Peng Sihui, Yang Tingzhong, Zhang Weifang, Cottrell Randall R
School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, No. 601 Huangpudadaoxi, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
Women's Hospital/Center for Tobacco Control Research, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, No. 1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 11;9(8):e19090. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19090. eCollection 2023 Aug.
An epidemic of a highly lethal disease can overwhelm people emotionally and physically. Little is known about how public mental and preventive patterns changed during the transition from the COVID-19 epidemic to sporadic infection. This study examined changing trends of metal response and behavioral variables, and their impact from uncertainty stress in this process in China. A prospective longitudinal observation design was utilized. There were 7 waves of surveys from COVID-19 epidemic status to the sporadic infection period. Sixty-two participants completed all observation points and were included in the study. The Mann-Kendall Test was used to assess changing trends across the seven observation points. The nonparametric linear mixed effects model was used to examine the association between uncertainty stress and mental and behavioral responses. The mean uncertainty stress did not change significantly over the observation period (Z: -0.911, p > 0.05). This trend was also true for perceived risk, perceived severity, self-efficacy for prevention, and prevention behavior. There was a statistically significant downward trend in irrational beliefs about prevention (Z: -4.993, p < 0.01), sleep (Z: -2.499, p < 0.05), emotions (Z: -5.650, p < 0.01), and lifestyle (Z: -5.978, p < 0.01). The results showed that uncertainty stress was positively associated with irrational beliefs (β: 0.16298, p < 0.01), their sleep (β: 0.02070, p < 0.05), emotions (β: 0.03462, p < 0.01), and lifestyle (β: 0.02056, p < 0.05). High levels of uncertainty stress were negatively associated with self-efficacy for prevention and prevention behavior, β was -1.33210 (p < 0.01) and -0.82742 (p < 0.01). These results may have important policy and disease prevention in post-epidemic times.
一种高致死性疾病的流行会在情感和身体上使人不堪重负。对于在从新冠疫情过渡到散发感染期间公众的心理和预防模式如何变化,人们知之甚少。本研究考察了中国在这一过程中心理反应和行为变量的变化趋势,以及不确定性压力对它们的影响。采用前瞻性纵向观察设计。从新冠疫情状态到散发感染期进行了7次调查。62名参与者完成了所有观察点并被纳入研究。使用曼-肯德尔检验来评估七个观察点的变化趋势。使用非参数线性混合效应模型来检验不确定性压力与心理和行为反应之间的关联。在观察期内,平均不确定性压力没有显著变化(Z值:-0.911,p>0.05)。感知风险、感知严重程度、预防自我效能感和预防行为也是如此。关于预防的非理性信念(Z值:-4.993,p<0.01)、睡眠(Z值:-2.499,p<0.05)、情绪(Z值:-5.650,p<0.01)和生活方式(Z值:-5.978,p<0.01)存在统计学上显著的下降趋势。结果表明,不确定性压力与非理性信念(β值:0.16298,p<0.01)、睡眠(β值:0.02070,p<0.05)、情绪(β值:0.03462,p<0.01)和生活方式(β值:0.02056,p<0.05)呈正相关。高不确定性压力与预防自我效能感和预防行为呈负相关,β值分别为-1.33210(p<0.01)和-0.82742(p<0.01)。这些结果可能对疫情后时代的重要政策和疾病预防具有启示意义。