Tarukado Kiyoshi, Ono Teruaki, Doi Toshio, Harimaya Katsumi, Nakashima Yasuharu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Jan 12;7(4):350-355. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0224. eCollection 2023 Jul 27.
It remains controversial whether it is better to continue oral low-dose aspirin (LDA) during the perioperative period in spinal surgery. This study aims to evaluate the safety of continued LDA administration in the perioperative periods of microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) by assessing perioperative complications and clinical outcomes.
We ultimately included 88 patients (35 males, 53 females) who underwent one level of MEL for lumbar spinal canal stenosis from April 2016 to March 2022. Patients who did not undergo anticoagulation therapy were classified into Group A (65 patients), those who stopped anticoagulation therapy at the perioperative periods were classified into Group B (9 patients), and those who continued oral administration of LDA throughout the perioperative periods were classified into Group C (14 patients). Surgery time, intraoperative estimate blood loss (EBL), differences between hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (Plt) before and after surgery, perioperative complications, and cross-sectional area of hematoma and dural sac on MRI taken within 1 week and at 6 months or more after surgery were assessed between three groups. The EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were also evaluated as the clinical outcomes.
There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in operation time, intraoperative EBL, differences between Hb and Plt before and after surgery, and cross-sectional area of hematoma and dural sac on MRI. A case of hematoma removal was confirmed in Group A. There was also no statistically significant difference between the three groups in EQ-5D, ODI, and each domain of JOABPEQ.
The continuation of LDA throughout the perioperative periods did not affect perioperative complications and clinical outcomes of one-level MEL. In MEL, it might be possible to continue oral administration of LDA throughout the perioperative periods.
脊柱手术围手术期继续口服低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)是否更佳仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过评估围手术期并发症和临床结局,评价在显微内镜下椎板切除术(MEL)围手术期继续服用LDA的安全性。
我们最终纳入了2016年4月至2022年3月期间因腰椎管狭窄接受单节段MEL手术的88例患者(35例男性,53例女性)。未接受抗凝治疗的患者分为A组(65例),围手术期停止抗凝治疗的患者分为B组(9例),围手术期全程继续口服LDA的患者分为C组(14例)。评估三组之间的手术时间、术中估计失血量(EBL)、手术前后血红蛋白(Hb)和血小板(Plt)的差异、围手术期并发症,以及术后1周内和术后6个月或更长时间行MRI检查时血肿和硬膜囊的横截面积。还将欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)、奥斯威斯残疾指数(ODI)和日本骨科协会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)作为临床结局进行评估。
三组在手术时间、术中EBL、手术前后Hb和Plt的差异以及MRI上血肿和硬膜囊的横截面积方面,均无统计学显著差异。A组确诊1例血肿清除病例。三组在EQ-5D、ODI和JOABPEQ各领域方面也无统计学显著差异。
围手术期全程继续服用LDA不影响单节段MEL的围手术期并发症和临床结局。在MEL手术中,围手术期全程可能可以继续口服LDA。