Lecointre Guillaume, Aish Annabelle, Améziane Nadia, Chekchak Tarik, Goupil Christophe, Grandcolas Philippe, Vincent Julian F V, Sun Jian-Sheng
Institut de Systématique, Évolution et Biodiversité, UMR ISYEB 7205 CNRS MNHN SU EPHE UA, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP 50, 45 Rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France.
Bioinspire-Museum, Direction Générale Déléguée à la Recherche, l'Expertise, la Valorisation et l'Enseignement (DGD REVE), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 57 Rue Cuvier, CP 17, 75005 Paris, France.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Aug 13;8(4):362. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040362.
Effective bioinspiration requires dialogue between designers and biologists, and this dialogue must be rooted in a shared scientific understanding of living systems. To support learning from "nature's overarching design lessons" the Biomimicry Institute has produced ten "Unifying Patterns of Nature". These patterns have been developed to engage with those interested in finding biologically inspired solutions to human challenges. Yet, although well-intentioned and appealing, they are likely to dishearten biologists. The aim of this paper is to identify why and propose alternative principles based on evolutionary theory.
有效的生物启发需要设计师和生物学家之间的对话,而这种对话必须建立在对生命系统的共同科学理解之上。为了支持从“大自然的总体设计经验”中学习,仿生学研究所提出了十条“自然统一模式”。这些模式的制定是为了吸引那些有兴趣寻找受生物启发解决人类挑战方案的人。然而,尽管这些模式初衷良好且颇具吸引力,但它们可能会让生物学家感到沮丧。本文旨在找出原因,并基于进化理论提出替代原则。