Lyons T Scott, Reason Kyle W, Tolusso Danilo V, Weddle Ariel S
Department of Kinesiology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL, USA.
School of Kinesiology, Recreation & Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Jul 1;16(2):866-874. doi: 10.70252/MBDQ5711. eCollection 2023.
The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if there is a difference in metabolic cost when jumping on platforms of varying thickness, as well as whether a difference exists in metabolic cost between genders exists on the different platforms. Fourteen participants (seven males and seven females) completed three repetitive jumping trials on the DigiJump machine. Each trial was performed at a cadence of 120 jumps per minute and at a minimum height of 1/2″ per jump. Trials were completed on platforms of 1/2″, 3/8″, and 1/4″ thickness. Participants were instructed to jump as long as possible while maintaining the prescribed cadence or until fifteen minutes had elapsed. There were no differences observed in metabolic cost or exertion for all participants or between genders as indicated by oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange ratio, upper leg RPE, or lower leg RPE. There were also no differences for durations of exercise the participants were able to sustain on the machine. However, when comparing data between genders, a significant interaction was observed in total body RPE across the three platforms ( = .009) and in HR on the 1/2″ platform ( = .018). Results from this study indicate that metabolic cost is similar during repetitive jumping regardless of platform rigidity or gender. However, post-trial comments from participants did show preferences towards specific platforms, though this was not apparent in exercise duration.
这项初步研究的目的是确定在不同厚度的平台上跳跃时代谢成本是否存在差异,以及在不同平台上不同性别之间的代谢成本是否存在差异。14名参与者(7名男性和7名女性)在DigiJump机器上完成了三次重复跳跃试验。每次试验的节奏为每分钟120次跳跃,每次跳跃的最小高度为1/2英寸。试验在厚度为1/2英寸、3/8英寸和1/4英寸的平台上完成。参与者被要求在保持规定节奏的情况下尽可能长时间跳跃,或者直到15分钟过去。根据耗氧量、呼吸交换率、大腿主观用力程度或小腿主观用力程度,所有参与者或不同性别之间在代谢成本或用力程度方面均未观察到差异。参与者在机器上能够持续运动的时间也没有差异。然而,在比较不同性别数据时,在三个平台上的全身主观用力程度方面观察到显著的交互作用(P = .009),在1/2英寸平台上的心率方面也观察到显著的交互作用(P = .018)。这项研究的结果表明,无论平台硬度或性别如何,重复跳跃期间的代谢成本相似。然而,参与者在试验后的评论确实显示出对特定平台的偏好,尽管这在运动持续时间上并不明显。