• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雌激素受体状态与种族在预测I期乳腺癌患者预后中的相互作用。

The interaction of estrogen receptor status and race in predicting prognosis for stage I breast cancer patients.

作者信息

Crowe J P, Gordon N H, Hubay C A, Pearson O H, Marshall J S, McGuire W L

出版信息

Surgery. 1986 Oct;100(4):599-605.

PMID:3764686
Abstract

As part of a multi-institutional breast cancer data base, 501 stage I, node negative patients have been followed prospectively with a median of 89 months. Patients were treated by a modified radical mastectomy without postoperative therapy. Estrogen receptor (ER) content of the primary tumor was determined in all cases. For the entire patient group at 10 years, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate is 72% and the overall survival (OS) rate is 85%. Both ER value and race (black versus white) were found to be significant prognostic variables for DFS (p = 0.008 and 0.02, respectively) and for OS (p = 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). ER positive patients had a better DFS and OS rate compared with ER negative patients (74% versus 66% and 90% versus 68%, respectively). Black patients had significantly worse DFS and OS rates compared with white patients (64% versus 74% and 75% versus 86%, respectively). Statistical interaction between the ER and race variables was apparent when comparing the similar DFS for ER positive white (75%), ER negative white (72%), and ER positive black (73%) patients in contrast to a DFS of less than 42% at 10 years for the ER negative black patients. An analysis of the data for the ER negative black patients suggested that the postmenopausal ER negative black patients are at particularly high risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer.

摘要

作为多机构乳腺癌数据库的一部分,对501例I期、无淋巴结转移的患者进行了前瞻性随访,中位随访时间为89个月。患者接受改良根治性乳房切除术,术后未进行辅助治疗。所有病例均测定了原发肿瘤的雌激素受体(ER)含量。整个患者组10年时的无病生存率(DFS)为72%,总生存率(OS)为85%。发现ER值和种族(黑人与白人)都是DFS(分别为p = 0.008和0.02)和OS(分别为p = 0.0001和0.01)的显著预后变量。与ER阴性患者相比,ER阳性患者的DFS和OS率更高(分别为74%对66%和90%对68%)。与白人患者相比,黑人患者的DFS和OS率显著更差(分别为64%对74%和75%对86%)。当比较ER阳性白人(75%)、ER阴性白人(72%)和ER阳性黑人(73%)患者相似的DFS时,与ER阴性黑人患者10年时小于42%的DFS相比,ER和种族变量之间的统计学交互作用明显。对ER阴性黑人患者的数据分析表明,绝经后ER阴性黑人患者患乳腺癌复发和死亡的风险特别高。

相似文献

1
The interaction of estrogen receptor status and race in predicting prognosis for stage I breast cancer patients.雌激素受体状态与种族在预测I期乳腺癌患者预后中的相互作用。
Surgery. 1986 Oct;100(4):599-605.
2
Different prognostic value of cytokeratin-19 mRNA positive circulating tumor cells according to estrogen receptor and HER2 status in early-stage breast cancer.根据雌激素受体和HER2状态,细胞角蛋白-19 mRNA阳性循环肿瘤细胞在早期乳腺癌中的不同预后价值。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5194-202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7762. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
Prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in stage III breast cancer patients who had received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy.在接受多柔比星和环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇辅助化疗的III期乳腺癌患者中,bcl-2表达的预后意义
BMC Cancer. 2007 Apr 12;7:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-63.
4
A new look at the prognostic value of the estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors in breast cancer tissue.乳腺癌组织中雌激素、孕激素及表皮生长因子受体预后价值的新视角。
Neoplasma. 2005;52(1):10-7.
5
Identifying good prognosis group of breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes for adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy.确定腋窝淋巴结1 - 3个阳性的乳腺癌患者中可从辅助性环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5 - 氟尿嘧啶(CMF)化疗中获益的预后良好组。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep;35(9):514-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi143.
6
Progesterone and estrogen receptors as prognostic variables in breast cancer.孕激素和雌激素受体作为乳腺癌的预后变量
Cancer Res. 1983 Jun;43(6):2985-90.
7
Prognostic value of c-erbB2 expression in breast cancer.c-erbB2表达在乳腺癌中的预后价值。
J Surg Oncol. 2002 Apr;79(4):216-23. doi: 10.1002/jso.10079.
8
Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone has no adverse impact on the survival of patients with breast cancer.单独进行前哨淋巴结活检对乳腺癌患者的生存没有不利影响。
Breast J. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5 Suppl 2):S157-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00329.x.
9
Prognostic markers in node-negative breast cancer: a prospective study.腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的预后标志物:一项前瞻性研究。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2004 May;59(1):24-31. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20003.
10
Enhanced prediction of breast cancer prognosis by evaluating expression of p53 and prostate-specific antigen in combination.通过联合评估p53和前列腺特异性抗原的表达增强乳腺癌预后预测
Br J Cancer. 1999 Oct;81(3):490-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690720.

引用本文的文献

1
ER and PI3K Pathway Activity in Primary ER Positive Breast Cancer Is Associated with Progression-Free Survival of Metastatic Patients under First-Line Tamoxifen.原发性雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌中的雌激素受体和磷脂酰肌醇-3激酶信号通路活性与一线他莫昔芬治疗下转移性患者的无进展生存期相关。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 27;12(4):802. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040802.
2
How many diseases is triple negative breast cancer: the protagonism of the immune microenvironment.三阴性乳腺癌有多少种疾病:免疫微环境的主导作用
ESMO Open. 2017 Sep 14;2(4):e000208. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000208. eCollection 2017.
3
Breast cancer survival among economically disadvantaged women: the influences of delayed diagnosis and treatment on mortality.
经济弱势女性的乳腺癌生存率:延迟诊断和治疗对死亡率的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Oct;17(10):2882-90. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0221. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
4
Race/ethnicity and breast cancer estrogen receptor status: impact of class, missing data, and modeling assumptions.种族/民族与乳腺癌雌激素受体状态:阶层、缺失数据及建模假设的影响
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Dec;19(10):1305-18. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9202-1. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
5
Breast cancer risk factors in African-American women: the Howard University Tumor Registry experience.非裔美国女性的乳腺癌风险因素:霍华德大学肿瘤登记处的经验。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1993 Dec;85(12):931-9.
6
The prognostic significance of race and survival from breast cancer: a model for assessing the reliability of reported survival differences.种族与乳腺癌生存的预后意义:一种评估所报告生存差异可靠性的模型
J Natl Med Assoc. 1995 Mar;87(3):214-9.