• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating perceptions of social determinants of health and Part D star performance of Medicare Advantage-contracted primary care providers serving a South Texas market.评估服务南得克萨斯市场的医疗保险优势合同初级保健提供者对健康的社会决定因素和 Part D 星级表现的看法。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 May;27(5):544-553. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.544.
2
Evaluating Success Factors of a Medication Adherence Tracker Pilot Program in Improving Part D Medication Adherence Metrics in a Medicare Advantage Plan: Importance of Provider Engagement.评估药物依从性跟踪器试点计划在改善医疗保险优势计划中第 D 部分药物依从性指标方面的成功因素:提供者参与的重要性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):662-667. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.5.662.
3
Physician Perception of Patient Medication Adherence in a Cohort of Medicare Advantage Plans in Texas.德克萨斯州医疗保险优势计划队列中医生对患者药物依从性的认知
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Mar;22(3):305-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.3.305.
4
Enhancing Statin Adherence Using a Motivational Interviewing Intervention and Past Adherence Trajectories in Patients with Suboptimal Adherence.利用动机性访谈干预和过去的依从轨迹提高依从性不佳患者的他汀类药物依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Oct;25(10):1053-1062. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.10.1053.
5
A Pharmacist-Led, Patient-Centered Program Incorporating Motivational Interviewing for Behavior Change to Improve Adherence Rates and Star Ratings in a Medicare Plan.药剂师主导、以患者为中心的项目,结合动机访谈以改变行为,提高医疗保险计划中的服药依从率和星级评分。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):35-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.35.
6
Perspectives of Medicare Advantage Plan Representatives on Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Response to the CHRONIC Care Act.医疗保险优势计划代表对《慢性护理法案》回应中解决健康社会决定因素的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196923. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6923.
7
Do healthcare providers consider the social determinants of health? Results from a nationwide cross-sectional study in the United States.医疗保健提供者是否考虑健康的社会决定因素?来自美国全国性横断面研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10656-2.
8
Medication Adherence to Antihypertensive Triple-Combination Therapy Among Patients Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan.在参加医疗保险优势计划的患者中,抗高血压三联组合疗法的药物依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jun;25(6):678-686. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.6.678.
9
Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in : Network Analysis and Visualization Approach.《健康的社会决定因素亚型分析:网络分析与可视化方法》
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 11:2023.01.27.23285125. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.27.23285125.
10
Combining zip code-based population data and pharmacy administrative claims data to create measures of social determinants of health.利用邮政编码人口数据和药房管理索赔数据来创建健康社会决定因素的衡量指标。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Apr;30(4):364-375. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.364.

