• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人高终末期肝病模型评分患者的活体肝移植:美国经验。

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Adults With High Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score: The US Experience.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2024 Mar 1;108(3):713-723. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004767. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000004767
PMID:37635282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10899524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are not well characterized in the United States.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data in adults listed for their first liver transplant alone between 2002 and 2021. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of MELD score (<20, 20-24, 25-29, and ≥30) and patient/graft survival after LDLT and the association of donor type (living versus deceased) on outcomes stratified by MELD.

RESULTS

There were 4495 LDLTs included with 5.9% at MELD 25-29 and 1.9% at MELD ≥30. LDLTs at MELD 25-29 and ≥30 LDLT have substantially increased since 2010 and 2015, respectively. Patient survival at MELD ≥30 was not different versus MELD <20: adjusted hazard ratio 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.88). However, graft survival was worse: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.68). Compared with deceased-donor liver transplant, LDLT led to superior patient survival at MELD <20 (aHR 0.92; P = 0.024) and 20-24 (aHR 0.70; P < 0.001), equivalent patient survival at MELD 25-29 (aHR 0.97; P = 0.843), but worse graft survival at MELD ≥30 (aHR 1.68, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patient survival remains acceptable, the benefits of LDLT may be lost at MELD ≥30.

摘要

背景

在美国,高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)的预后情况尚未得到充分描述。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用 2002 年至 2021 年期间仅接受首次肝移植的成人的器官获取和移植网络数据。Cox 比例风险模型评估了 MELD 评分(<20、20-24、25-29 和≥30)与 LDLT 后患者/移植物存活率的相关性,以及供体类型(活体与已故)对按 MELD 分层的结果的影响。

结果

共纳入 4495 例 LDLT,MELD 25-29 为 5.9%,MELD≥30 为 1.9%。MELD 25-29 和≥30 的 LDLT 自 2010 年和 2015 年以来分别大幅增加。MELD≥30 的患者生存率与 MELD<20 无差异:校正风险比 1.67(95%置信区间,0.96-2.88)。然而,移植物存活率更差:校正危险比(aHR)1.69(95%置信区间,1.07-2.68)。与已故供体肝移植相比,LDLT 在 MELD<20(aHR 0.92;P=0.024)和 20-24(aHR 0.70;P<0.001)时可提高患者生存率,在 MELD 25-29 时患者生存率相当(aHR 0.97;P=0.843),但在 MELD≥30 时移植物存活率更差(aHR 1.68,P=0.009)。

结论

尽管患者生存率仍然可以接受,但在 MELD≥30 时,LDLT 的益处可能会丧失。

相似文献

1
Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Adults With High Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score: The US Experience.成人高终末期肝病模型评分患者的活体肝移植:美国经验。
Transplantation. 2024 Mar 1;108(3):713-723. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004767. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Outcomes in Living Donor Compared With Deceased Donor Primary Liver Transplantation in Lower Acuity Patients With Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores <30.低危终末期肝病模型评分<30 的患者中行活体供肝与尸体供肝原发性肝移植的结局比较。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Jul;27(7):971-983. doi: 10.1002/lt.25993. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA.美国不断增加高 MELD 评分活体供肝肝移植的实践并获得可接受的结果。
Liver Transpl. 2024 Jan 1;30(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000228. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study.在一个器官严重短缺的地区,对于模型预测终末期肝病评分(MELD)超过 30 的患者,活体肝移植的生存获益:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3459-3466. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000634.
5
Recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study: Comparison of risk factors between living and deceased donor recipients.成人对成人活体肝移植队列研究中的复发性原发性硬化性胆管炎:活体供肝与尸体供肝受者的危险因素比较
Liver Transpl. 2016 Sep;22(9):1214-22. doi: 10.1002/lt.24496. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
6
Survival after live donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: propensity score-matched study.活体供肝与死体供肝肝移植术后生存比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae058.
7
Living Donation Versus Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation for Low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Recipients.活体捐赠与循环死亡后肝脏移植在低终末期肝病模型受体中的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):580-587. doi: 10.1002/lt.25073. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era.在终末期肝病模型分配时代,活体捐赠对肝移植受者生存获益的影响。
Hepatology. 2011 Oct;54(4):1313-21. doi: 10.1002/hep.24494.
9
Living donor liver transplant versus cadaveric liver transplant survival in relation to model for end-stage liver disease score.活体供肝肝移植与尸体供肝肝移植的生存率与终末期肝病模型评分的关系
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):1211-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.024.
10
D-MELD as a predictor of early graft mortality in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation.D-MELD 作为成人对成人活体肝移植中早期移植物死亡率的预测因子。
Transplantation. 2014 Feb 27;97(4):457-62. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000435696.23525.d0.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-based incorporation of key parameters into MELD score for acute-on-chronic liver failure.基于证据将关键参数纳入慢性重型肝炎的终末期肝病模型评分。
eGastroenterology. 2024 Oct 1;2(3):e100101. doi: 10.1136/egastro-2024-100101. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Patient Selection for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.急性慢性肝功能衰竭活体肝移植的患者选择
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Sep-Oct;14(5):101403. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101403. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival Benefit of Living-Donor Liver Transplant.活体肝移植的生存获益。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):926-932. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3327.
2
Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States: Evolution of Frequency, Outcomes, Center Volumes, and Factors Associated With Outcomes.美国活体供肝移植:频率、结果、中心容量的演变,以及与结果相关的因素。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Jul;27(7):1019-1031. doi: 10.1002/lt.26029. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Analysis of Survival Benefits of Living Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant in High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Hepatorenal Syndrome.
高终末期肝病和肝肾综合征模型中活体与死体供肝肝移植的生存获益分析。
Hepatology. 2021 Jun;73(6):2441-2454. doi: 10.1002/hep.31584. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Adult Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant (LDLT Versus DDLT) at a Single Center: Time to Change Our Paradigm for Liver Transplant.单中心成人活体供肝与尸体供肝肝移植(LDLT 与 DDLT):是时候改变我们的肝移植模式了。
Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):444-451. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003463.
5
Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure: Donor Safety and Recipient Outcome.活体肝移植治疗急性肝衰竭:供者安全与受者预后。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Sep;25(9):1408-1421. doi: 10.1002/lt.25445. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.活体供肝肝移植治疗慢加急性肝衰竭
Liver Transpl. 2019 Mar;25(3):459-468. doi: 10.1002/lt.25395.
7
Living donor liver transplantation in high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score patients.终末期肝病模型评分高的患者的活体肝移植
Liver Transpl. 2017 Oct;23(S1):S9-S21. doi: 10.1002/lt.24819.
8
High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients.高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植受者的预后并无不利影响:1000例受者的经验
Clin Transplant. 2017 Aug;31(8). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13006.
9
Living donor liver transplant versus cadaveric liver transplant survival in relation to model for end-stage liver disease score.活体供肝肝移植与尸体供肝肝移植的生存率与终末期肝病模型评分的关系
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):1211-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.024.
10
Outcome of using small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease scores: a single center experience.小体积供肝在终末期肝病模型评分较高的活体肝移植受者中的应用效果:单中心经验。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e74081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074081. eCollection 2013.