About the author: Gregory J. Roden has written numerous articles advocating the rights of Americans en ventre sa mere, such as: The Sovereign's Posterity, 43 Cap. U. L. Rev. 585 (Summer 2015); Unborn Children as Constitutional Persons, 25 Issues in Law and Medicine 185 (2010); Roe v. Wade and the Common Law: Denying the Blessings of Liberty to our Posterity, 35 UWLA L. Rev. 212 (2003); and Prenatal Tort Law and the Personhood of the Unborn Child: A Separate Legal Existence, 16 St. Thomas L. Rev. 207 (2003). He notes: I would like to praise God for the many blessings received while doing research for this article and while writing it. I also thank my wife, Claire, for her support throughout this project and my ongoing work.
Issues Law Med. 2023 Spring;38(1):47-60.
The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 is no longer a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction under the Fourteenth Amendment, in light of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, nor ever was under the Commerce Clause, properly understood, per United States v. Morrison.
1994 年的《访问诊所入口法》，鉴于多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案，根据第十四条修正案，不再是联邦司法管辖权的有效行使，从正确理解的《贸易条款》来看，也从未如此，正如美国诉莫里森案。
