• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业兴趣与教学偏好:在自然 - 人文 - 社会学科中,谁更喜欢哪个教学主题?

Vocational Interests and Teaching Preferences: Who Prefers Which Teaching Topic in the Nature-Human-Society Subject?

作者信息

Pahl Angelika, Tschiesner Reinhard

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39042 Brixen, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;13(8):658. doi: 10.3390/bs13080658.

DOI:10.3390/bs13080658
PMID:37622798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10451684/
Abstract

This study focuses on the vocational interests of trainee teachers for kindergarten and primary school, investigating whether the RIASEC-interest dimensions are related to teaching preferences in the Swiss subject of Nature-Human-Society, which is characterized by its multidisciplinarity. Interests are a source of individual differences in people and important to study since they influence intrinsic motivation, and thus, behavior, effort, and occupational decisions. The results of the conducted survey, composed of the Nature-Human-Society questionnaire and the general interest structure test (AIST-R), show, in a sample of 220 participants, that trainee teachers' vocational interests were partly related to their previous experiences in the specific content domains of Nature-Human-Society and slightly differed by gender. The RIASEC interest dimensions of social, investigative, realistic, and partly artistic evidence significant correlations with preferences in the teaching topics of the Nature-Human-Society subject. It became clear that trainee teachers with high realistic and investigative interests and low social and artistic interests tended to prefer thing-related teaching topics, while pronounced social and artistic interests with low realistic and investigative interests were associated with teaching preferences for people-related topics in the subject of Nature-Human-Society. The dominant role of Prediger's people- versus thing-related interest orientation could thus also be confirmed in the choice of favorite teaching topics, signaling that teachers feel comfortable with those topics that match their interest structure.

摘要

本研究聚焦于幼儿园和小学实习教师的职业兴趣,调查在瑞士以多学科性为特征的“自然 - 人类 - 社会”学科中,RIASEC兴趣维度是否与教学偏好相关。兴趣是个体差异的一个来源,且由于它影响内在动机,进而影响行为、努力程度和职业决策,所以对其进行研究很重要。由“自然 - 人类 - 社会”问卷和一般兴趣结构测试(AIST - R)组成的调查结果显示,在220名参与者的样本中,实习教师的职业兴趣部分与他们之前在“自然 - 人类 - 社会”特定内容领域的经历相关,且在性别上略有差异。社会、研究、现实以及部分艺术方面的RIASEC兴趣维度与“自然 - 人类 - 社会”学科教学主题的偏好存在显著相关性。很明显,具有高现实和研究兴趣以及低社会和艺术兴趣的实习教师倾向于偏好与事物相关的教学主题,而具有显著社会和艺术兴趣以及低现实和研究兴趣的实习教师则与在“自然 - 人类 - 社会”学科中对与人相关主题的教学偏好相关。因此,普雷迪格的人与事物相关兴趣取向的主导作用在最喜欢的教学主题选择中也得到了证实,这表明教师对与他们兴趣结构相匹配的主题感到自在。

相似文献

1
Vocational Interests and Teaching Preferences: Who Prefers Which Teaching Topic in the Nature-Human-Society Subject?职业兴趣与教学偏好:在自然 - 人文 - 社会学科中,谁更喜欢哪个教学主题?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;13(8):658. doi: 10.3390/bs13080658.
2
Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension.与性别相关的个体差异和职业兴趣结构:人与事物维度的重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;74(4):996-1009. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.996.
3
General or Vocational Education? The Role of Vocational Interests in Educational Decisions at the End of Compulsory School in Switzerland.普通教育还是职业教育?职业兴趣在瑞士义务教育结束时教育决策中的作用。
Vocat Learn. 2021;14(1):115-145. doi: 10.1007/s12186-020-09256-y. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
Holland in Iceland revisited: an emic approach to evaluating U.S. vocational interest models.再探冰岛的荷兰人:一种评估美国职业兴趣模型的本土化方法。
J Couns Psychol. 2010 Jul;57(3):361-7. doi: 10.1037/a0019685.
5
Vocational interests of intellectually gifted and highly achieving young adults.高智商和高成就的年轻成年人的职业兴趣。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Jun;83(Pt 2):305-28. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02063.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.男性与物,女性与人:兴趣的性别差异元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):859-884. doi: 10.1037/a0017364.
7
Mapping medical careers: questionnaire assessment of career preferences in medical school applicants and final-year students.医学职业规划:对医学院申请者和即将毕业的学生职业偏好的问卷调查评估
BMC Med Educ. 2004 Oct 1;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-18.
8
Vocational interests in the United States: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects.美国的职业兴趣:性别、年龄、种族和年份效应。
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Oct;63(5):604-615. doi: 10.1037/cou0000164. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
Normative changes in interests from adolescence to adulthood: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.从青春期到成年期兴趣的规范变化:纵向研究的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;144(4):426-451. doi: 10.1037/bul0000140. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
What makes a physical education teacher? Personal characteristics for physical education development.什么造就了一名体育教师?体育发展的个人特征。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Dec;91(4):1249-1274. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12415. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
General or Vocational Education? The Role of Vocational Interests in Educational Decisions at the End of Compulsory School in Switzerland.普通教育还是职业教育?职业兴趣在瑞士义务教育结束时教育决策中的作用。
Vocat Learn. 2021;14(1):115-145. doi: 10.1007/s12186-020-09256-y. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
2
All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields.所有 STEM 领域并非生来平等:人和事物兴趣解释了 STEM 领域的性别差距。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 25;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00189. eCollection 2015.
3
Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
你有兴趣吗?职业兴趣与员工绩效和离职关系的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Nov;96(6):1167-94. doi: 10.1037/a0024343. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
4
People--things and data--ideas: bipolar dimensions?人——物与数据——观念:两极维度?
J Couns Psychol. 2011 Jul;58(3):424-40. doi: 10.1037/a0023488.
5
Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.男性与物,女性与人:兴趣的性别差异元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):859-884. doi: 10.1037/a0017364.
6
Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: "sinking shafts at a few critical points".评估个体差异的科学与社会意义:“在几个关键点上挖掘竖井”
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:405-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.405.