Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
HUS Shared Group Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 28;13(8):e071743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071743.
Implementing Kaizen can improve productivity in healthcare but maintaining long-term results has proven challenging. This study aimed to assess improved performance achieved and sustained by Kaizen events and find explanatory factors for the persistence or decline of long-term results.
Kaizen events were conducted in 26 specialised healthcare units in a large academic hospital system in southern Finland. Primary data for mixed methods analysis was collected from each unit with 21 semi-structured interviews, Kaizen report files and performance metrics.
Fifteen explanatory factors were found in this study. Work culture and motivation for continuous improvement stood out as the most important explanatory factor for the persistence of long-term results-lack of time for improvement activities and high workload for the decline. Success in preparation and follow-up was associated with sustained long-term results. Thirteen units achieved long-term results, three units could not sustain the performance improvements and five units struggled to make any improvements.
This study explains the long-term sustainability of performance improvements, bringing new insights to Kaizen research. Our findings can guide organising successful Kaizen events. The events can be worth organising even though long-term performance improvements are not guaranteed. Units with supportive working culture and motivation for the Kaizen event will likely succeed. A unit should aim to create a supportive foundation for Kaizen before organising a Kaizen event. Units that lack the foundation can be identified, trained and guided to increase their chances of success. Pitfalls like high workload and insufficient follow-up should be proactively identified and appropriately managed by allocating the required time and resources for the development work.
在医疗保健中实施改善(Kaizen)可以提高生产力,但长期维持成果证明具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估改善事件带来的绩效提升,并寻找长期成果持续或下降的解释因素。
在芬兰南部的一家大型学术医院系统的 26 个专业医疗保健单位中进行了改善活动。通过 21 次半结构化访谈、改善报告文件和绩效指标,从每个单位收集了混合方法分析的原始数据。
本研究发现了 15 个解释因素。持续改进的工作文化和动力是长期成果持续的最重要解释因素——缺乏改进活动的时间和高工作量是导致成果下降的原因。准备和跟进的成功与持续的长期成果相关。13 个单位实现了长期成果,3 个单位无法维持绩效改进,5 个单位难以取得任何改进。
本研究解释了绩效改进的长期可持续性,为改善研究带来了新的见解。我们的发现可以指导成功组织改善活动。即使不能保证长期的绩效提升,这些活动也值得组织。具有支持性工作文化和对改善活动动力的单位更有可能成功。在组织改善活动之前,单位应旨在为改善活动创造一个支持性的基础。缺乏基础的单位可以通过识别、培训和指导来增加成功的机会。应积极识别高工作量和跟进不足等陷阱,并通过分配必要的时间和资源来进行发展工作,进行适当管理。