Ghosh Abhishek, Mahintamani Tathagata, Aswathy P V, Basu Debasish, Mattoo Surendra K, Subodh B N, Pillai Renjith R, Kaur Manpreet
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Addiction Medicine,Psychiatry, Lokopriya Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur, Assam, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;65(7):774-784. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_167_23. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
We aimed to assess the service user's acceptability, feasibility, and attitude toward telemedicine practice and compare it with in-person consultation in substance use disorder (SUD).
We recruited 15 adult patients with SUD who accessed both telemedicine and in-person care. We conducted in-depth interviews on awareness and access, facilitators and barriers, treatment satisfaction, and therapeutic relationship in the telemedicine context. We performed a conventional content analysis of the interview excerpts and used inductive and deductive coding. We assumed that social, personal, and logistic contexts influence patients' perceptions and experiences with telemedicine-based addiction care (TAC).
Most participants were middle-aged men (40.5 years, 86.7%), dependent on two or more substances (86.7%), and had a history of chronic, heavy substance use (use ~16 years, dependence ~11.5 years). Patients' perspectives on TAC could broadly be divided into three phases: pre-consultation, consultation, and post-consultation. Patients felt that TAC improved treatment access with adequate autonomy and control; however, there were technical challenges. Patients expressed privacy concerns and feared experiencing stigma during teleconsultation. They reported missing the elaborate inquiry, physical examination, and ritual of visiting their doctors in person. Additionally, personal comfort and technical difficulties determine the satisfaction level with TAC. Overall perception and suitability of TAC and the decision to continue it developed in the post-consultation phase.
Our study provides an in-depth insight into the barriers and facilitators of telemedicine-based SUD treatment access, use, and retention; it also helps to understand better the choices and preferences for telehealth care vis-à-vis standard in-person care for SUDs.
我们旨在评估服务使用者对远程医疗实践的可接受性、可行性和态度,并将其与物质使用障碍(SUD)的面对面咨询进行比较。
我们招募了15名同时接受过远程医疗和面对面护理的成年SUD患者。我们就远程医疗背景下的认知与获取、促进因素与障碍、治疗满意度以及治疗关系进行了深入访谈。我们对访谈摘录进行了常规内容分析,并使用了归纳和演绎编码。我们假设社会、个人和后勤背景会影响患者对基于远程医疗的成瘾护理(TAC)的认知和体验。
大多数参与者为中年男性(40.5岁,86.7%),依赖两种或更多物质(86.7%),并有慢性、大量物质使用史(使用约16年,依赖约11.5年)。患者对TAC的看法大致可分为三个阶段:咨询前、咨询中和咨询后。患者认为TAC在有足够自主权和控制权的情况下改善了治疗获取;然而,存在技术挑战。患者表达了对隐私的担忧,并担心在远程咨询期间受到污名化。他们报告说怀念详细的询问、体格检查以及亲自看医生的惯例。此外,个人舒适度和技术困难决定了对TAC的满意度水平。对TAC的总体认知和适用性以及继续使用TAC的决定在咨询后阶段形成。
我们的研究深入洞察了基于远程医疗的SUD治疗获取、使用和持续接受的障碍与促进因素;它还有助于更好地理解相对于SUD的标准面对面护理,远程医疗护理的选择和偏好。