Department of Cariology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Str. Motilor 33, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Str. Avram Iancu 31, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 15;59(8):1462. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081462.
This numerical analysis investigated the biomechanical behavior of the mandibular bone as a structure subjected to 0.5 N of orthodontic force during periodontal breakdown. Additionally, the suitability of the five most used failure criteria (Von Mises (VM), Tresca (T), maximum principal (S1), minimum principal (S3), and hydrostatic pressure (HP)) for the study of bone was assessed, and a single criterion was identified for the study of teeth and the surrounding periodontium (by performing correlations with other FEA studies). The finite element analysis (FEA) employed 405 simulations over eighty-one mandibular models with variable levels of bone loss (0-8 mm) and five orthodontic movements (intrusion, extrusion, tipping, rotation, and translation). For the numerical analysis of bone, the ductile failure criteria are suitable (T and VM are adequate for the study of bone), with Tresca being more suited. S1, S3, and HP criteria, due to their distinctive design dedicated to brittle materials and liquids/gas, only occasionally correctly described the bone stress distribution. Only T and VM displayed a coherent and correlated gradual stress increase pattern for all five movements and levels of the periodontal breakdown. The quantitative values provided by T and VM were the highest (for each movement and level of bone loss) among all five criteria. The MHP (maximum physiological hydrostatic pressure) was exceeded in all simulations since the mandibular bone is anatomically less vascularized, and the ischemic risks are reduced. Only T and VM displayed a correlated (both qualitative and quantitative) stress increase for all five movements. Both T and VM displayed rotation and translation, closely followed by tipping, as stressful movements, while intrusion and extrusion were less stressful for the mandibular bone. Based on correlations with earlier numerical studies on the same models and boundary conditions, T seems better suited as a single unitary failure criterion for the study of teeth and the surrounding periodontium.
本数值分析研究了下颌骨作为一种结构在牙周破坏期间承受 0.5N 正畸力的生物力学行为。此外,评估了五种最常用的失效准则(Von Mises(VM)、Tresca(T)、最大主应力(S1)、最小主应力(S3)和静水压力(HP))在骨研究中的适用性,并为牙齿和周围牙周组织的研究确定了一个单一的准则(通过与其他有限元分析研究进行相关性分析)。有限元分析(FEA)在 81 个具有不同骨丢失程度(0-8mm)和五种正畸运动(内收、外展、倾斜、旋转和平移)的下颌骨模型上进行了 405 次模拟。对于骨的数值分析,延性失效准则是合适的(T 和 VM 适用于骨的研究),Tresca 更适用。S1、S3 和 HP 准则由于其独特的设计专门用于脆性材料和液体/气体,仅在偶尔情况下正确描述了骨的应力分布。只有 T 和 VM 显示出所有五种运动和牙周破坏程度的一致和相关的逐渐应力增加模式。T 和 VM 提供的定量值在所有五个准则中最高(对于每种运动和骨丢失程度)。由于下颌骨解剖上血管较少,缺血风险降低,因此所有模拟都超过了 MHP(最大生理静水压力)。只有 T 和 VM 显示出所有五种运动的相关(定性和定量)应力增加。T 和 VM 都显示出旋转和平移,紧随其后的是倾斜,作为有压力的运动,而内收和外展对下颌骨的压力较小。基于与同一模型和边界条件的早期数值研究的相关性,T 似乎更适合作为研究牙齿和周围牙周组织的单一统一失效准则。