• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻创伤患者后路骨盆环损伤 S1-S2 髂骨螺钉固定时,螺塞是否为强制性部件?一项生物力学研究。

Is a Washer a Mandatory Component in Young Trauma Patients with S1-S2 Iliosacral Screw Fixation of Posterior Pelvis Ring Injuries? A Biomechanical Study.

机构信息

AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.

Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 28;59(8):1379. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081379.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59081379
PMID:37629669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10456504/
Abstract

: Cannulated screws are standard implants for percutaneous fixa-tion of posterior pelvis ring injuries. The choice of whether to use these screws in combination with a washer is still undecided. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical competence of S1-S2 sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation with and without using a washer across three different screw designs. : Twenty-four composite pelvises were used and an SI joint injury type APC III according to the Young and Burgess classification was simulated. Fixation of the posterior pelvis ring was performed using either partially threaded short screws, fully threaded short screws, or fully threaded long transsacral screws. Biomechanical testing was performed under progressively increasing cyclic loading until failure, with monitoring of the intersegmental and bone-implant movements via motion tracking. : The number of cycles to failure and the corresponding load at failure (N) were significantly higher for the fully threaded short screws with a washer (3972 ± 600/398.6 ± 30.0) versus its counterpart without a washer (2993 ± 527/349.7 ± 26.4), = 0.026. In contrast, these two parameters did not reveal any significant differences when comparing fixations with and without a washer using either partially threaded short of fully threaded long transsacral screws, ≥ 0.359. : From a biomechanical perspective, a washer could be optional when using partially threaded short or fully threaded long transsacral S1-S2 screws for treatment of posterior pelvis ring injuries in young trauma patients. Yet, the omission of the washer in fully threaded short screws could lead to a significant diminished biomechanical stability.

摘要

: 带螺纹的空心螺钉是经皮固定骨盆后环损伤的标准植入物。是否联合垫圈使用这些螺钉仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估三种不同螺钉设计在 S1-S2 骶髂(SI)螺钉固定时联合和不联合垫圈的生物力学性能。 : 我们使用 24 个复合材料骨盆,并根据 Young 和 Burgess 分类模拟了一种类型 APC III 的 SI 关节损伤。采用部分螺纹短螺钉、全螺纹短螺钉或全螺纹长经骶螺钉固定骨盆后环。在逐渐增加的循环载荷下进行生物力学测试,直至失效,并通过运动跟踪监测节段间和骨-植入物运动。 : 带垫圈的全螺纹短螺钉的失效循环数和相应的失效载荷(N)(3972 ± 600/398.6 ± 30.0)明显高于无垫圈的全螺纹短螺钉(2993 ± 527/349.7 ± 26.4), = 0.026。相比之下,当使用部分螺纹短螺钉或全螺纹长经骶螺钉固定时,带或不带垫圈的这两个参数之间没有显著差异, ≥ 0.359。 : 从生物力学角度来看,对于年轻创伤患者的骨盆后环损伤,在使用部分螺纹短螺钉或全螺纹长经骶螺钉治疗时,垫圈可以是可选的。然而,在全螺纹短螺钉中省略垫圈可能会导致生物力学稳定性显著降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/e2cc2d4baf1e/medicina-59-01379-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/a96922b641e3/medicina-59-01379-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/cd70ca5bb343/medicina-59-01379-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/e2cc2d4baf1e/medicina-59-01379-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/a96922b641e3/medicina-59-01379-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/cd70ca5bb343/medicina-59-01379-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b23e/10456504/e2cc2d4baf1e/medicina-59-01379-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Is a Washer a Mandatory Component in Young Trauma Patients with S1-S2 Iliosacral Screw Fixation of Posterior Pelvis Ring Injuries? A Biomechanical Study.年轻创伤患者后路骨盆环损伤 S1-S2 髂骨螺钉固定时,螺塞是否为强制性部件?一项生物力学研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 28;59(8):1379. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081379.
2
Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study.空心加压无头螺钉(CCHS)作为一种替代植入物与标准 S1-S2 骶髂螺钉固定后骨盆环的比较:一项生物力学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06312-1.
3
Cerclage augmentation of S1-S2 transsacral screw fixation in osteoporotic posterior pelvis ring injuries: A biomechanical feasibility study.经骶 S1-S2 跨关节螺钉固定增强治疗骨质疏松性骨盆后环损伤:一项生物力学可行性研究。
J Orthop Res. 2023 Dec;41(12):2740-2748. doi: 10.1002/jor.25634. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
4
Do Transsacral-transiliac Screws Across Uninjured Sacroiliac Joints Affect Pain and Functional Outcomes in Trauma Patients?经骶骨-髂骨螺钉穿过未受伤的骶髂关节对创伤患者的疼痛和功能结局有影响吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1417-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4596-z.
5
Supplemental S1 fixation for type C pelvic ring injuries: biomechanical study of a long iliosacral versus a transsacral screw.C型骨盆环损伤的补充S1固定:长髂骶螺钉与经骶骨螺钉的生物力学研究
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Dec;16(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0357-8. Epub 2015 May 31.
6
Do Fully Threaded Transiliac-Transsacral Screws Improve Mechanical Stability of Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures? A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.全螺纹经髂-经骶螺钉能否提高垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折的力学稳定性?一项尸体生物力学分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):e18-e24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001857.
7
Finite Element Analysis and Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring with Sacrum Dysplasia.有限元分析联合经髂骨-骶骨螺钉固定治疗骶骨发育不良所致的骨盆后环损伤
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):337-346. doi: 10.1111/os.13585. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
8
Evaluation of cannulated compression headless screws as an alternative implant for superior pubic ramus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study.空心加压无头螺钉作为耻骨上支骨折固定替代植入物的评价:一项生物力学研究。
Int Orthop. 2023 Apr;47(4):1079-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05710-3. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Transsacral Fixation Constructs in a Type 61C, Zone II Pelvic Fracture Model.4 种经骶骨固定方式治疗 61C 型、Ⅱ区骨盆骨折模型的生物力学比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Oct 1;36(10):503-508. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002381.
10
Does Cement Augmentation of the Sacroiliac Screw Lead to Superior Biomechanical Results for Fixation of the Posterior Pelvic Ring? A Biomechanical Study.水泥强化骶髂螺钉固定后骨盆环的生物力学效果更好吗?一项生物力学研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 16;57(12):1368. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121368.

