• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拓展跨学科性:基于《医学教育期刊名录-24 种》(MEJ-24)的医学教育文献计量学研究。

Expanding Interdisciplinarity: A Bibliometric Study of Medical Education Using the Medical Education Journal List-24 (MEJ-24).

机构信息

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Université de Montréal, École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information in Montréal, Québec Canada, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Aug 22;12(1):327-337. doi: 10.5334/pme.984. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.5334/pme.984
PMID:37636330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10453959/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interdisciplinary research, which integrates input (e.g., data, techniques, theories) from two or more disciplines, is critical for solving wicked problems. Medical education research is assumed to be interdisciplinary. However, researchers have questioned this assumption. The present study, a conceptual replication, clarifies the nature of medical education interdisciplinarity by analyzing the citations of medical education journal articles.

METHOD

The authors retrieved the cited references of all articles in 22 medical education journals between 2001-2020 from Web of Science (WoS). We then identified the WoS classifications for the journals of each cited reference.

RESULTS

We analyzed 31,283 articles referencing 723,683 publications. We identified 493,973 (68.3%) of those cited references in 6,618 journals representing 242 categories, which represents 94% of all WoS categories. Close to half of all citations were categorized as "education, scientific disciplines" and "healthcare sciences and services". Over the study period, the number of references consistently increased as did the representation of categories to include a diversity of topics such as business, management, and linguistics.

DISCUSSION

Our study aligns with previous research, suggesting that medical education research could be described as inwardly focused. However, the observed growth of categories and their increasing diversity over time indicates that medical education displays increasing interdisciplinarity. Now visible, the field can raise awareness of and promote interdisciplinarity, if desired, by seeking and highlighting opportunities for future growth.

摘要

简介

跨学科研究将来自两个或多个学科的输入(例如数据、技术、理论)整合在一起,对于解决棘手问题至关重要。医学教育研究被认为是跨学科的。然而,研究人员对此假设提出了质疑。本研究是对该假设的概念复制,通过分析医学教育期刊文章的引文,阐明了医学教育跨学科性的本质。

方法

作者从 Web of Science(WoS)中检索了 2001-2020 年间 22 种医学教育期刊中所有文章的被引参考文献。然后,作者确定了每篇被引参考文献所属的 WoS 期刊分类。

结果

我们分析了 31283 篇文章,这些文章引用了 723683 篇出版物。我们在 6618 种期刊中识别出 493973 篇(占 68.3%)被引参考文献,这些期刊代表了 242 个类别,占所有 WoS 类别的 94%。近一半的引文被归类为“教育、科学学科”和“医疗保健科学与服务”。在研究期间,参考文献的数量持续增加,涵盖的类别也越来越多,包括商业、管理和语言学等各种主题。

讨论

我们的研究与先前的研究一致,表明医学教育研究可以被描述为内向型。然而,观察到的类别数量的增长及其随时间的增加多样性表明,医学教育的跨学科性正在增强。现在可以看到,如果有需要,该领域可以通过寻找和强调未来增长的机会来提高对跨学科性的认识并促进跨学科性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/abc2cff947c0/pme-12-1-984-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/6d9b29000206/pme-12-1-984-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/0976887551a0/pme-12-1-984-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/abc2cff947c0/pme-12-1-984-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/6d9b29000206/pme-12-1-984-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/0976887551a0/pme-12-1-984-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ed/10453959/abc2cff947c0/pme-12-1-984-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Expanding Interdisciplinarity: A Bibliometric Study of Medical Education Using the Medical Education Journal List-24 (MEJ-24).拓展跨学科性:基于《医学教育期刊名录-24 种》(MEJ-24)的医学教育文献计量学研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Aug 22;12(1):327-337. doi: 10.5334/pme.984. eCollection 2023.
2
Measuring interdisciplinarity of biomedical research, medical specialty performance, and implications for radiology: A retrospective review of 2.6 million citations.测量生物医学研究的跨学科性、医学专业表现及其对放射学的影响:对 260 万条引文的回顾性分析。
Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec;80:322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.012. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Publication output of French orthopedic and trauma surgeons: Quantitative and qualitative bibliometric analysis of their scientific production in orthopedics and other medical fields.法国矫形外科和创伤外科医生的发表成果:矫形外科和其他医学领域科学产出的定量和定性文献计量分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8):1439-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
Bibliometric analysis of core competencies associated nursing management publications.护理管理出版物核心能力相关的文献计量分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Oct;30(7):2869-2880. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13795. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估:资源有限的发展中国家为科学产出做出有效贡献的途径。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Nov;14(6):370-7.
6
The top-cited articles in medical education: a bibliometric analysis.医学教育领域被引用次数最多的文章:一项文献计量分析。
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1147-61. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000780.
7
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
8
Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es).医学教育领域的划分:文献计量研究方法。
Med Educ. 2022 Apr;56(4):387-394. doi: 10.1111/medu.14677. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
Barriers to cross-disciplinary knowledge flow: The case of medical education research.跨学科知识流动的障碍:以医学教育研究为例。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Jun;11(3):149-155. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00685-6. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
10
The Top 100 Articles in the Medical Informatics: a Bibliometric Analysis.医学信息学领域的100篇顶尖文章:文献计量分析
J Med Syst. 2017 Aug 19;41(10):150. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0794-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Open Access Publishing Metrics, Cost, and Impact in Health Professions Education Journals.开放获取出版计量学、成本及对健康职业教育期刊的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439932. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39932.

本文引用的文献

1
The voices of medical education scholarship: Describing the published landscape.医学教育学术研究的声音:描述已发表的全貌。
Med Educ. 2023 Mar;57(3):280-289. doi: 10.1111/medu.14959. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
A survey of automated methods for biomedical text simplification.生物医学文本简化的自动化方法调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1976-1988. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac149.
3
The Wicked Problem of Physician Well-Being.医生福祉的棘手问题。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2022 Jun;40(2):213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of "Conceptual Replication" and "Direct Replication".复制的种类:考察“概念复制”和“直接复制”的含义。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;17(5):1490-1505. doi: 10.1177/17456916211041116. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
Leadership Development in U.S. Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Curricular Content and Competency Frameworks.美国本科医学教育领导力发展:课程内容和能力框架的范围综述。
Acad Med. 2022 Jun 1;97(6):899-908. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004632. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing.文献计量学:学术出版研究方法。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Jun;11(3):173-176. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
7
Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es).医学教育领域的划分:文献计量研究方法。
Med Educ. 2022 Apr;56(4):387-394. doi: 10.1111/medu.14677. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Barriers to cross-disciplinary knowledge flow: The case of medical education research.跨学科知识流动的障碍:以医学教育研究为例。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Jun;11(3):149-155. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00685-6. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
9
Medical Education's Wicked Problem: Achieving Equity in Assessment for Medical Learners.医学教育的棘手问题:实现医学学习者评估中的公平。
Acad Med. 2020 Dec;95(12S Addressing Harmful Bias and Eliminating Discrimination in Health Professions Learning Environments):S98-S108. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003717.
10
Interdisciplinarity in medical education research: myth and reality.医学教育研究中的跨学科性:神话与现实。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Dec;25(5):1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09977-8. Epub 2020 Jun 24.