Suppr超能文献

YouTube作为深部边缘抬高的信息来源:可靠性、准确性和质量分析。

YouTube as an information source in deep margin elevation: Reliability, accuracy and quality analysis.

作者信息

Ozdemir Zeyneb Merve, Yavuz Sevim Atılan, Gursel Surmelioglu Derya

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0318568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318568. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The objective of this research was to assess the accuracy, quality, content, and demographics of videos on YouTube concerning deep margin elevation (DME). Initially, 100 videos for each of the three keywords were analyzed. The content categories of these videos were diverse, encompassing educational materials, teaching techniques, advertisements, and other types of content. The evaluation of the videos was carried out based on the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, and the modified-DISCERN questionnaire (m-DISCERN). Non-distributed data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test and the Spearman correlation coefficient. The JAMA score was 1 for four videos, 2-3 for 38, and 4 for 14 videos; the GQS score was 1-2 for 18 videos, 3 for 11 videos, and 4-5 for 27 videos; and the m-DISCERN score was < 3 for 39 videos, 3 for four videos, and > 3 for 13 (for a total of 56 videos). Statistically significant differences were observed only for the JAMA scores when comparing the video source groups (p = 0.001). There were significant positive correlations between the GQS and m-DISCERN and m-DISCERN and JAMA scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). The findings indicated that YouTube videos related to DME generally exhibited high-quality content but only moderate accuracy and poor reliability.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估YouTube上有关深部切缘抬高(DME)的视频的准确性、质量、内容和受众特征。最初,对三个关键词各自对应的100个视频进行了分析。这些视频的内容类别多种多样,包括教育材料、教学技巧、广告以及其他类型的内容。基于全球质量量表(GQS)、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准以及改良版辨别问卷(m-DISCERN)对视频进行了评估。使用Kruskal Wallis检验和Spearman相关系数对非分布数据进行了分析。JAMA评分为1的视频有4个,评分为2 - 3的有38个,评分为4的有14个;GQS评分为1 - 2的视频有18个,评分为3的有11个,评分为4 - 5的有27个;m-DISCERN评分为< 3的视频有39个,评分为3的有4个,评分为> 3的有13个(总共56个视频)。在比较视频来源组时,仅JAMA评分存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.001)。GQS与m-DISCERN以及m-DISCERN与JAMA评分之间存在显著正相关(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.049)。研究结果表明,与DME相关的YouTube视频总体上呈现出高质量的内容,但准确性一般且可靠性较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19c/11805417/d0d24fb22db8/pone.0318568.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验