• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室中的中线导管。

Midline catheters in the operating room.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Changwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;26(8):1097-1100. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_843_22.

DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_843_22
PMID:37635602
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Among various vascular access devices, midline catheters (MCs) are commonly used in emergency departments, but rarely in operating rooms.

AIMS

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of MCs in the operating room.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study. The medical records of patients who underwent MC placement in the operating room from October 2020 to July 2022 were reviewed. The rates of successful catheter insertion as well as major and minor complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Successful catheter insertions were achieved in 149 of 161 patients (92.5%). The median dwell time of midlines was eight days (IQR: 6-10 days). A major or minor complication occurred in 6.7% of the midlines. The rates of major complications of occlusion, upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and catheter-related bloodstream infection were 1.3%, 0.7%, and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of MCs in the operating room was feasible and safe. Also, the procedure provides an acceptable alternative for replacing central line catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.

摘要

背景

在各种血管通路装置中,中线导管(MC)在急诊科中常用,但在手术室中很少使用。

目的

评估 MC 在手术室中的可行性和安全性。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性研究。回顾了 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 7 月期间在手术室中进行 MC 置管的患者的病历。评估了导管插入的成功率以及主要和次要并发症的发生率。

结果

161 例患者中有 149 例(92.5%)成功插入导管。中线导管的中位留置时间为 8 天(IQR:6-10 天)。6.7%的中线导管发生了主要或次要并发症。导管堵塞、上肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和导管相关性血流感染的发生率分别为 1.3%、0.7%和 0%。

结论

在手术室中放置 MC 是可行和安全的。此外,该操作提供了一种可接受的替代方案,可用于更换中心静脉导管和外周置入中心静脉导管。

相似文献

1
Midline catheters in the operating room.手术室中的中线导管。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;26(8):1097-1100. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_843_22.
2
Safety and Outcomes of Midline Catheters vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Patients With Short-term Indications: A Multicenter Study.短期适应证患者中线导管与经外周置入中心静脉导管安全性和结局的多中心研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jan 1;182(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6844.
3
Variation in use and outcomes related to midline catheters: results from a multicentre pilot study.中线导管使用及相关结局的变化:一项多中心试点研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):714-720. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008554. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center.中线导管:退伍军人管理局医疗中心 3 年的经验。
Am J Infect Control. 2023 May;51(5):563-566. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
5
Comparison of Venous Thrombosis Complications in Midlines Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are Midlines the Safer Option?中线与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的静脉血栓并发症比较:中线导管是更安全的选择吗?
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619839150. doi: 10.1177/1076029619839150.
6
PICC versus midlines: Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters with respect to incidence of thromboembolic and infectious complications.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)与中置线:血栓栓塞和感染并发症发生率方面的外周插入中心导管(PICC)与中置线的比较。
Am J Surg. 2022 May;223(5):983-987. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管在急性心脏护理管理中的有效性和安全性。
J Vasc Access. 2018 Sep;19(5):455-460. doi: 10.1177/1129729818758984. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
Rates of Venous Thromboembolism and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Among Types of Central Venous Access Devices in Critically Ill Children.危重症儿童不同类型中心静脉通路装置的静脉血栓栓塞症和中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率
Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1340-1348. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004461.
9
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局:一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Comparing Complication Rates of Midline Catheter vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较中线导管与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的并发症发生率。一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 18;10(2):ofad024. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad024. eCollection 2023 Feb.