• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植不合格的复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤治疗方案的成本效益分析——效率前沿方法的经验。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of transplant-ineligible relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treatment options-Experience of the efficiency frontier approach.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2023 Dec;111(6):895-908. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14095. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1111/ejh.14095
PMID:37644352
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) changed remarkably since the European Medicines Agency-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) for the third-line onwards (3+L), and targeted therapies (polatuzumab vedotin-bendamustine-rituximab [pola-BR], tafasitamab-lenalidomide [Tafa-L]) for the second-line (2L) onwards. As associated rising treatment costs represent an economic burden, the cost-effectiveness of transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL interventions was assessed from a German healthcare payer's perspective, using the efficiency frontier (EF) approach.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to determine the clinical benefit concerning median overall survival (OS) of bendamustine-rituximab (BR), rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx), axi-cel, liso-cel, tisa-cel, pola-BR, and Tafa-L. First-year treatment costs (drug and medical services costs) were calculated. Results were merged on two-dimensional graphs illustrating 2L and 3+L EFs.

RESULTS

Second-line EF is formed by BR (median OS 11.49 months, €23 958) and Tafa-L (45.7, €104 541), 3+L EF is formed by R-GemOx (12.0, €29 080), Tafa-L (15.5, €104 541), and axi-cel (18.69, €308 516). These interventions build the respective cost-effectiveness thresholds for novel interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the EF approach, the currently most cost-effective interventions (based on cost-effectiveness ratios) in the indication of R/R DLBCL were identified to guide international reimbursement decisions.

摘要

目的

自欧洲药品管理局批准嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)疗法(axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]、lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]、tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel])用于三线及以上(3+L),以及靶向治疗(polatuzumab vedotin-bendamustine-rituximab [pola-BR]、tafasilumab-lenalidomide [Tafa-L])用于二线及以上(2L)以来,复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗发生了显著变化。由于相关治疗费用的增加代表了经济负担,因此从德国医疗保健支付者的角度,使用效率前沿(EF)方法评估了不适合移植的 R/R DLBCL 干预措施的成本效益。

方法

进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗(BR)、利妥昔单抗-吉西他滨-奥沙利铂(R-GemOx)、axi-cel、liso-cel、tisa-cel、pola-BR 和 Tafa-L 对中位总生存期(OS)的临床获益。计算了第一年的治疗成本(药物和医疗服务成本)。结果在二维图上合并,显示了 2L 和 3+L 的 EF。

结果

二线 EF 由 BR(中位 OS 11.49 个月,€23958)和 Tafa-L(45.7,€104541)组成,3+L EF 由 R-GemOx(12.0,€29080)、Tafa-L(15.5,€104541)和 axi-cel(18.69,€308516)组成。这些干预措施为新的干预措施建立了各自的成本效益阈值。

结论

使用 EF 方法,确定了 R/R DLBCL 适应证中目前最具成本效益的干预措施(基于成本效益比),以指导国际报销决策。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of transplant-ineligible relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treatment options-Experience of the efficiency frontier approach.移植不合格的复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤治疗方案的成本效益分析——效率前沿方法的经验。
Eur J Haematol. 2023 Dec;111(6):895-908. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14095. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
2
Time-dependent cost comparison and health economic impact analysis of second-line interventions for transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma.对于复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的不适合移植患者的二线干预措施的时间依赖性成本比较和健康经济影响分析。
Eur J Haematol. 2024 Sep;113(3):371-383. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14248. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide Versus 3 Rituximab-Based Treatments for Non-Transplant Eligible Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.塔法西单抗联合来那度胺对比 3 种利妥昔单抗为基础的治疗方案用于不适合移植的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:一项匹配调整的间接比较。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2668-2687. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02094-5. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: No Impact of Site of Care.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的成本效益:治疗地点无影响。
Adv Ther. 2022 Aug;39(8):3560-3577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02188-0. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
5
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry.基于真实世界法国登记数据的阿基仑赛与Tisagenlecleucel 治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4282-4298. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02971-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
6
Economic evaluation of polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab tafasitamab-lenalidomide in transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.不可移植的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者采用泊洛妥珠单抗-苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗、tafasitamab-来那度胺联合方案治疗的经济学评价。
J Med Econ. 2021 Nov;24(sup1):14-24. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2007704.
7
RE-MIND2: comparative effectiveness of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus polatuzumab vedotin/bendamustine/rituximab (pola-BR), CAR-T therapies, and lenalidomide/rituximab (R2) based on real-world data in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.RE-MIND2:基于真实世界数据在复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中,比较 tafasitamab 联合来那度胺与 polatuzumab vedotin/苯达莫司汀/利妥昔单抗(pola-BR)、嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法以及来那度胺/利妥昔单抗(R2)的疗效。
Ann Hematol. 2023 Jul;102(7):1773-1787. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05196-4. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel in the Third-Line or Later Treatment Setting for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma in the United States.在美国,对于三线或三线以上复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者,利妥昔单抗注射用偶联物与阿基仑赛注射液和西达基奥仑赛注射液相比的成本效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2355-2374. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02444-x. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
9
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus lisocabtagene maraleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the US.在美国,对于经过二线或多线系统性治疗后复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成年患者,与 lisocabtagene maraleucel 相比,axicabtagene ciloleucel 的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):541-551. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2065787.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis 3L of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel in Japan.日本阿基仑赛注射液与 tisagenlecleucel 和 lisocabtagene maraleucel 相比的成本效益分析 3L。
Future Oncol. 2024;20(19):1333-1349. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-1114. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of critically ill adult CAR-T cell recipients-analysis from a healthcare payer perspective.危重症成年CAR-T细胞治疗受者的经济学评估——从医疗保健支付方角度进行的分析
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Dec 30. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01230-z.
2
How to optimize the CAR-T Cell therapy process? A group concept mapping analysis of preconditions for a frictionless process from a German multistakeholder perspective.如何优化嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)疗法流程?从德国多利益相关方视角对实现顺畅流程的前提条件进行的群体概念映射分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 23;14:1466803. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1466803. eCollection 2024.