引用本文的文献

1
Research agenda for using artificial intelligence in health governance: interpretive scoping review and framework.卫生治理中使用人工智能的研究议程:诠释性范围综述与框架
BioData Min. 2023 Oct 31;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13040-023-00346-w.
2
From access to equity: The devil is in "Z" details.从股权获取来看:细节决定成败。 (注:原英文表述比较模糊,这里是根据大概意思进行的翻译,“The devil is in the details”是个常用表达,直译为“魔鬼在细节中”,意即细节很关键、能决定成败等 ,这里结合前文“From access to equity”意译为从股权获取角度来说细节决定成败 )
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jun;28(6):685-687. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.6.685.
3
Predicting health-related social needs in Medicaid and Medicare populations using machine learning.利用机器学习预测医疗补助和医疗保险人群的与健康相关的社会需求。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08344-4.
4
Association of Social Needs and Healthcare Utilization Among Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries in the Accountable Health Communities Model.可问责健康社区模式下医疗保险和医疗补助受益人的社会需求与医疗保健利用之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3692-3699. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07403-w. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a Social Determinants Screening and Referral Infrastructure During Routine Emergency Department Visits, Utah, 2017-2018.在常规急诊就诊期间实施社会决定因素筛查和转介基础设施,犹他州,2017-2018 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jun 18;17:E45. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190339.
2
Prevalence of Screening for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Interpersonal Violence by US Physician Practices and Hospitals.美国医生诊所和医院对食品不安全、住房不稳定、公用事业需求、交通需求和人际暴力进行筛查的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11514.
3
How Engaged Are Family Physicians in Addressing the Social Determinants of Health? A Survey Supporting the American Academy of Family Physician's Health Equity Environmental Scan.家庭医生在解决健康的社会决定因素方面参与度如何?一项支持美国家庭医生学会健康公平环境扫描的调查。
Health Equity. 2019 Aug 23;3(1):449-457. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0022. eCollection 2019.
4
Social Determinants of Health: A Missing Link in Emergency Medicine Training.健康的社会决定因素:急诊医学培训中缺失的一环。
AEM Educ Train. 2017 Sep 18;2(1):66-68. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10056. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
Measuring and accounting for the Hawthorne effect during a direct overt observational study of intensive care unit nurses.在对重症监护病房护士进行直接公开观察研究时,测量和解释霍桑效应。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Sep 1;45(9):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Beyond a good story: from Hawthorne Effect to reactivity in health professions education research.超越好故事:从霍桑效应到健康职业教育研究中的反应性。
Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):31-39. doi: 10.1111/medu.13122. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Breast and cervical cancer screening among Hispanic subgroups in the USA: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 2008, 2010, and 2013.美国西班牙裔亚群体的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:来自2008年、2010年和2013年美国国家健康访谈调查的估计数据
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Mar;27(3):453-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0718-5. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Vital signs: leading causes of death, prevalence of diseases and risk factors, and use of health services among Hispanics in the United States - 2009-2013.生命体征:美国西班牙裔人群的主要死因、疾病患病率及风险因素,以及2009 - 2013年期间的医疗服务使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 May 8;64(17):469-78.
9
The Relationship Between Food Insecurity and Depression, Diabetes Distress and Medication Adherence Among Low-Income Patients with Poorly-Controlled Diabetes.低收入糖尿病控制不佳患者的粮食不安全与抑郁、糖尿病困扰及药物依从性之间的关系
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1476-80. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3351-1. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
Advanced primary care in San Antonio: linking practice and community strategies to improve health.圣安东尼奥的高级初级保健:将实践和社区策略联系起来以改善健康。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):288-98. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.120238.

评估服务南得克萨斯市场的医疗保险优势合同初级保健提供者对健康的社会决定因素和 Part D 星级表现的看法。

Evaluating perceptions of social determinants of health and Part D star performance of Medicare Advantage-contracted primary care providers serving a South Texas market.

机构信息

CareAllies, Houston, TX.

University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 May;27(5):544-553. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.544.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.544
PMID:33908279
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391142/
Abstract

Socioeconomic factors can have a significant impact on a patient's health status and could be responsible for as much as 70%-80% of a patient's overall health. These factors, called the social determinants of health (SDoH), define a patient's day-to-day experiences. While the influence of such factors is well recognized, who ultimately is responsible for addressing SDoH in health care remains unclear. Physicians and other clinicians are suitably placed to assess SDoH factors that can impact clinical decision making. Understanding Medicare Advantage (MA)-contracted primary care provider (PCP) SDoH perceptions has yet to be fully explored. To (a) understand MA-contracted PCP perceptions of SDoH and (b) investigate correlations between PCP perceptions and their CMS Part D star performances, as well as their hospital admissions and emergency room admissions. Survey data were collected from MA-contracted PCPs serving a South Texas market during 2019. An 8-item survey consisting of short answer, ranking, and multiple-choice questions was deployed at attendance-mandatory provider meetings from August to October. Analyses were conducted to understand the providers' SDoH perceptions. PCP responses were first summarized as frequencies and percentages. Baseline descriptive characteristics of the providers were compared by Medicare star ratings using chi-square tests (for categorical variables) and t-tests (for continuous variables). Group differences in physician beliefs on how SDoH affects patients' overall health (question 1), as well as provider beliefs regarding how SDoH affects patients' medication adherence practices (question 2), were assessed using chi-square and t-tests. Associations of provider SDoH perceptions with hospital admissions and emergency room admissions were also assessed. A Fischer's chi-square test was used to examine associations between how PCPs answered the question regarding lack of consistent transportation (question 3) and emergency room admissions. The relationships between PCP perceptions of whose job it is to address SDoH (question 7) and hospital admissions were also evaluated. The response rate for returned surveys was 89%. Analysis revealed that the top 3 barriers were financial insecurity (24.87%), low health literacy (18.65%), and social isolation (15.03%). However, about 36% of PCPs felt they should be the primary addressor of SDoH. There was a significant association between years of practice and CMS Part D star ratings ( = 0.005). A significant association between responses in belief towards patients' overall health and CMS Part D star ratings was examined ( = 0.047). There was a statistically significant difference in mean hospital admissions with PCP perception of who should address SDOH ( = 0.03). Emergency room admissions was significantly associated with perceptions regarding lack of consistent transportation ( = 0.04). No differences with star ratings were observed. Previous literature recognize safety and food insecurity as key SDoH barriers. However, they were not among the top SDoH barriers in our survey. Future research should examine patient perceptions of SDoH in this population to identify ways providers can better serve their patients. Funding for this study was provided by CareAllies, a Cigna business. Statistical analysis was completed in partnership with the University of Houston. Payne, Esse, Qian, Serna, Villarreal, and Becho-Dominguez are employees of CareAllies. Mohan and Abughosh are employed by the University of Houston College of Pharmacy. Abughosh reports grants from Valeant and Regeneron/Sanofi, unrelated to this work. Vadhariya has nothing to disclose. This research was presented virtually at the AMCP Pharmacist Virtual Learning Days event, April 2020, as well as the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Virtual Poster Symposium, May 26-27, 2020.

