Suppr超能文献

泰国目前市场上不同氨基葡萄糖制剂和产品的卫生技术评估。

Health Technology Assessment of Different Glucosamine Formulations and Preparations Currently Marketed in Thailand.

作者信息

Bruyère Olivier, Detilleux Johann, Reginster Jean-Yves

机构信息

Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, WHO Collaborating Centre for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, CHU Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Medicines (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;10(3):23. doi: 10.3390/medicines10030023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different glucosamine formulations and preparations used for the management of osteoarthritis in Thailand compared with placebo.

METHODS

We used a validated model to simulate the individual patient Utility score from aggregated data available from 10 different clinical trials. We then used the Utility score to calculate the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over 3 and 6 months treatment period. We used the public costs of glucosamine products available in Thailand in 2019 to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We separated the analyses for prescription-grade crystalline glucosamine sulfate (pCGS) and other formulations of glucosamine. A cost-effectiveness cut-off of 3.260 USD/QALY was considered.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the glucosamine preparation (tablet or powder/capsule), the data show that pCGS is cost-effective compared with placebo over a 3 and 6 months. However, the other glucosamine formulations (e.g., glucosamine hydrochloride) never reached the breakeven point at any time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that pCGS is cost-effective for the management of osteoarthritis in the Thai context while other glucosamine formulations are not.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在泰国用于治疗骨关节炎的不同氨基葡萄糖制剂和剂型与安慰剂相比的成本效益。

方法

我们使用一个经过验证的模型,根据来自10项不同临床试验的汇总数据模拟个体患者效用评分。然后,我们使用该效用评分计算3个月和6个月治疗期内的质量调整生命年(QALY)。我们利用2019年泰国氨基葡萄糖产品的公共成本来计算增量成本效益比。我们分别对处方级结晶硫酸氨基葡萄糖(pCGS)和其他氨基葡萄糖剂型进行了分析。成本效益临界值设定为3260美元/QALY。

结果

无论氨基葡萄糖制剂是片剂还是粉剂/胶囊剂,数据表明,在3个月和6个月的治疗期内,与安慰剂相比,pCGS具有成本效益。然而,其他氨基葡萄糖剂型(如盐酸氨基葡萄糖)在任何时候都未达到盈亏平衡点。

结论

我们的数据表明,在泰国背景下,pCGS对骨关节炎的治疗具有成本效益,而其他氨基葡萄糖剂型则不然。

相似文献

4
An economic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis treatments in Thailand.泰国膝关节骨关节炎治疗的经济学评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 26;13:926431. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.926431. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

10
Cost-effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons.成本效益阈值:利弊
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):925-930. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.164418. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验