• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莱姆病诊断前后马里兰州雇主健康计划中的门诊就诊情况。

Outpatient visits before and after Lyme disease diagnosis in a Maryland employer-based health plan.

机构信息

Lyme Disease Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Johns Hopkins HealthCare LLC, Glen Burnie, MD, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09909-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09909-3
PMID:37644525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10466890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insurance claims data have been used to inform an understanding of Lyme disease epidemiology and cost of care, however few such studies have incorporated post-treatment symptoms following diagnosis. Using longitudinal data from a private, employer-based health plan in an endemic US state, we compared outpatient care utilization pre- and post-Lyme disease diagnosis. We hypothesized that utilization would be higher in the post-diagnosis period, and that temporal trends would differ by age and gender.

METHODS

Members with Lyme disease were required to have both a corresponding ICD-9 code and a fill of an antibiotic indicated for treatment of the infection within 30 days of diagnosis. A 2-year 'pre- diagnosis' period and a 2-year 'post-diagnosis period' were centered around the diagnosis month. Lyme disease-relevant outpatient care visits were defined as specific primary care, specialty care, or urgent care visits. Descriptive statistics examined visits during these pre- and post-diagnosis periods, and the association between these periods and the number of visits was explored using generalized linear mixed effects models adjusting for age, season of the year, and gender.

RESULTS

The rate of outpatient visits increased 26% from the pre to the post-Lyme disease diagnosis periods among our 317-member sample (rate ratio = 1.26 [1.18, 1.36], p < 0.001). Descriptively, care utilization increases appeared to persist across months in the post-diagnosis period. Women's care utilization increased by 36% (1.36 [1.24, 1.50], p < 0.001), a significantly higher increase than the 14% increase found among men (1.14 [1.02, 1.27], p = 0.017). This gender difference was mainly driven by adult members. We found a borderline significant 17% increase in visits for children < 18 years, (1.17 [0.99, 1.38], p = 0.068), and a 31% increase for adults ≥ 18 years (1.31 [1.21, 1.42], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although modest at the population level, the statistically significant increases in post-Lyme diagnosis outpatient care we observed were persistent and unevenly distributed across demographic and place of service categories. As Lyme disease cases continue to grow, so will the cumulative prevalence of persistent symptoms after treatment. Therefore, it will be important to confirm these findings and understand their significance for care utilization and cost, particularly against the backdrop of other post-acute infectious syndromes.

摘要

背景

保险索赔数据已被用于了解莱姆病的流行病学和治疗费用,但很少有此类研究纳入诊断后治疗后的症状。本研究利用美国一个流行地区私人雇主健康计划的纵向数据,比较了莱姆病诊断前后的门诊护理利用情况。我们假设,在诊断后时期,利用会更高,并且时间趋势会因年龄和性别而异。

方法

要求患有莱姆病的患者在诊断后 30 天内必须同时具有相应的 ICD-9 代码和抗生素的配药,以表明其接受了治疗感染的治疗。以诊断月份为中心,设定了为期 2 年的“诊断前”期和为期 2 年的“诊断后”期。莱姆病相关的门诊护理就诊被定义为特定的初级保健、专科保健或紧急护理就诊。描述性统计分析了这些诊断前和诊断后时期的就诊情况,并使用广义线性混合效应模型对年龄、季节和性别进行调整,探讨了这些时期与就诊次数之间的关联。

结果

在我们的 317 名样本中,从莱姆病诊断前到诊断后的门诊就诊率增加了 26%(比率比=1.26 [1.18, 1.36],p<0.001)。从描述性分析来看,在诊断后时期,护理利用率的增加似乎持续存在于多个月份。女性的护理利用率增加了 36%(1.36 [1.24, 1.50],p<0.001),这一增长率明显高于男性的 14%(1.14 [1.02, 1.27],p=0.017)。这种性别差异主要是由成年成员驱动的。我们发现,18 岁以下儿童的就诊率增加了 17%(1.17 [0.99, 1.38],p=0.068),18 岁以上成年人的就诊率增加了 31%(1.31 [1.21, 1.42],p<0.001),这一结果具有边缘显著性。