摘要

社会经济因素会对患者的健康状况产生重大影响,这些因素可能导致患者整体健康状况的 70%-80%。这些因素被称为社会决定因素(SDoH),定义了患者的日常体验。虽然这些因素的影响已得到广泛认可,但谁最终负责解决医疗保健中的 SDoH 仍不清楚。医生和其他临床医生是评估可能影响临床决策的 SDoH 因素的合适人选。对医疗保险优势(MA)签约初级保健医生(PCP)的 SDoH 认知尚未得到充分探索。(a)了解 MA 签约 PCP 对 SDoH 的看法,(b)调查 PCP 看法与他们 CMS 部分 D 星级绩效、住院和急诊室入院之间的相关性。调查数据来自 2019 年服务于南德克萨斯市场的 MA 签约 PCP。在 8 月至 10 月期间,在强制性参会的供应商会议上部署了一项包含简短答案、排名和多项选择题的 8 项调查。进行了分析以了解提供者的 SDoH 认知。首先总结了 PCP 对 SDoH 的看法的频率和百分比。使用卡方检验(用于分类变量)和 t 检验(用于连续变量)比较了按医疗保险星级评分的提供者的基线描述特征。使用卡方检验和 t 检验评估了医生对 SDoH 如何影响患者整体健康的信念(问题 1)以及提供者对 SDoH 如何影响患者药物依从性实践的信念(问题 2)的差异。还评估了提供者 SDoH 认知与住院和急诊室入院之间的关联。使用 Fischer 卡方检验检查了 PCP 回答关于缺乏一致交通的问题(问题 3)与急诊室入院之间的关联。还评估了 PCP 对谁负责解决 SDoH 的看法(问题 7)与住院之间的关系。返回调查的回复率为 89%。分析表明,前 3 大障碍是财务不安全(24.87%)、低健康素养(18.65%)和社会孤立(15.03%)。然而,约 36%的 PCP 认为他们应该是解决 SDoH 的主要对象。医生的实践年限与 CMS 部分 D 星级评分之间存在显著相关性(=0.005)。在患者整体健康的信念方面,调查了与 CMS 部分 D 星级评分之间的相关性(=0.047)。在 PCP 对谁应该解决 SDOH 的看法方面,住院人数存在统计学上的显著差异(=0.03)。急诊室入院与缺乏一致交通的看法显著相关(=0.04)。没有观察到与星级评分的差异。以前的文献认识到安全和粮食不安全是关键的 SDoH 障碍。然而,它们并不是我们调查中排名前 3 的 SDoH 障碍。未来的研究应该调查这一人群对 SDoH 的患者看法,以确定提供者如何更好地为患者服务。这项研究由 Cigna 旗下的 CareAllies 提供资金。统计分析是与休斯顿大学合作完成的。Payne、Esse、Qian、Serna、Villarreal 和 Becho-Dominguez 是 CareAllies 的员工。Mohan 和 Abughosh 受雇于休斯顿大学药学院。Abughosh 报告说与 Valeant 和 Regeneron/Sanofi 有相关的拨款,与这项工作无关。Vadhariya 没有什么可披露的。这项研究在虚拟的 AMCP 药剂师虚拟学习日活动(2020 年 4 月)以及美国临床药剂师虚拟海报研讨会(2020 年 5 月 26 日至 27 日)上进行了虚拟展示。