• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《健康的社会决定因素亚型分析:网络分析与可视化方法》

Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in : Network Analysis and Visualization Approach.

作者信息

Bhavnani Suresh K, Zhang Weibin, Bao Daniel, Raji Mukaila, Ajewole Veronica, Hunter Rodney, Kuo Yong-Fang, Schmidt Susanne, Pappadis Monique R, Smith Elise, Bokov Alex, Reistetter Timothy, Visweswaran Shyam, Downer Brian

机构信息

School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Aug 11:2023.01.27.23285125. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.27.23285125.

DOI:10.1101/2023.01.27.23285125
PMID:37636340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10459353/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDoH), such as financial resources and housing stability, account for between 30-55% of people's health outcomes. While many studies have identified strong associations among specific SDoH and health outcomes, most people experience multiple SDoH that impact their daily lives. Analysis of this complexity requires the integration of personal, clinical, social, and environmental information from a large cohort of individuals that have been traditionally underrepresented in research, which is only recently being made available through the research program. However, little is known about the range and response of SDoH in , and how they co-occur to form subtypes, which are critical for designing targeted interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To address two research questions: (1) What is the range and response to survey questions related to SDoH in the dataset? (2) How do SDoH co-occur to form subtypes, and what are their risk for adverse health outcomes?

METHODS

For Question-1, an expert panel analyzed the range of SDoH questions across the surveys with respect to the 5 domains in (, and analyzed their responses across the full data (n=372,397, V6). For Question-2, we used the following steps: (1) due to the missingness across the surveys, selected all participants with valid and complete SDoH data, and used inverse probability weighting to adjust their imbalance in demographics compared to the full data; (2) an expert panel grouped the SDoH questions into SDoH factors for enabling a more consistent granularity; (3) used bipartite modularity maximization to identify SDoH biclusters, their significance, and their replicability; (4) measured the association of each bicluster to three outcomes (depression, delayed medical care, emergency room visits in the last year) using multiple data types (surveys, electronic health records, and zip codes mapped to Medicaid expansion states); and (5) the expert panel inferred the subtype labels, potential mechanisms that precipitate adverse health outcomes, and interventions to prevent them.

RESULTS

For Question-1, we identified 110 SDoH questions across 4 surveys, which covered all 5 domains in . However, the results also revealed a large degree of missingness in survey responses (1.76%-84.56%), with later surveys having significantly fewer responses compared to earlier ones, and significant differences in race, ethnicity, and age of participants of those that completed the surveys with SDoH questions, compared to those in the full dataset. Furthermore, as the SDoH questions varied in granularity, they were categorized by an expert panel into 18 SDoH factors. For Question-2, the subtype analysis (n=12,913, d=18) identified 4 biclusters with significant biclusteredness (Q=0.13, random-Q=0.11, z=7.5, <0.001), and significant replication (Real-RI=0.88, Random-RI=0.62, <.001). Furthermore, there were statistically significant associations between specific subtypes and the outcomes, and with Medicaid expansion, each with meaningful interpretations and potential targeted interventions. For example, the subtype included the SDoH factors , and , and had a significantly higher odds ratio (OR=4.2, CI=3.5-5.1, -corr<.001) for depression, when compared to the subtype . Individuals that match this subtype profile could be screened early for depression and referred to social services for addressing combinations of SDoH such as and . Finally, the identified subtypes spanned one or more domains revealing the difference between the current knowledge-based SDoH domains, and the data-driven subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that the SDoH subtypes not only had statistically significant clustering and replicability, but also had significant associations with critical adverse health outcomes, which had translational implications for designing targeted SDoH interventions, decision-support systems to alert clinicians of potential risks, and for public policies. Furthermore, these SDoH subtypes spanned multiple SDoH domains defined by revealing the complexity of SDoH in the real-world, and aligning with influential SDoH conceptual models such as by Dahlgren-Whitehead. However, the high-degree of missingness warrants repeating the analysis as the data becomes more complete. Consequently we designed our machine learning code to be generalizable and scalable, and made it available on the workbench, which can be used to periodically rerun the analysis as the dataset grows for analyzing subtypes related to SDoH, and beyond.