结论

尽管在人群水平上幅度较小,但我们观察到的莱姆病诊断后门诊护理利用率的显著增加是持续存在的,并且在人口统计学和服务场所类别之间分布不均。随着莱姆病病例的持续增加,治疗后持续存在症状的累积患病率也将增加。因此,确认这些发现并了解其对护理利用率和成本的意义非常重要,特别是在其他急性后感染综合征的背景下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/a865eeba618d/12913_2023_9909_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/1c7582dad532/12913_2023_9909_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/bb72a0301278/12913_2023_9909_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/2e4b891b13b4/12913_2023_9909_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/a865eeba618d/12913_2023_9909_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/1c7582dad532/12913_2023_9909_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/bb72a0301278/12913_2023_9909_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/2e4b891b13b4/12913_2023_9909_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10466890/a865eeba618d/12913_2023_9909_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outpatient visits before and after Lyme disease diagnosis in a Maryland employer-based health plan.莱姆病诊断前后马里兰州雇主健康计划中的门诊就诊情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09909-3.
2
Health care costs, utilization and patterns of care following Lyme disease.莱姆病后的医疗保健成本、利用率及护理模式。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 4;10(2):e0116767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116767. eCollection 2015.
3
Incidence of Lyme Disease Diagnosis in a Maryland Medicaid Population, 2004-2011.2004-2011 年马里兰州医疗补助人群莱姆病诊断发病率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;187(10):2202-2209. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy133.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Classification of patients referred under suspicion of tick-borne diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark.丹麦哥本哈根疑似蜱传疾病患者分类。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021 Jan;12(1):101591. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101591. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care.慢性病患儿的医疗保健利用情况:医疗补助与雇主投保管理式医疗的比较
Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4):E44. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.e44.
7
Longitudinal Transcriptome Analysis Reveals a Sustained Differential Gene Expression Signature in Patients Treated for Acute Lyme Disease.纵向转录组分析揭示了急性莱姆病患者持续存在的差异基因表达特征。
mBio. 2016 Feb 12;7(1):e00100-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00100-16.
8
Epidemiology and cost of Lyme disease-related hospitalizations among patients with employer-sponsored health insurance-United States, 2005-2014.雇主赞助的医疗保险患者中莱姆病相关住院的流行病学和费用——美国,2005-2014 年。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2020 Jun;67(4):407-415. doi: 10.1111/zph.12699.
9
Antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease in Maryland.马里兰州莱姆病的抗生素治疗。
Public Health Rep. 1994 Nov-Dec;109(6):745-9.
10
Epidemiology of Lyme disease in Pennsylvania 2006-2014 using electronic health records.2006-2014 年宾夕法尼亚州利用电子健康记录进行莱姆病的流行病学研究。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Feb;10(2):241-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the incidence of autoimmune inflammatory arthritis after Lyme disease.评估莱姆病后自身免疫性炎症性关节炎的发病率。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2025 Jul 16;74:152797. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152797.
2
Optimizing identification of Lyme disease diagnoses in commercial insurance claims data, United States, 2016-2019.优化 2016-2019 年美国商业保险理赔数据中莱姆病诊断的识别。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):1322. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10195-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Unexplained post-acute infection syndromes.不明原因的急性感染后综合征。
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):911-923. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01810-6. Epub 2022 May 18.
2
Risk of post-treatment Lyme disease in patients with ideally-treated early Lyme disease: A prospective cohort study.理想治疗早期莱姆病患者的治疗后莱姆病风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;116:230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.033. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
3
Use of Commercial Claims Data for Evaluating Trends in Lyme Disease Diagnoses, United States, 2010-2018.
利用商业索赔数据评估美国莱姆病诊断趋势,2010-2018 年。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(2):499-507. doi: 10.3201/eid2702.202728.
4
Estimating the Frequency of Lyme Disease Diagnoses, United States, 2010-2018.估计 2010-2018 年美国莱姆病诊断的频率。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):616-619. doi: 10.3201/eid2702.202731.
5
Post-treatment Lyme Disease as a Model for Persistent Symptoms in Lyme Disease.治疗后莱姆病作为莱姆病持续症状的模型
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 25;7:57. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00057. eCollection 2020.
6
Prospective Evaluation of the Frequency and Severity of Symptoms in Lyme Disease Patients With Erythema Migrans Compared With Matched Controls at Baseline, 6 Months, and 12 Months.前瞻性评估游走性红斑莱姆病患者与基线、6 个月和 12 个月时匹配对照者的症状频率和严重程度。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 15;71(12):3118-3124. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1215.
7
Estimation of cumulative number of post-treatment Lyme disease cases in the US, 2016 and 2020.估计美国 2016 年和 2020 年治疗后莱姆病病例的累计数量。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6681-9.
8
The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review.莱姆病的经济负担和莱姆病干预措施的成本效益:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210280. eCollection 2019.
9
Incidence of Lyme Disease Diagnosis in a Maryland Medicaid Population, 2004-2011.2004-2011 年马里兰州医疗补助人群莱姆病诊断发病率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;187(10):2202-2209. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy133.
10
The Clinical, Symptom, and Quality-of-Life Characterization of a Well-Defined Group of Patients with Posttreatment Lyme Disease Syndrome.一组明确的治疗后莱姆病综合征患者的临床、症状及生活质量特征
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Dec 14;4:224. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00224. eCollection 2017.