• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用深度学习检测表皮贴片试验中的皮肤反应:预处理和模态性能评估

Detecting Skin Reactions in Epicutaneous Patch Testing with Deep Learning: An Evaluation of Pre-Processing and Modality Performance.

作者信息

Vezakis Ioannis A, Lambrou George I, Kyritsi Aikaterini, Tagka Anna, Chatziioannou Argyro, Matsopoulos George K

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., 15780 Athens, Greece.

Choremeio Research Laboratory, First Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 8 Thivon & Levadeias St., 11527 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 3;10(8):924. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080924.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering10080924
PMID:37627809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10451716/
Abstract

Epicutaneous patch testing is a well-established diagnostic method for identifying substances that may cause Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD), a common skin condition caused by exposure to environmental allergens. While the patch test remains the gold standard for identifying allergens, it is prone to observer bias and consumes valuable human resources. Deep learning models can be employed to address this challenge. In this study, we collected a dataset of 1579 multi-modal skin images from 200 patients using the Antera 3D camera. We then investigated the feasibility of using a deep learning classifier for automating the identification of the allergens causing ACD. We propose a deep learning approach that utilizes a context-retaining pre-processing technique to improve the accuracy of the classifier. In addition, we find promise in the combination of the color image and false-color map of hemoglobin concentration to improve diagnostic accuracy. Our results showed that this approach can potentially achieve more than 86% recall and 94% specificity in identifying skin reactions, and contribute to faster and more accurate diagnosis while reducing clinician workload.

