Bruening Meg, van Woerden Irene, Todd Michael, Brennhofer Stephanie, Laska Melissa N, Dunton Genevieve
Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 27;18(7):e209. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5969.
The majority of nutrition and physical activity assessments methods commonly used in scientific research are subject to recall and social desirability biases, which result in over- or under-reporting of behaviors. Real-time mobile-based ecological momentary assessments (mEMAs) may result in decreased measurement biases and minimize participant burden.
The aim was to examine the validity of a mEMA methodology to assess dietary and physical activity levels compared to 24-hour dietary recalls and accelerometers.
This study was a pilot test of the SPARC (Social impact of Physical Activity and nutRition in College) study, which aimed to determine the mechanism by which friendship networks impact weight-related behaviors among young people. An mEMA app, devilSPARC, was developed to assess weight-related behaviors in real time. A diverse sample of 109 freshmen and community mentors attending a large southwestern university downloaded the devilSPARC mEMA app onto their personal mobile phones. Participants were prompted randomly eight times per day over the course of 4 days to complete mEMAs. During the same 4-day period, participants completed up to three 24-hour dietary recalls and/or 4 days of accelerometry. Self-reported mEMA responses were compared to 24-hour dietary recalls and accelerometry measures using comparison statistics, such as match rate, sensitivity and specificity, and mixed model odds ratios, adjusted for within-person correlation among repeated measurements.
At the day level, total dietary intake data reported through the mEMA app reflected eating choices also captured by the 24-hour recall. Entrées had the lowest match rate, and fruits and vegetables had the highest match rate. Widening the window of aggregation of 24-hour dietary recall data on either side of the mEMA response resulted in increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. For physical activity behaviors, levels of activity reported through mEMA differed for sedentary versus non-sedentary activity at the day level as measured by accelerometers.
The devilSPARC mEMA app is valid for assessing eating behaviors and the presence of sedentary activity at the day level. This mEMA may be useful in studies examining real-time weight-related behaviors.
科学研究中常用的大多数营养和身体活动评估方法容易受到回忆偏差和社会期望偏差的影响,这会导致行为报告的高估或低估。基于移动设备的实时生态瞬时评估(mEMA)可能会减少测量偏差并将参与者的负担降至最低。
旨在检验与24小时饮食回顾法和加速度计相比,mEMA方法评估饮食和身体活动水平的有效性。
本研究是SPARC(大学体育活动和营养的社会影响)研究的一项预试验,旨在确定友谊网络影响年轻人与体重相关行为的机制。开发了一款mEMA应用程序devilSPARC,用于实时评估与体重相关的行为。来自一所大型西南大学的109名新生和社区导师组成的多样化样本将devilSPARC mEMA应用程序下载到他们的个人手机上。在为期4天的过程中,参与者每天被随机提示8次以完成mEMA评估。在同一4天期间,参与者完成了多达三次24小时饮食回顾和/或4天的加速度测量。使用匹配率、敏感性和特异性等比较统计量以及针对重复测量中的个体内相关性进行调整的混合模型优势比,将自我报告的mEMA反应与24小时饮食回顾和加速度测量结果进行比较。
在日水平上,通过mEMA应用程序报告的总饮食摄入量数据反映了24小时饮食回顾法也能捕捉到的饮食选择。主菜的匹配率最低,水果和蔬菜的匹配率最高。在mEMA反应两侧扩大24小时饮食回顾数据的汇总窗口会导致特异性增加和敏感性降低。对于身体活动行为,通过mEMA报告的活动水平在日水平上,根据加速度计测量,久坐活动与非久坐活动有所不同。
devilSPARC mEMA应用程序在日水平上评估饮食行为和久坐活动的存在是有效的。这种mEMA可能对研究实时与体重相关的行为有用。