大利语版)》的信度和效度。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Feb;44(1):42-51. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2736.
5
Prevalence and correlates of parosmia and phantosmia among smell disorders.嗅觉障碍患者中嗅觉异常和幻嗅的患病率及相关因素。
Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab046.
6
Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire.嗅觉障碍问卷法的法文版的有效性和可靠性。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;51(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2.
7
Qualitative Olfactory Dysfunction and COVID-19: An Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations for the Clinician.定性嗅觉功能障碍与 COVID-19:基于证据的综述及对临床医生的建议。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023 Jan;37(1):95-101. doi: 10.1177/19458924221120117. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
8
Assessment of postviral qualitative olfactory dysfunction using the short SSParoT in patients with and without parosmia.采用短版 SSParoT 评估病毒后嗅觉功能障碍的定性分析:伴有及不伴有幻嗅患者的研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):469-472. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders.《嗅觉障碍问卷》韩文版的信度和效度。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Dec;8(12):1481-1485. doi: 10.1002/alr.22186. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
10
Parosmia is Associated with Relevant Olfactory Recovery After Olfactory Training.幻嗅与嗅觉训练后的相关嗅觉恢复有关。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):618-623. doi: 10.1002/lary.29277. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of COVID-19-Induced Parosmia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.星状神经节阻滞治疗新冠病毒感染所致嗅觉异常:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.1304.
2
Parosmia: Pathophysiology and Management.嗅觉倒错:病理生理学与管理
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01189-z.
3
Clinical studies in COVID-related olfactory disorders: Review of an institutional experience.新型冠状病毒肺炎相关嗅觉障碍的临床研究:机构经验回顾
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Apr 19;10(2):129-136. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.176. eCollection 2024 Jun.