Suppr超能文献

目标治疗后儿童非系统性幼年特发性关节炎疼痛显著减轻:24 个月随访结果。

Significant pain decrease in children with non-systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis treated to target: results over 24 months of follow up.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands.

De Kinderkliniek, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2023 Aug 26;21(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12969-023-00874-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare pain-scores in three targeted treatment-strategies in JIA-patients and to identify characteristics predicting persistent pain.

METHODS

In the BeSt-for-Kids-study 92 DMARD-naïve JIA-patients were randomized in 3 treatment-strategies: 1) initial sequential DMARD-monotherapy 2) initial methotrexate (MTX)/prednisolone-bridging or 3) initial MTX/etanercept. Potential differences in VAS pain scores (0-100 mm) over time between treatment-strategies were compared using linear mixed models with visits clustered within patients. A multivariable model was used to assess the ability of baseline characteristics to predict the chance of high pain-scores during follow-up.

RESULTS

Pain-scores over time reduced from mean 55.3 (SD 21.7) to 19.5 (SD 25.3) mm after 24 months. On average, pain-scores decreased significantly with β -1.37 mm (95% CI -1.726; -1.022) per month. No significant difference was found between treatment-strategies (interaction term treatment arm*time (months) β (95% CI) arm 1: 0.13 (-0.36; 0.62) and arm 2: 0.37 (-0.12; 0.86) compared to arm 3). Correction for sex and symptom duration yielded similar results. Several baseline characteristics were predictive for pain over time. Higher VAS pain [β 0.44 (95% CI 0.25; 0.65)] and higher active joint count [0.77 (0.19; 1.34)] were predictive of higher pain over time, whereas, low VAS physician [ -0.34 (-0.55; -0.06)], CHQ Physical [ -0.42 (-0.72; -0.11)] and Psychosocial summary Score [ -0.42 (-0.77; -0.06)] were predictive of lower pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-to-target seems effective in pain-reduction in non-systemic JIA-patients irrespective of initial treatment-strategy. Several baseline-predictors for pain over time were found, which could help to identify patients with a high risk for development of chronic pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Registry number 1574.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较三种靶向治疗策略在幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)患者中的疼痛评分,并确定预测持续性疼痛的特征。

方法

在 BeSt-for-Kids 研究中,92 名初治接受疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗的 JIA 患者被随机分为 3 种治疗策略:1)初始序贯 DMARD 单药治疗;2)初始甲氨蝶呤(MTX)/泼尼松桥接治疗;3)初始 MTX/依那西普治疗。使用线性混合模型比较治疗策略之间随时间变化的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分(0-100mm)的差异,其中访视按患者聚类。使用多变量模型评估基线特征预测随访期间高疼痛评分的可能性。

结果

24 个月后,疼痛评分从平均 55.3(SD 21.7)降至 19.5(SD 25.3)mm。平均而言,疼痛评分每月显著下降β-1.37mm(95%CI-1.726;-1.022)。治疗策略之间无显著差异(治疗臂*时间(月)交互项β(95%CI)臂 1:0.13(-0.36;0.62)和臂 2:0.37(-0.12;0.86)与臂 3相比)。校正性别和症状持续时间后得到了相似的结果。一些基线特征与随时间变化的疼痛相关。较高的 VAS 疼痛[β 0.44(95%CI 0.25;0.65)]和较高的活跃关节计数[0.77(0.19;1.34)]与较高的疼痛相关,而较低的 VAS 医生[ -0.34(-0.55;-0.06)],CHQ 身体[ -0.42(-0.72;-0.11)]和心理社会综合评分[ -0.42(-0.77;-0.06)]与较低的疼痛相关。

结论

针对目标的治疗在非系统性幼年特发性关节炎患者中似乎有效,可降低疼痛,无论初始治疗策略如何。还发现了一些与随时间变化的疼痛相关的基线预测因素,这些因素有助于识别有发展为慢性疼痛风险的患者。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册编号 1574。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e92/10464062/f048eb86c276/12969_2023_874_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验