Lucero Katie Stringer, Larkin Amy, Zakharkin Stanislav, Wysham Carol, Anderson John
Medscape, LLC, New York, NY, United States.
University of Washington School of Medicine Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States.
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Aug 29;9:e48586. doi: 10.2196/48586.
Despite guidelines recommending the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in certain patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), they are not being prescribed for many of these patients. Web-based continuing medical education (CME) patient simulations have been used to identify clinicians' practice gaps and improve clinical decision-making as measured within a simulation, but the impact of this format on real-world treatment has not been researched.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a simulation-based CME intervention on real-world use of GLP-1 RAs by endocrinologists and primary care physicians.
Two evaluation phases of the CME simulation were conducted: phase I, the CME simulation phase, was a paired, pre-post study of 435 physician learners in the United States; and phase II, the real-world phase, was a retrospective, matched case-control study of 157 of the 435 physicians who had claims data available for the study period.
Phase I CME results showed a 29 percentage point increase in correct decisions from pre- to postfeedback (178/435, 40.9% to 304/435, 69.9%; P<.001) in selecting treatment that addresses both glycemic control and cardiovascular event protection. Phase II results showed that 39 of 157 (24.8%) physicians in the intervention group increased use of GLP-1 RAs, compared to 20 of 157 (12.7%) in the comparison group. Being in the intervention group predicted GLP-1 RA use after education (odds ratio 4.49; 95% CI 1.45-13.97; P=.001).
A web-based CME simulation focused on secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in a patient with T2D was associated with increased use of evidence-based treatment selection in the real world.
尽管指南推荐在某些2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs),但许多此类患者并未得到该药物处方。基于网络的继续医学教育(CME)患者模拟已被用于识别临床医生的实践差距,并改善模拟环境下所衡量的临床决策,但这种形式对实际治疗的影响尚未得到研究。
本研究旨在评估基于模拟的CME干预对内分泌科医生和初级保健医生在实际中使用GLP-1 RAs的影响。
开展了CME模拟的两个评估阶段:第一阶段,即CME模拟阶段,是对美国435名医生学习者进行的配对前后对照研究;第二阶段,即实际阶段,是对435名医生中的157名进行的回顾性匹配病例对照研究,这些医生在研究期间有索赔数据可用。
第一阶段CME结果显示,从反馈前到反馈后,在选择兼顾血糖控制和心血管事件预防的治疗方面,正确决策增加了29个百分点(从178/435,40.9%增至304/435,69.9%;P<0.001)。第二阶段结果显示,干预组157名医生中有39名(24.8%)增加了GLP-1 RAs的使用,而对照组157名医生中有20名(12.7%)增加了使用。处于干预组可预测教育后GLP-1 RAs的使用情况(优势比4.49;95%置信区间1.45-13.97;P=0.001)。
一项针对T2D患者心血管事件二级预防的基于网络的CME模拟与现实世界中循证治疗选择的增加相关。