• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨基葡萄糖治疗骨关节炎的成本效益:一项系统评价

Cost-Effectiveness of Glucosamine in Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Vo Nam Xuan, Le Ngan Nguyen Hoang, Chu Trinh Dang Phuong, Pham Huong Lai, Dinh Khang Xuan An, Che Uyen Thi Thuc, Ngo Thanh Thi Thanh, Bui Tien Thuy

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.

Faculty of Pharmacy, Le Van Thinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;11(16):2340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162340.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11162340
PMID:37628537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10454215/
Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition that most frequently affects older adults. It is currently the most common disability. The cost of treating an aging population places pressure on the healthcare budget. As a result, it is imperative to evaluate medicines' cost-effectiveness and, accordingly, their influence on health resource allocation. Our study aims to summarize the cost and outcome of utilizing glucosamine in OA treatment. Databases like Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched as part of the identification process up until April 2023. Our primary inclusion criteria centered on the economic evaluation of glucosamine in OA treatments, providing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument was applied to grade the quality of the studies. Seven qualified studies that discussed the cost-effectiveness of glucosamine with or without other formulations were selected. All of them demonstrated that glucosamine was cost-effective. There was an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) when incorporating glucosamine in conventional care. Moreover, patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate (pCGS) was more cost-effective than the other formulations of glucosamine (OFG). Overall, utilizing pCGS was more beneficial than using OFG in terms both of cost and quality of life.

摘要

骨关节炎(OA)是一种最常影响老年人的慢性疾病。它是目前最常见的致残原因。治疗老龄化人口的成本给医疗保健预算带来了压力。因此,评估药物的成本效益以及它们对卫生资源分配的影响势在必行。我们的研究旨在总结使用氨基葡萄糖治疗骨关节炎的成本和结果。作为识别过程的一部分,检索了Medline、Cochrane和Scopus等数据库,直至2023年4月。我们的主要纳入标准集中在氨基葡萄糖治疗骨关节炎的经济评估上,提供增量成本效益比(ICER)。应用健康经济研究质量(QHES)工具对研究质量进行分级。选择了七项讨论了氨基葡萄糖与其他制剂联合或不联合使用的成本效益的合格研究。所有研究都表明氨基葡萄糖具有成本效益。在传统治疗中加入氨基葡萄糖后,质量调整生命年(QALY)有所增加。此外,专利结晶硫酸氨基葡萄糖(pCGS)比其他氨基葡萄糖制剂(OFG)更具成本效益。总体而言,在成本和生活质量方面,使用pCGS比使用OFG更有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/263c/10454215/f8253e5ed390/healthcare-11-02340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/263c/10454215/f8253e5ed390/healthcare-11-02340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/263c/10454215/f8253e5ed390/healthcare-11-02340-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Glucosamine in Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Systematic Review.氨基葡萄糖治疗骨关节炎的成本效益:一项系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;11(16):2340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162340.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Assessment of Different Glucosamines in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Simulation Model Adapted to Germany.膝关节骨关节炎患者中不同氨基葡萄糖的成本效益评估:一种适用于德国的模拟模型
Curr Aging Sci. 2021;14(3):242-248. doi: 10.2174/1874609814666210415092845.
3
Economic Evaluation of Glucosamine in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatments in Vietnam.越南膝关节骨关节炎治疗中氨基葡萄糖的经济学评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;11(18):2502. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182502.
4
An economic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis treatments in Thailand.泰国膝关节骨关节炎治疗的经济学评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 26;13:926431. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.926431. eCollection 2022.
5
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of glucosamine for osteoarthritis based on simulation of individual patient data obtained from aggregated data in published studies.基于对已发表研究中汇总数据中个体患者数据的模拟,对氨基葡萄糖治疗骨关节炎的成本效益评估。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jun;31(6):881-887. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01138-1. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
The clinical effectiveness of glucosamine and chondroitin supplements in slowing or arresting progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and economic evaluation.氨基葡萄糖和软骨素补充剂在减缓或阻止膝关节骨关节炎进展方面的临床效果:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Nov;13(52):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta13520.
7
Health Technology Assessment of Different Glucosamine Formulations and Preparations Currently Marketed in Thailand.泰国目前市场上不同氨基葡萄糖制剂和产品的卫生技术评估。
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;10(3):23. doi: 10.3390/medicines10030023.
8
Differentiation of patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate from other glucosamine preparations will optimize osteoarthritis treatment.将专利结晶硫酸葡萄糖胺与其他葡萄糖胺制剂区分开来,将优化骨关节炎的治疗。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;22(3):376-385. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13068. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
A review of glucosamine for knee osteoarthritis: why patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate should be differentiated from other glucosamines to maximize clinical outcomes.氨基葡萄糖治疗膝骨关节炎的综述:为何专利结晶硫酸氨基葡萄糖应与其他氨基葡萄糖区分开来以实现最佳临床效果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Jun;32(6):997-1004. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1154521. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in the Oldest Old.高龄老人骨质疏松症和骨关节炎的治疗
Drugs. 2025 Mar;85(3):343-360. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02138-w. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Technology Assessment of Different Glucosamine Formulations and Preparations Currently Marketed in Thailand.泰国目前市场上不同氨基葡萄糖制剂和产品的卫生技术评估。
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;10(3):23. doi: 10.3390/medicines10030023.
2
An economic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis treatments in Thailand.泰国膝关节骨关节炎治疗的经济学评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 26;13:926431. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.926431. eCollection 2022.
3
Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: A systematic review.
基于支付意愿和人均 GDP 估算医疗保健增量成本效益阈值范围:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266934. eCollection 2022.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Management for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.药物治疗骨关节炎的成本效益:系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 May;20(3):351-370. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00717-0. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
5
Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies.基于人群研究的全球、地区膝关节骨关节炎的患病率、发病率及危险因素
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 26;29-30:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
The burden of OA-health services and economics.骨关节炎的卫生服务和经济学负担。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Jan;30(1):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Assessment of Different Glucosamines in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Simulation Model Adapted to Germany.膝关节骨关节炎患者中不同氨基葡萄糖的成本效益评估:一种适用于德国的模拟模型
Curr Aging Sci. 2021;14(3):242-248. doi: 10.2174/1874609814666210415092845.
8
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
9
Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家骨关节炎负担 1990-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):819-828. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216515. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee.2019 年美国风湿病学会/关节炎基金会手部、髋部和膝关节骨关节炎管理指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):220-233. doi: 10.1002/art.41142. Epub 2020 Jan 6.