本文引用的文献

1
Cerclage augmentation of S1-S2 transsacral screw fixation in osteoporotic posterior pelvis ring injuries: A biomechanical feasibility study.经骶 S1-S2 跨关节螺钉固定增强治疗骨质疏松性骨盆后环损伤:一项生物力学可行性研究。
J Orthop Res. 2023 Dec;41(12):2740-2748. doi: 10.1002/jor.25634. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
2
Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study.空心加压无头螺钉(CCHS)作为一种替代植入物与标准 S1-S2 骶髂螺钉固定后骨盆环的比较:一项生物力学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06312-1.
3
Trans-sacral screw fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries: review and expert opinion.
经骶骨螺钉固定治疗骨盆后环损伤:综述与专家意见
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Jul 27;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00333-w.
4
Rate of intraoperative problems during sacroiliac screw removal: expect the unexpected.骶髂螺钉取出术中出现问题的发生率:做好应对意外情况的准备。
BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 15;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0501-0.
5
Accuracy of sacroiliac screw placement with and without intraoperative navigation and clinical application of the sacral dysmorphism score.骶髂螺钉置入准确性的术中导航与非导航比较及骶骨畸形评分的临床应用。
Injury. 2018 Jul;49(7):1302-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.027. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Internal fixation of S1-S3 iliosacral screws and pubic screw as the best configuration for unstable pelvic fracture with unilateral vertical sacral fracture (AO type C1.3).S1-S3髂骶螺钉和耻骨螺钉内固定作为单侧垂直骶骨骨折(AO C1.3型)不稳定骨盆骨折的最佳固定方式
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499017690985. doi: 10.1177/2309499017690985.
7
Biomechanical comparison of augmented versus non-augmented sacroiliac screws in a novel hemi-pelvis test model.新型半骨盆测试模型中增强型与非增强型骶髂螺钉的生物力学比较
J Orthop Res. 2017 Jul;35(7):1485-1493. doi: 10.1002/jor.23401. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Analysis of sacro-iliac joint screw fixation: does quality of reduction and screw orientation influence joint stability? A biomechanical study.骶髂关节螺钉固定分析:复位质量和螺钉方向是否会影响关节稳定性?一项生物力学研究。
Int Orthop. 2016 Jul;40(7):1537-43. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3007-0. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
9
Biomechanical comparison of a transiliac internal fixator and two iliosacral screws in transforaminal sacral fractures: a finite element analysis.经椎间孔骶骨骨折中经髂内固定器与两枚髂骶螺钉的生物力学比较:有限元分析
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015;17(1):39-49.
10
Novel endoscopic sacroiliac screw removal technique: reduction of intraoperative radiation exposure.新型内镜下骶髂螺钉取出技术:减少术中辐射暴露
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Nov;134(11):1557-60. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2076-7. Epub 2014 Sep 11.