Sebastian Sonia, Hoffmann Manuela Klingler, Howard Douglas, Young Clifford, Washington Jenni, Unterweger Harald, Alexiou Christoph, Turnbull Tyron, D'Andrea Richard, Hoffmann Peter, Kempson Ivan
Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia.
Clinical Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;12(8):1617. doi: 10.3390/antiox12081617.
Nanoparticle-based therapeutics are being clinically translated for treating cancer. Even when thought to be biocompatible, nanoparticles are being increasingly identified as altering cell regulation and homeostasis. Antioxidant pathways are important for maintaining cell redox homeostasis and play important roles by maintaining ROS levels within tolerable ranges. Here, we sought to understand how a model of a relatively inert nanoparticle without any therapeutic agent itself could antagonize a cancer cell lines' antioxidant mechanism. A label-free protein expression approach was used to assess the glutathione-thioredoxin antioxidative pathway in a prostate cancer cell line (PC-3) after exposure to gold nanoparticles conjugated with a targeting moiety (transferrin). The impact of the nanoparticles was also corroborated through morphological analysis with TEM and classification of pro-apoptotic cells by way of the sub-G0/G1 population via the cell cycle and annexin V apoptosis assay. After a two-hour exposure to nanoparticles, major proteins associated with the glutathione-thioredoxin antioxidant pathway were downregulated. However, this response was acute, and in terms of protein expression, cells quickly recovered within 24 h once nanoparticle exposure ceased. The impact on PRDX-family proteins appears as the most influential factor in how these nanoparticles induced an oxidative stress response in the PC-3 cells. An apparent adaptive response was observed if exposure to nanoparticles continued. Acute exposure was observed to have a detrimental effect on cell viability compared to continuously exposed cells. Nanoparticle effects on cell regulation likely provide a compounding therapeutic advantage under some circumstances, in addition to the action of any cytotoxic agents; however, any therapeutic advantage offered by nanoparticles themselves with regard to vulnerabilities specific to the glutathione-thioredoxin antioxidative pathway is highly temporal.
基于纳米颗粒的疗法正在进行癌症治疗的临床转化。即使被认为具有生物相容性,纳米颗粒也越来越多地被发现会改变细胞调节和体内平衡。抗氧化途径对于维持细胞氧化还原稳态很重要,并且通过将活性氧水平维持在可耐受范围内发挥重要作用。在这里,我们试图了解一种本身没有任何治疗剂的相对惰性的纳米颗粒模型如何拮抗癌细胞系的抗氧化机制。在暴露于与靶向部分(转铁蛋白)偶联的金纳米颗粒后,使用无标记蛋白质表达方法评估前列腺癌细胞系(PC-3)中的谷胱甘肽-硫氧还蛋白抗氧化途径。纳米颗粒的影响也通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)的形态分析以及通过细胞周期和膜联蛋白V凋亡测定法对亚G0/G1期细胞群进行促凋亡细胞分类得到证实。在暴露于纳米颗粒两小时后,与谷胱甘肽-硫氧还蛋白抗氧化途径相关的主要蛋白质被下调。然而,这种反应是急性的,就蛋白质表达而言,一旦纳米颗粒暴露停止,细胞在24小时内迅速恢复。对PRDX家族蛋白的影响似乎是这些纳米颗粒如何在PC-3细胞中诱导氧化应激反应的最有影响的因素。如果继续暴露于纳米颗粒,则观察到明显的适应性反应。与持续暴露的细胞相比,急性暴露对细胞活力有不利影响。纳米颗粒对细胞调节的影响可能在某些情况下除了任何细胞毒性剂的作用之外还提供了复合治疗优势;然而,纳米颗粒本身在谷胱甘肽-硫氧还蛋白抗氧化途径特有的脆弱性方面提供的任何治疗优势都是高度暂时的。