摘要

背景

健康的社会决定因素(SDoH),如财务资源和住房稳定性,在人们的健康结果中占比30%-55%。虽然许多研究已经确定了特定的SDoH与健康结果之间的紧密关联,但大多数人会经历多种影响其日常生活的SDoH。对这种复杂性进行分析需要整合来自大量个体的个人、临床、社会和环境信息,而这些个体在传统研究中代表性不足,直到最近通过研究项目才得以获取相关数据。然而,关于SDoH在[具体地区]的范围和反应,以及它们如何共同出现形成亚型,我们知之甚少,而这些对于设计有针对性的干预措施至关重要。

目的

解决两个研究问题:(1)在[具体地区]数据集中,与SDoH相关的调查问题的范围和反应是什么?(2)SDoH如何共同出现形成亚型,以及它们出现不良健康结果的风险是什么?

方法

对于问题1,一个专家小组分析了各项调查中SDoH问题在[具体地区]的5个领域([领域名称])的范围,并分析了所有[具体地区]数据(n = 372,397,版本6)中的回答。对于问题2,我们采用了以下步骤:(1)由于各项调查中存在数据缺失,我们选择了所有拥有有效且完整的SDoH数据的参与者,并使用逆概率加权来调整他们与完整数据相比在人口统计学上的不平衡;(2)一个专家小组将SDoH问题分组为SDoH因素,以实现更一致的粒度;(3)使用二分模块最大化来识别SDoH双聚类、它们的显著性和可重复性;(4)使用多种数据类型(调查、电子健康记录以及映射到医疗补助扩展州的邮政编码)测量每个双聚类与三个结果(抑郁、延迟医疗护理、去年的急诊就诊)之间的关联;(5)专家小组推断亚型标签、促成不良健康结果的潜在机制以及预防这些结果的干预措施。

结果

对于问题1,我们在4项调查中识别出110个SDoH问题,这些问题涵盖了[具体地区]的所有5个领域。然而,结果还显示调查回答中存在大量缺失(1.76%-84.56%),后期调查的回答明显少于早期调查,并且完成SDoH问题调查的参与者在种族、民族和年龄方面与完整[具体地区]数据集的参与者存在显著差异。此外,由于SDoH问题在粒度上有所不同,专家小组将它们分类为18个SDoH因素。对于问题2,亚型分析(n = 12,913,维度 = 18)识别出4个具有显著双聚类性的双聚类(Q = 0.13,随机Q = 0.11,z = 7.5,p < 0.001),并且具有显著的可重复性(实际RI = 0.88,随机RI = 0.62,p <.001)。此外,特定亚型与结果之间以及与医疗补助扩展之间存在统计学上的显著关联,每种关联都有有意义的解释和潜在的针对性干预措施。例如,亚型[亚型名称]包括SDoH因素[因素名称1]、[因素名称2]和[因素名称3],与亚型[另一亚型名称]相比,患抑郁症的优势比显著更高(OR = 4.2,CI = 3.5 - 5.1,校正p <.001)。符合此亚型特征的个体可以早期筛查抑郁症,并转介到社会服务部门,以解决诸如[因素名称1]和[因素名称2]等SDoH的组合问题。最后,识别出的亚型跨越一个或多个[具体地区]领域,揭示了当前基于知识的SDoH领域与数据驱动的亚型之间的差异。

