• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际电子健康生态系统与对成功价值主张的探索:一项调查研究的结果

International eHealth ecosystems and the quest for the winning value proposition: findings from a survey study.

作者信息

Oberschmidt Kira, van Velsen Lex, Grünloh Christiane, Fiorini Laura, Rovini Erika, Melero Muñoz Francisco José

机构信息

Biomedical Signals and Systems Group, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500AE, The Netherlands.

eHealth department, Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, 7500 AH, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2022 May 6;2:56. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14655.1. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.14655.1
PMID:37645272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10445862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth ecosystems are becoming increasingly important for national and international healthcare. In such ecosystems, different actors are connected and work together to create mutual value. However, it is important to be aware of the goals that each actor pursues within the ecosystem.

METHOD

This study describes the outcomes of a workshop (30 participants) and two surveys (completed by 54 and 100 participants), which investigated how different types of industry stakeholders, namely social services, healthcare, technology developers and researchers, rated potential value propositions for an eHealth ecosystem. Both the feasibility and the importance of each proposition was taken into account.

RESULTS

Interoperability between services was highly valued across industry types but there were also vast differences concerning other propositions.

CONCLUSION

Jointly reflecting on the different perceived values of an ehealth ecosystem can help actors working together to form an ecosystem.

摘要

背景

电子健康生态系统对国家和国际医疗保健日益重要。在这样的生态系统中,不同参与者相互连接并共同合作以创造共同价值。然而,了解每个参与者在生态系统中追求的目标很重要。

方法

本研究描述了一个研讨会(30名参与者)和两项调查(分别由54名和100名参与者完成)的结果,这些调查探讨了不同类型的行业利益相关者,即社会服务、医疗保健、技术开发者和研究人员,如何对电子健康生态系统的潜在价值主张进行评级。同时考虑了每个主张的可行性和重要性。

结果

服务之间的互操作性在各行业类型中都受到高度重视,但在其他主张方面也存在巨大差异。

结论

共同思考电子健康生态系统的不同感知价值有助于共同合作的参与者形成一个生态系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/7adcce112732/openreseurope-2-15830-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/9ba1775c81f9/openreseurope-2-15830-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/91f4c5e52c28/openreseurope-2-15830-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/3656ffd94aa7/openreseurope-2-15830-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/7adcce112732/openreseurope-2-15830-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/9ba1775c81f9/openreseurope-2-15830-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/91f4c5e52c28/openreseurope-2-15830-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/3656ffd94aa7/openreseurope-2-15830-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b80/10445862/7adcce112732/openreseurope-2-15830-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
International eHealth ecosystems and the quest for the winning value proposition: findings from a survey study.国际电子健康生态系统与对成功价值主张的探索:一项调查研究的结果
Open Res Eur. 2022 May 6;2:56. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14655.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Creating value with eHealth: identification of the value proposition with key stakeholders for the resilience navigator app.利用电子健康创造价值:为韧性导航应用程序与主要利益相关者确定价值主张。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 27;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1088-1.
3
Unlocking the eHealth professionals' career pathways: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council countries.解锁电子健康专业人员的职业发展路径:以海湾合作委员会国家为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104914. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: An International Survey of the Experiences and Needs of Healthcare Professionals.老年康复中的电子健康:医疗保健专业人员经验与需求的国际调查
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 5;12(13):4504. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134504.
5
National Development and Regional Differences in eHealth Maturity in Finnish Public Health Care: Survey Study.芬兰公共卫生保健中电子健康成熟度的国家发展与地区差异:调查研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 12;10(8):e35612. doi: 10.2196/35612.
6
Policy and Strategy for Interoperability of Digital Health in Europe.欧洲数字健康互操作性的政策和策略。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:897-901. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220209.
7
From Testers to Cocreators-the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study.从测试者到共同创造者——电子健康解决方案开发中患者成功参与的价值与方法:定性专家访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 6;9(4):e41481. doi: 10.2196/41481.
8
Does the purpose matter? A comparison of everyday information and communication technologies between eHealth use and general use as perceived by older adults with cognitive impairment.目的重要吗?认知障碍老年人对电子健康使用和一般使用的日常信息和通信技术的看法比较。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):897-906. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1821103. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
9
Privacy and Trust in eHealth: A Fuzzy Linguistic Solution for Calculating the Merit of Service.电子健康中的隐私与信任:一种用于计算服务价值的模糊语言解决方案。
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 19;12(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050657.
10
How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study.帕金森病患者和医疗保健专业人员希望如何通过电子健康进行合作护理:共同设计研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 21;22(9):e19195. doi: 10.2196/19195.

本文引用的文献

1
Open health data: Mapping the ecosystem.开放健康数据:绘制生态系统图谱。
Digit Health. 2021 Nov 10;7:20552076211050167. doi: 10.1177/20552076211050167. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Rural Healthcare IoT Architecture Based on Low-Energy LoRa.基于低功耗 LoRa 的农村医疗保健物联网体系结构。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;18(14):7660. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147660.
3
e-Health Technological Ecosystems: Advanced Solutions to Support Informal Caregivers and Vulnerable Populations During the COVID-19 Outbreak.电子健康技术生态系统:在 COVID-19 疫情期间为非正规护理人员和弱势群体提供支持的高级解决方案。
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Feb;28(2):138-149. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0522. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
A multi-stakeholder approach to eHealth development: Promoting sustained healthy living among cardiovascular patients.多利益相关者方法促进电子健康发展:促进心血管病患者的持续健康生活。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Mar;147:104364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104364. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Internet of things in medicine: A systematic mapping study.医学中的物联网:一项系统映射研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Mar;103:103383. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103383. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
6
Why does the NHS struggle to adopt eHealth innovations? A review of macro, meso and micro factors.英国国家医疗服务体系为何难以采用电子健康创新?宏观、中观和微观因素的回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4790-x.
7
Proposal for an eHealth Based Ecosystem Serving National Healthcare.基于电子健康的服务国家医疗保健的生态系统提案
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019 May;23(3):1346-1357. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2834230. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Lessons Learned From a Living Lab on the Broad Adoption of eHealth in Primary Health Care.从一个关于电子健康在初级卫生保健中广泛应用的生活实验室中汲取的经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 29;20(3):e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9110.
9
Progress in ambient assisted systems for independent living by the elderly.老年人独立生活环境辅助系统的进展。
Springerplus. 2016 May 14;5:624. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2272-8. eCollection 2016.