Loureiro Jéssica Muniz, Chaves Victor Carvalho Vitolo, Risso Patrícia A, Magno Marcela Baraúna, Maia Lucianne Cople, Pithon Matheus de Melo
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Dent Traumatol. 2023 Dec;39(6):616-624. doi: 10.1111/edt.12873. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Evaluate the informative content in tooth avulsion videos intended for dentists available on YouTube™ and analyse their compliance with the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines 2020.
Google Trends was used to identify the most searched term for tooth avulsion. Tooth avulsion-related videos in Brazilian Portuguese intended for dentists were searched on YouTube™ with a 12-month filter. Two raters reviewed these videos to extract their features and evaluate and qualify them with two 9-point checklists based on the IADT 2020 guidelines. The emergency steps for tooth avulsion at the accident site were assessed before, during and after clinical management; each step received 1 point if present and 0 points if absent. The final score ranged from 0 to 9 points on each checklist (18 points total), and the total score was used to classify the videos as having poor, moderate or rich content. Reliability and video quality were evaluated by an adapted version of the DISCERN tool and global quality scale (GQS), respectively. The data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-test, Pearson chi-square test, and the Kappa statistic (p < .05).
Of 60 videos, 8 were included. All were uploaded by dental professionals or undergraduate students; the average duration was 11 min (range: 0.40-65 min), and the average number of views was 56.75. Half the videos (50%) had maximum completeness scores for questions about emergency dentist referral before clinical management, and more than half (75%) had maximum completeness regarding the steps required during and after treatment. Rich videos had higher GQS scores (p = .049) without significant correlation.
Although most videos in Brazilian Portuguese were considered high-quality according to the IADT checklist, half of them presented partial absence of information regarding orientations at the accident site.
背景/目的：评估YouTube™上可供牙医观看的牙齿脱位视频中的信息内容，并分析其是否符合国际牙外伤协会（IADT）2020年指南。
使用谷歌趋势确定牙齿脱位搜索量最高的术语。在YouTube™上搜索面向牙医的巴西葡萄牙语牙齿脱位相关视频，并设置12个月的筛选条件。两名评估人员审查这些视频，提取其特征，并根据IADT 2020年指南，使用两份9分制清单对其进行评估和定性。评估事故现场牙齿脱位的紧急处理步骤在临床处理前、处理期间和处理后的情况；每个步骤若存在得1分，若不存在得0分。每份清单的最终得分范围为0至9分（总分18分），总得分用于将视频分类为内容贫乏、中等或丰富。分别使用改编版的DISCERN工具和全球质量量表（GQS）评估可靠性和视频质量。采用曼-惠特尼U检验、皮尔逊卡方检验和卡帕统计量对数据进行分析（p < 0.05）。
60个视频中，8个被纳入。所有视频均由牙科专业人员或本科生上传；平均时长为11分钟（范围：0.40 - 65分钟），平均观看次数为56.75次。一半的视频（50%）在临床处理前关于紧急转诊至牙医的问题上获得了最高完整性分数，超过一半（75%）在治疗期间和治疗后的所需步骤方面具有最高完整性。内容丰富的视频GQS得分更高（p = 0.049），但无显著相关性。
尽管根据IADT清单，大多数巴西葡萄牙语视频被认为质量较高，但其中一半在事故现场指导信息方面存在部分缺失。
