Semrau Maya, Gronholm Petra C, Eaton Julian, Maulik Pallab K, Ayele Bethel, Bakolis Ioannis, Mendon Gurucharan Bhaskar, Bhattarai Kalpana, Brohan Elaine, Cherian Anish V, Daniel Mercian, Girma Eshetu, Gurung Dristy, Hailemariam Ariam, Hanlon Charlotte, Healey Andy, Kallakuri Sudha, Li Jie, Loganathan Santosh, Ma Ning, Ma Yurong, Metsahel Amani, Ouali Uta, Yaziji Nahel, Zgueb Yosra, Zhang Wufang, Zhang Xiaotong, Thornicroft Graham, Votruba Nicole
Brighton and Sussex Medical School.
King's College London.
Res Sq. 2023 Aug 18:rs.3.rs-3237562. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3237562/v1.
Stigma and discrimination towards people with mental health conditions by their communities are common worldwide. This can result in a range of negative outcomes for affected persons, including poor access to health care. However, evidence is still patchy from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on affordable, community-based interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma and to improve access to mental health care.
This study aims to conduct a feasibility (proof-of-principle) pilot study that involves developing, implementing and evaluating a community-based, multi-component, public awareness-raising intervention (titled Indigo-Local), designed to reduce stigma and discrimination and to increase referrals of people with mental health conditions for assessment and treatment. It is being piloted in five LMICs - China, Ethiopia, India, Nepal and Tunisia - and includes several key components: a stakeholder group workshop; a stepped training programme (using a 'Training of Trainers' approach) of community health workers (or similar cadres of workers) and service users that includes repeated supervision and booster sessions; awareness-raising activities in the community; and a media campaign. Social contact and service user involvement are instrumental to all components. The intervention is being evaluated through a mixed-methods pre-post study design that involves quantitative assessment of stigma outcomes measuring knowledge, attitudes and (discriminatory) behaviour; quantitative evaluation of mental health service utilization rates (where feasible in sites); qualitative exploration of the potential effectiveness and impact of the Indigo-Local intervention; a process evaluation; implementation evaluation; and an evaluation of implementation costs.
The outcome of this study will be contextually adapted, evidence-based interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma in local communities in five LMICs to achieve improved access to healthcare. We will have replicable models of how to involve people with lived experience as an integral part of the intervention and will produce knowledge of how intervention content and implementation strategies vary across settings. The interventions and their delivery will be refined to be acceptable, feasible and ready for larger-scale implementation and evaluation. This study thereby has the potential to make an important contribution to the evidence base on what works to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination and improve access to health care.
在全球范围内,社区对精神疾病患者的污名化和歧视现象普遍存在。这可能给受影响者带来一系列负面后果,包括难以获得医疗保健服务。然而,关于低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中可负担得起的、基于社区的干预措施以减少与心理健康相关的污名化并改善心理健康护理服务可及性的证据仍然不完整。
本研究旨在开展一项可行性(原理验证)试点研究,该研究涉及开发、实施和评估一项基于社区的、多组成部分的公众意识提升干预措施(名为“靛蓝-本地”),旨在减少污名化和歧视,并增加将精神疾病患者转介进行评估和治疗的人数。该研究正在五个低收入和中等收入国家——中国、埃塞俄比亚、印度、尼泊尔和突尼斯——进行试点,包括几个关键组成部分:一个利益相关者小组研讨会;一个针对社区卫生工作者(或类似工作人员类别)和服务使用者的阶梯式培训计划(采用“培训培训师”方法),包括反复监督和强化培训课程;社区中的提高认识活动;以及一场媒体宣传活动。社会接触和服务使用者的参与对所有组成部分都至关重要。该干预措施通过一项混合方法的前后对照研究设计进行评估,该设计涉及对污名化结果进行定量评估,测量知识、态度和(歧视性)行为;对心理健康服务利用率进行定量评估(在可行的地点);对“靛蓝-本地”干预措施的潜在有效性和影响进行定性探索;进行过程评估;进行实施评估;以及评估实施成本。
本研究的结果将是因地制宜、基于证据的干预措施,以减少五个低收入和中等收入国家当地社区中与心理健康相关的污名化现象,从而改善医疗保健服务的可及性。我们将拥有可复制的模式,说明如何让有实际生活经验的人作为干预措施的一个组成部分参与进来,并将产生关于干预内容和实施策略如何因环境而异的知识。这些干预措施及其实施方式将得到完善,以使其可接受、可行,并为大规模实施和评估做好准备。因此,本研究有可能为关于哪些措施有助于减少与心理健康相关的污名化和歧视以及改善医疗保健服务可及性的证据基础做出重要贡献。