摘要

表皮贴片试验是一种成熟的诊断方法,用于识别可能导致过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的物质,这是一种因接触环境过敏原而引起的常见皮肤病。虽然贴片试验仍然是识别过敏原的金标准,但它容易受到观察者偏差的影响,并且消耗宝贵的人力资源。深度学习模型可用于应对这一挑战。在本研究中,我们使用Antera 3D相机从200名患者那里收集了一个包含1579张多模态皮肤图像的数据集。然后,我们研究了使用深度学习分类器自动识别导致ACD的过敏原的可行性。我们提出了一种深度学习方法,该方法利用一种保留上下文的预处理技术来提高分类器的准确性。此外,我们发现将彩色图像和血红蛋白浓度的伪彩色图相结合有望提高诊断准确性。我们的结果表明,这种方法在识别皮肤反应方面可能实现超过86%的召回率和94%的特异性,并有助于更快、更准确地诊断,同时减轻临床医生的工作量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/0285bfbac70b/bioengineering-10-00924-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/37fadae4f206/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/435188960be2/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/ae1d33694542/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/d8da43cfb8d3/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/5b0219dc412b/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/e1fcb901572d/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/6a17649cc8a1/bioengineering-10-00924-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/33f211cc4644/bioengineering-10-00924-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/8eb7c7b9ab42/bioengineering-10-00924-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/0e8b0fca8abf/bioengineering-10-00924-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/4ac43526095a/bioengineering-10-00924-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/0285bfbac70b/bioengineering-10-00924-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/37fadae4f206/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/435188960be2/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/ae1d33694542/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/d8da43cfb8d3/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/5b0219dc412b/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/e1fcb901572d/bioengineering-10-00924-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/6a17649cc8a1/bioengineering-10-00924-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/33f211cc4644/bioengineering-10-00924-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/8eb7c7b9ab42/bioengineering-10-00924-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/0e8b0fca8abf/bioengineering-10-00924-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/4ac43526095a/bioengineering-10-00924-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ca/10451716/0285bfbac70b/bioengineering-10-00924-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Detecting Skin Reactions in Epicutaneous Patch Testing with Deep Learning: An Evaluation of Pre-Processing and Modality Performance.利用深度学习检测表皮贴片试验中的皮肤反应:预处理和模态性能评估
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 3;10(8):924. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080924.
2
Analysis of Epicutaneous Patch Test Results in Patients with Contact Dermatitis.接触性皮炎患者表皮贴斑试验结果分析
Med Arch. 2018 Oct;72(4):276-279. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.276-279.
3
Comparison between patch test results of natural dyes and standard allergens in batik workers with occupational contact dermatitis.职业性接触性皮炎患者中天然染料斑贴试验与标准变应原的比较。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2022 Sep;41(3):215-220. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2022.2077751. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
The Unique Molecular Signatures of Contact Dermatitis and Implications for Treatment.接触性皮炎的独特分子特征及其治疗意义。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Feb;56(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8685-0.
5
Allergic Contact Dermatitis Secondary to Moisturizers.接触性过敏性皮炎继发于保湿剂。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2020 Jul/Aug;24(4):350-359. doi: 10.1177/1203475420919396. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
6
A deep learning approach to direct immunofluorescence pattern recognition in autoimmune bullous diseases.深度学习方法在自身免疫性大疱性疾病中的直接免疫荧光模式识别。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):261-266. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae142.
7
A Hands-on Approach to Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing.接触性皮炎与斑贴试验的实践方法
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):1883-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Environmental contact factors in eczema and the results of patch testing Chinese patients with a modified European standard series of allergens.湿疹中的环境接触因素以及对中国患者使用改良欧洲标准变应原系列进行斑贴试验的结果
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Jul;51(1):22-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00369.x.
9
Experience in patch testing: A 6-year retrospective review from a single academic allergy practice.斑贴试验经验:来自单一学术过敏实践的 6 年回顾性研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 May;122(5):502-507. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Patch Testing Beyond the TRUE Test.过敏性接触性皮炎:超越TRUE试验的斑贴试验
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 Oct;3(10):36-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Patch Testing: Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Future Prospects in Dermatology.斑贴试验中的人工智能:皮肤病学当前应用及未来前景的全面综述
JMIR Dermatol. 2025 Jun 2;8:e67154. doi: 10.2196/67154.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promises.医学成像中的深度学习综述:成像特征、技术趋势、具有进展亮点的案例研究及未来展望。
Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2021 May;109(5):820-838. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2021.3054390. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Deep Learning Approaches to Osteosarcoma Diagnosis and Classification: A Comparative Methodological Approach.骨肉瘤诊断与分类的深度学习方法:一种比较性的方法学途径
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 13;15(8):2290. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082290.
3
DermoCC-GAN: A new approach for standardizing dermatological images using generative adversarial networks.
DermoCC-GAN:一种使用生成对抗网络标准化皮肤科图像的新方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107040. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107040. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
A review on deep learning in medical image analysis.医学图像分析中的深度学习综述。
Int J Multimed Inf Retr. 2022;11(1):19-38. doi: 10.1007/s13735-021-00218-1. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Artificial intelligence in small intestinal diseases: Application and prospects.人工智能在小肠疾病中的应用及前景
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 7;27(25):3734-3747. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3734.
6
Management of Acute Radiodermatitis in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Patients Using Electrospun Nanofibrous Patches Loaded with Bark Extract.使用负载树皮提取物的电纺纳米纤维贴片治疗非黑色素瘤皮肤癌患者的急性放射性皮炎
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 26;13(11):2596. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112596.
7
Automated detection of skin reactions in epicutaneous patch testing using machine learning.使用机器学习自动检测皮肤斑贴试验中的皮肤反应。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;185(2):456-458. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20141. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2019.2019年欧洲基线系列及推荐新增内容。
Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Jan;80(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/cod.13155. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Comparison of two skin imaging analysis instruments: The VISIA from Canfield vs the ANTERA 3D CS from Miravex.两种皮肤成像分析仪器的比较:康菲尔德公司的VISIA与米瑞维克公司的ANTERA 3D CS。
Skin Res Technol. 2018 Feb;24(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12381. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Patch Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hand Eczema.斑贴试验作为手部湿疹的诊断工具
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):WC04-WC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23994.8884. Epub 2016 Nov 1.