结论

结果表明,SDoH亚型不仅具有统计学上的显著聚类性和可重复性,而且与关键的不良健康结果存在显著关联,这对于设计有针对性的SDoH干预措施、提醒临床医生潜在风险的决策支持系统以及公共政策具有转化意义。此外,这些SDoH亚型跨越了由[具体地区]定义的多个SDoH领域,揭示了现实世界中SDoH的复杂性,并与诸如达尔格伦 - 怀特黑德等有影响力的SDoH概念模型相一致。然而,高度的缺失性使得有必要在数据变得更完整时重复进行分析。因此,我们设计的机器学习代码具有通用性和可扩展性,并在[具体工作平台]上提供,随着数据集的增长,可用于定期重新运行分析,以分析与SDoH相关的亚型及其他内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/7558c4ad48f6/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/a83d0fe8ae9c/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/a1f26d546884/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/01180ccc23fb/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/02c38c80a2b7/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/65fe09ed14bc/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/95da31e2b6e0/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/cc2833a9c120/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/7e35fb71dd17/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/7558c4ad48f6/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/a83d0fe8ae9c/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/a1f26d546884/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/01180ccc23fb/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/02c38c80a2b7/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/65fe09ed14bc/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/95da31e2b6e0/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/cc2833a9c120/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/7e35fb71dd17/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/10459353/7558c4ad48f6/nihpp-2023.01.27.23285125v3-f0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in : Network Analysis and Visualization Approach.《健康的社会决定因素亚型分析:网络分析与可视化方法》
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 11:2023.01.27.23285125. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.27.23285125.
2
Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in the "All of Us" Program: Network Analysis and Visualization Study.“我们所有人”项目中健康的社会决定因素亚型分类:网络分析与可视化研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 11;27:e48775. doi: 10.2196/48775.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Evaluating perceptions of social determinants of health and Part D star performance of Medicare Advantage-contracted primary care providers serving a South Texas market.评估服务南得克萨斯市场的医疗保险优势合同初级保健提供者对健康的社会决定因素和 Part D 星级表现的看法。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 May;27(5):544-553. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.544.
5
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Association of Social Determinants of Health and Their Cumulative Impact on Hospitalization Among a National Sample of Community-Dwelling US Adults.健康的社会决定因素及其累积效应与美国全国社区居住成年人住院的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1935-1942. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07067-y. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic Policy on Social Needs Across the State of Kansas and Western Missouri: Paired Survey Response Testing.新冠疫情政策对堪萨斯州和密苏里州西部地区社会需求的影响:配对调查响应测试。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 25;9:e41369. doi: 10.2196/41369.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Human-Centered Design to Address Biases in Artificial Intelligence.以人为中心的设计来解决人工智能中的偏见。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 24;25:e43251. doi: 10.2196/43251.
2
The Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity.研究计划:数据质量、效用和多样性。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Aug 12;3(8):100570. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100570.
3
Association of Everyday Discrimination With Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the All of Us Research Program.在“所有人”研究计划中,日常歧视与 COVID-19 大流行期间的抑郁症状和自杀意念的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 1;79(9):898-906. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1973.
4
A Framework for Modeling and Interpreting Patient Subgroups Applied to Hospital Readmission: Visual Analytical Approach.一种应用于医院再入院的患者亚组建模与解释框架:可视化分析方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Dec 7;10(12):e37239. doi: 10.2196/37239.
5
Creation of a Mapped, Machine-Readable Taxonomy to Facilitate Extraction of Social Determinants of Health Data from Electronic Health Records.创建一个映射的、机器可读的分类法,以促进从电子健康记录中提取健康数据的社会决定因素。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:959-968. eCollection 2021.
6
The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows.达尔格伦-怀特黑德健康决定因素模型:30 年后仍在追寻彩虹。
Public Health. 2021 Oct;199:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
7
Heterogeneity in COVID-19 Patients at Multiple Levels of Granularity: From Biclusters to Clinical Interventions.COVID-19 患者在多个粒度水平上的异质性:从双聚类到临床干预。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021 May 17;2021:112-121. eCollection 2021.
8
Progress With the All of Us Research Program: Opening Access for Researchers.“我们所有人”研究计划的进展:为研究人员开放获取渠道。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2441-2442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7702.
9
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
10
How High-Risk Comorbidities Co-Occur in Readmitted Patients With Hip Fracture: Big Data Visual Analytical Approach.髋部骨折再入院患者中高风险合并症如何同时出现:大数据可视化分析方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 26;8(10):e13567. doi: 10.2196/13567.