Suppr超能文献

在数字显示使用过程中的眨眼运动学特征描述。

Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use.

机构信息

Department of Optics & Optometry & Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr;260(4):1183-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05490-9. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the differences in blinking kinematics while reading on different digital displays and a control condition.

METHODS

Thirty-two young healthy individuals were included in this prospective clinical study. The blinks of subjects were recorded for 150 s while reading on a laptop computer, tablet, e-reader, and smartphone and a control condition. Blinks were recorded using an eye-tracking device and were analyzed by means of image analysis to obtain a non-invasive detailed description of the blink movement.

RESULTS

Blink rate decreased when reading on all displays compared to the control (p < 0.0005), although no differences were obtained amongst displays (p > 0.05). The percentage of incomplete blinks was higher with the computer compared to the control (p = 0.043), and lower with the smartphone compared to the rest of the conditions (p ≤ 0.015). Blink amplitude was smaller when reading from handheld devices compared to the control (p < 0.0005) and the computer (p ≤ 0.048). Closing and opening blink durations remained unvaried amongst conditions (p > 0.05), while opening and closing speeds were greater for the control and the computer compared to the handheld displays (p < 0.0005). Finally, contact and total blink durations were shorter during computer reading compared to the control (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Blinking kinematics vary considerably amongst displays and with respect to baseline, with these differences being probably attributed to differences in the way the displays are set up and the cognitive demand of the task.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在阅读不同数字显示屏和对照条件下眨眼运动学的差异。

方法

本前瞻性临床研究纳入了 32 名年轻健康个体。使用眼动追踪设备记录受试者在笔记本电脑、平板电脑、电子阅读器和智能手机以及对照条件下阅读 150 秒时的眨眼情况。通过图像分析对眨眼情况进行分析,以获得对眨眼运动的非侵入性详细描述。

结果

与对照相比,所有显示条件下的眨眼频率均降低(p < 0.0005),但显示条件之间无差异(p > 0.05)。与对照相比,在计算机上阅读时不完全眨眼的比例更高(p = 0.043),而在智能手机上阅读时则更低(p ≤ 0.015)。与对照相比,手持设备阅读时眨眼幅度较小(p < 0.0005),与计算机相比也较小(p ≤ 0.048)。眨眼的闭合和开启持续时间在不同条件之间保持不变(p > 0.05),而在对照和计算机上的开启和闭合速度比手持显示设备更快(p < 0.0005)。最后,与对照相比,在计算机阅读期间接触和总眨眼持续时间较短(p = 0.004 和 p = 0.017)。

结论

眨眼运动学在不同的显示设备之间以及与基线相比存在显著差异,这些差异可能归因于显示设备的设置方式和任务的认知需求不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95fc/8913463/0c49b8c1c6c8/417_2021_5490_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验