• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习框架与卷积神经网络耦合的桥梁裂缝检测效率研究

Research on the Efficiency of Bridge Crack Detection by Coupling Deep Learning Frameworks with Convolutional Neural Networks.

作者信息

Ma Kaifeng, Meng Xiang, Hao Mengshu, Huang Guiping, Hu Qingfeng, He Peipei

机构信息

College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;23(16):7272. doi: 10.3390/s23167272.

DOI:10.3390/s23167272
PMID:37631807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10459108/
Abstract

Bridge crack detection based on deep learning is a research area of great interest and difficulty in the field of bridge health detection. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of coupling a deep learning framework (DLF) with a convolutional neural network (CNN) for bridge crack detection. A dataset consisting of 2068 bridge crack images was randomly split into training, verification, and testing sets with a ratio of 8:1:1, respectively. Several CNN models, including Faster R-CNN, Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), You Only Look Once (YOLO)-v5(x), U-Net, and Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), were used to conduct experiments using the PyTorch, TensorFlow2, and Keras frameworks. The experimental results show that the Harmonic Mean (F1) values of the detection results of the Faster R-CNN and SSD models under the Keras framework are relatively large (0.76 and 0.67, respectively, in the object detection model). The YOLO-v5(x) model of the TensorFlow2 framework achieved the highest F1 value of 0.67. In semantic segmentation models, the U-Net model achieved the highest detection result accuracy (AC) value of 98.37% under the PyTorch framework. The PSPNet model achieved the highest AC value of 97.86% under the TensorFlow2 framework. These experimental results provide optimal coupling efficiency parameters of a DLF and CNN for bridge crack detection. A more accurate and efficient DLF and CNN model for bridge crack detection has been obtained, which has significant practical application value.

摘要

基于深度学习的桥梁裂缝检测是桥梁健康检测领域中一个备受关注且极具难度的研究方向。本研究旨在探究将深度学习框架(DLF)与卷积神经网络(CNN)相结合用于桥梁裂缝检测的有效性。一个由2068张桥梁裂缝图像组成的数据集被随机划分为训练集、验证集和测试集,划分比例分别为8:1:1。使用了几种CNN模型,包括Faster R-CNN、单阶段多框检测器(SSD)、你只看一次(YOLO)-v5(x)、U-Net和金字塔场景解析网络(PSPNet),通过PyTorch、TensorFlow2和Keras框架进行实验。实验结果表明,在Keras框架下,Faster R-CNN和SSD模型检测结果的调和均值(F1)值相对较大(在目标检测模型中分别为0.76和0.67)。TensorFlow2框架的YOLO-v5(x)模型获得了最高的F1值0.67。在语义分割模型中,U-Net模型在PyTorch框架下实现了最高的检测结果准确率(AC)值98.37%。PSPNet模型在TensorFlow2框架下实现了最高的AC值97.86%。这些实验结果为桥梁裂缝检测提供了DLF与CNN的最优耦合效率参数。获得了一种用于桥梁裂缝检测的更准确、高效的DLF和CNN模型,具有显著的实际应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/83f6064482f3/sensors-23-07272-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/28e1c603e329/sensors-23-07272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/567e93344f0c/sensors-23-07272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/e57897250aaf/sensors-23-07272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/12d5194d5790/sensors-23-07272-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/303a985e3bbd/sensors-23-07272-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/d0c5ac379d7b/sensors-23-07272-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/6749a4e68cae/sensors-23-07272-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/d56a58111aac/sensors-23-07272-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/b4e012f9dc97/sensors-23-07272-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/e7d32931291b/sensors-23-07272-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/83f6064482f3/sensors-23-07272-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/28e1c603e329/sensors-23-07272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/567e93344f0c/sensors-23-07272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/e57897250aaf/sensors-23-07272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/12d5194d5790/sensors-23-07272-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/303a985e3bbd/sensors-23-07272-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/d0c5ac379d7b/sensors-23-07272-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/6749a4e68cae/sensors-23-07272-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/d56a58111aac/sensors-23-07272-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/b4e012f9dc97/sensors-23-07272-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/e7d32931291b/sensors-23-07272-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1c/10459108/83f6064482f3/sensors-23-07272-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the Efficiency of Bridge Crack Detection by Coupling Deep Learning Frameworks with Convolutional Neural Networks.基于深度学习框架与卷积神经网络耦合的桥梁裂缝检测效率研究
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;23(16):7272. doi: 10.3390/s23167272.
2
Agricultural Greenhouses Detection in High-Resolution Satellite Images Based on Convolutional Neural Networks: Comparison of Faster R-CNN, YOLO v3 and SSD.基于卷积神经网络的高分辨率卫星图像中的农业温室检测:Faster R-CNN、YOLO v3和SSD的比较
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 31;20(17):4938. doi: 10.3390/s20174938.
3
A comprehensive review of methods based on deep learning for diabetes-related foot ulcers.基于深度学习的糖尿病相关足溃疡方法的全面综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 8;13:945020. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.945020. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Network Object Detection Algorithms for Vehicle Detection.用于车辆检测的卷积神经网络目标检测算法的比较评估
J Imaging. 2024 Jul 5;10(7):162. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10070162.
5
Deep learning-based concrete defects classification and detection using semantic segmentation.基于深度学习的混凝土缺陷分类与语义分割检测
Struct Health Monit. 2024 Jan;23(1):383-409. doi: 10.1177/14759217231168212. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
An adaptive ensemble deep learning framework for reliable detection of pandemic patients.一种用于可靠检测大流行患者的自适应集成深度学习框架。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Jan;168:107836. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107836. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Deep learning based real-time tourist spots detection and recognition mechanism.基于深度学习的实时旅游景点检测与识别机制。
Sci Prog. 2021 Sep;104(3_suppl):368504211044228. doi: 10.1177/00368504211044228.
8
Study on the Influence of Label Image Accuracy on the Performance of Concrete Crack Segmentation Network Models.标签图像精度对混凝土裂缝分割网络模型性能的影响研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;24(4):1068. doi: 10.3390/s24041068.
9
Crack detection for concrete bridges with imaged based deep learning.基于深度学习图像的混凝土桥梁裂缝检测
Sci Prog. 2022 Oct-Dec;105(4):368504221128487. doi: 10.1177/00368504221128487.
10
Crack Detection and Comparison Study Based on Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN.基于 Faster R-CNN 和 Mask R-CNN 的裂纹检测与比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 5;22(3):1215. doi: 10.3390/s22031215.

引用本文的文献

1
Ensemble learning based sustainable approach to rebuilding metal structures prediction.基于集成学习的可持续重建金属结构预测方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84996-8.
2
Study on the Influence of Label Image Accuracy on the Performance of Concrete Crack Segmentation Network Models.标签图像精度对混凝土裂缝分割网络模型性能的影响研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;24(4):1068. doi: 10.3390/s24041068.

本文引用的文献

1
Crack detection for concrete bridges with imaged based deep learning.基于深度学习图像的混凝土桥梁裂缝检测
Sci Prog. 2022 Oct-Dec;105(4):368504221128487. doi: 10.1177/00368504221128487.
2
Crack Texture Feature Identification of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Based on Deep Learning.基于深度学习的纤维增强混凝土裂缝纹理特征识别
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 1;15(11):3940. doi: 10.3390/ma15113940.
3
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks.更快的 R-CNN:基于区域建议网络的实时目标检测。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017 Jun;39(6):1137-1149. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031. Epub 2016 Jun 6.