Suppr超能文献

低强度激光疗法与经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的疗效比较

Comparative effectiveness of Low Level Laser therapy and Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

作者信息

Seifi Massoud, Ebadifar Asghar, Kabiri Sattar, Badiee Mohammad Reza, Abdolazimi Zahra, Amdjadi Parisa

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Summer;8(Suppl 1):S27-S31. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.s6. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are the most common source of pain on the face. There are multiple etiologies, and several types of treatment have been reported. The use of non-invasive and reversible therapies in the treatment of such problems is recommended. The present study evaluated the effect of low-level laser (LLL) therapy and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) on TMDs. In this single-blind study, 40 patients with temporomandibular disorders were randomly divided into four groups: TENS (TENSTem dental), LLL (diode 810 nm CW), shamTENS, and sham-LLL. All subjects were examined and data on pain and tenderness in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscles (using the visual analogue scale) and mouth-opening (distance between incisal edges before feeling pain; mm) were collected before baseline (T1), after each session (T2-T5) and one month after the end of the sessions (T6)), and analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni statistical tests. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. The decrease in pain (=0.000), tenderness (=0.000) and increase in mouth-opening ability (=0.002) was greater in the TENS and LLL groups than in the placebo groups. At the one-month follow-up, significant decrease in pain and tenderness was recorded in the TENS and LLL groups (=0.000). There was no significant differences between TENS and LLL and the placebo groups for maximum mouth-opening at the end of the study (=0.692). Using TENS or LLL therapy can improve TMD symptoms at least for the short term. Although the effects of the placebo played a role in improving symptoms, their effects were less important.

摘要

颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)是面部疼痛最常见的原因。其病因多样,已有多种治疗方法被报道。建议采用非侵入性和可逆性疗法来治疗此类问题。本研究评估了低强度激光(LLL)疗法和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)对颞下颌关节紊乱病的疗效。在这项单盲研究中,40例颞下颌关节紊乱病患者被随机分为四组:TENS组(TENSTem牙科)、LLL组(810nm连续波二极管激光)、假TENS组和假LLL组。在基线(T1)前、每次治疗后(T2 - T5)以及治疗结束后1个月(T6)对所有受试者进行检查,并收集颞下颌关节(TMJ)和咀嚼肌的疼痛和压痛数据(使用视觉模拟量表)以及开口度(感到疼痛前切缘间的距离;mm),并采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和Bonferroni统计检验进行分析。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。TENS组和LLL组的疼痛(=0.000)、压痛(=0.000)减轻以及开口能力增加(=0.002)均大于安慰剂组。在1个月的随访中,TENS组和LLL组的疼痛和压痛显著减轻(=0.000)。在研究结束时,TENS组、LLL组与安慰剂组在最大开口度方面无显著差异(=0.692)。使用TENS或LLL疗法至少在短期内可改善颞下颌关节紊乱病的症状。尽管安慰剂效应在改善症状方面起到了一定作用,但其作用较小。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验