• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于贝尔态的多方量子私密比较

Multi-Party Quantum Private Comparison Based on Bell States.

作者信息

Wu Wanqing, Wu Jiahui, Guo Lingna

机构信息

School of Cyber Security and Computer, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China.

Key Laboratory on High Trusted Information System in Hebei Province, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;25(8):1156. doi: 10.3390/e25081156.

DOI:10.3390/e25081156
PMID:37628186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10453112/
Abstract

Multi-party quantum private comparison (MQPC) assumes responsibility for overseeing the flow of data and communication among diverse entities, wherein it boasts powerful security capabilities that have garnered substantial attention. Most current MQPC protocols rely on difficult-to-prepare quantum states and are inefficient in their use of resources. In this paper, we propose a novel MQPC protocol without entanglement swapping, thereby building upon the assumption of an ideal channel. This protocol is based on Bell states, which simplifies implementation and addresses the challenges associated with using complex quantum states; it also enables the comparison of secret information by having a trusted party prepare and transmit encoded quantum sequences to participants, thereby facilitating efficient equality comparison among all parties. Our MQPC protocol showcased remarkable efficiency in comparison to existing protocols for quantum private comparison. Furthermore, the incorporation of decoy photon and shared key technologies made external and internal attacks ineffective, thereby ensuring the utmost security and integrity of the protocol.

摘要

多方量子私密比较(MQPC)负责监督不同实体之间的数据和通信流,它具有强大的安全能力,因而备受关注。当前大多数MQPC协议依赖于难以制备的量子态,且资源利用效率低下。在本文中,我们提出了一种无需纠缠交换的新型MQPC协议,该协议基于理想信道的假设。此协议基于贝尔态,简化了实现过程,并解决了使用复杂量子态所带来的挑战;它还通过让可信方制备并向参与者传输编码量子序列,实现了秘密信息的比较,从而便于各方之间进行高效的相等性比较。与现有的量子私密比较协议相比,我们的MQPC协议展现出了显著的效率。此外,诱饵光子和共享密钥技术的引入使得外部和内部攻击均无效,从而确保了协议的最高安全性和完整性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f233/10453112/40e4238c60b1/entropy-25-01156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f233/10453112/40e4238c60b1/entropy-25-01156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f233/10453112/40e4238c60b1/entropy-25-01156-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-Party Quantum Private Comparison Based on Bell States.基于贝尔态的多方量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;25(8):1156. doi: 10.3390/e25081156.
2
New Quantum Private Comparison Using Bell States.基于贝尔态的新型量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;26(8):682. doi: 10.3390/e26080682.
3
Efficient Quantum Private Comparison without Sharing a Key.无需共享密钥的高效量子私密比较。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;25(11):1552. doi: 10.3390/e25111552.
4
Efficient Quantum Private Comparison Based on GHZ States.基于GHZ态的高效量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2024 May 10;26(5):413. doi: 10.3390/e26050413.
5
Multi-Party Quantum Summation Based on Quantum Teleportation.基于量子隐形传态的多方量子求和
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Jul 23;21(7):719. doi: 10.3390/e21070719.
6
New Quantum Private Comparison Using Four-Particle Cluster State.基于四粒子簇态的新型量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;26(6):512. doi: 10.3390/e26060512.
7
Multi-Party Quantum Secret Sharing Based on GHZ State.基于GHZ态的多方量子秘密共享
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Oct 8;24(10):1433. doi: 10.3390/e24101433.
8
Splitting an Arbitrary Three-Qubit State via a Five-Qubit Cluster State and a Bell State.通过一个五量子比特簇态和一个贝尔态分解任意三量子比特态。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;24(3):381. doi: 10.3390/e24030381.
9
A Semi-Quantum Private Comparison Base on W-States.一种基于W态的半量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;25(9):1269. doi: 10.3390/e25091269.
10
Lightweight mediated semi-quantum key distribution protocol with a dishonest third party based on Bell states.基于贝尔态的轻量级有第三方不诚实的半量子密钥分发协议。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 1;11(1):23222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02614-3.

引用本文的文献

1
New Quantum Private Comparison Using Four-Particle Cluster State.基于四粒子簇态的新型量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;26(6):512. doi: 10.3390/e26060512.
2
Efficient Quantum Private Comparison Based on GHZ States.基于GHZ态的高效量子私密比较
Entropy (Basel). 2024 May 10;26(5):413. doi: 10.3390/e26050413.

本文引用的文献

1
Robust twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending.通过发送或不发送实现的稳健双场量子密钥分发。
Natl Sci Rev. 2022 Sep 19;10(4):nwac186. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac186. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Sending or Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Flawed and Leaky Sources.具有有缺陷和泄漏源的发送或不发送双场量子密钥分发
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;23(9):1103. doi: 10.3390/e23091103.
3
Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km.独立激光器的发送或不发送:在 509km 上实现安全的双场量子密钥分发。
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Feb 21;124(7):070501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.070501.
4
Implementation and security analysis of practical quantum secure direct communication.实用量子安全直接通信的实现与安全性分析
Light Sci Appl. 2019 Feb 6;8:22. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0132-3. eCollection 2019.
5
Quantum Secret Sharing Among Four Players Using Multipartite Bound Entanglement of an Optical Field.四玩家使用光场的多部分束缚纠缠实现量子秘密共享。
Phys Rev Lett. 2018 Oct 12;121(15):150502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.150502.
6
Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters.在不使用量子中继器的情况下突破量子密钥分发的速率-距离限制。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):400-403. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
Decoy state quantum key distribution.诱骗态量子密钥分发
Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Jun 17;94(23):230504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504. Epub 2005 Jun 16.
8
Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol.BB84量子密钥分发协议安全性的简单证明。
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 10;85(2):441-4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441.
9
New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs.新型高强度偏振纠缠光子对源。
Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Dec 11;75(24):4337-4341. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337.