• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability.神经疾病和安乐死医疗援助:安乐死法律基于残疾制造了一个病人的下层阶级。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):5-15. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105422. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Medical Aid in Dying, Hastened Death, and Suicide: A Qualitative Study of Hospice Professionals' Experiences From Washington State.医疗辅助死亡、加速死亡和自杀:对华盛顿州临终关怀专业人员经验的定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Mar;59(3):679-686.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.021. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Permit Assisted Self-Administration: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability.许可辅助自我给药:对关于神经系统疾病和医疗协助死亡的公开同行评论的回应:协助死亡法基于残疾创造了一个患者下层阶级。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):W9-W14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2246340. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
[The right to die and assisted suicide: Review and critical analysis].[死亡权利与协助自杀:综述与批判性分析]
Encephale. 2022 Apr;48(2):196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
Aid-in-dying laws and the physician's duty to inform.协助自杀法与医生的告知义务。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):666-669. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103936. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.“临终关怀”组织诉华盛顿州案
Fed Report. 1995 Mar 9;49:586-97.
7
Words Matter: Why Distinguishing Medical Aid in Dying From Suicide Should Matter to a Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrist.用词需谨慎:为什么区分医疗协助自杀和自杀对于联络会诊精神科医生很重要。
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2024 Jul-Aug;65(4):388-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Assisted suicide laws create discriminatory double standard for who gets suicide prevention and who gets suicide assistance: Not Dead Yet responds to Autonomy, Inc.辅助自杀法律为谁接受自杀预防和谁接受自杀协助制造了歧视性的双重标准:未死先活组织回应自主公司
Disabil Health J. 2010 Jan;3(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.09.004.
9
Trends in Medical Aid in Dying in Oregon and Washington.俄勒冈州和华盛顿州医疗辅助死亡趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198648. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8648.
10
How Should Physicians Care for Dying Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis?医生应如何照顾患有肌萎缩侧索硬化症的临终患者?
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):E690-698. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.690.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurology and physician-assisted suicide: position of the Italian society of neurology.神经病学与医生协助自杀:意大利神经病学学会的立场
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun;46(6):2371-2379. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08038-5. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
Actual needs of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a qualitative study from Wuhan, China.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的实际需求:来自中国武汉的一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 22;24(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01684-8.
3
Conscience-Based Barriers to Medical Aid in Dying: A Survey of Colorado Physicians.基于良知的临终医疗援助障碍:科罗拉多州医生的一项调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3138-3145. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08782-y. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
No (true) right to die: barriers in access to physician-assisted death in case of psychiatric disease, advanced dementia or multiple geriatric syndromes in the Netherlands.在荷兰,患有精神疾病、晚期痴呆症或多种老年综合病症的情况下,(真正的)死亡权难以实现:在获取医生协助自杀的机会方面存在障碍。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Jun;27(2):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10190-8. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
What Does True Equality in Assisted Dying Require?辅助死亡中的真正平等需要什么?
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2244318.
6
Distinguishing "Reasonable Accommodation" From Physical Assistance in Aid-in-Dying.区分“合理便利”与协助自杀中的身体协助。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237474.

本文引用的文献

1
US Physicians' Knowledge About The Americans With Disabilities Act And Accommodation Of Patients With Disability.美国医生对《美国残疾人法案》的了解及对残疾患者的照顾。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jan;41(1):96-104. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01136.
2
A model state act to authorize and regulate physician-assisted suicide.一项授权并规范医生协助自杀行为的模范州法案。
Harvard J Legis. 1996 Winter;33(1):1-34.
3
Assisted suicide: can we learn from Germany?协助自杀:我们能从德国学到什么?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Mar-Apr;22(2):44-51.

神经疾病和安乐死医疗援助:安乐死法律基于残疾制造了一个病人的下层阶级。

Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability.

机构信息

Chair, American Clinicians Academy on Medical Aid in Dying.

Mitchell Hamline School of Law.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):5-15. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105422. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2022.2105422
PMID:35972304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9931932/
Abstract

Terminally ill patients in 10 states plus Washington, D.C. have the right to take prescribed medications to end their lives (medical aid in dying). But otherwise-eligible patients with neuromuscular disabilities (ALS and other illnesses) are excluded if they are physically unable to "self-administer" the medications . This exclusion is incompatible with disability rights laws that mandate assistance to provide equal access to health care. This contradiction between aid-in-dying laws and disability rights laws can force patients and clinicians into violating one or the other, potentially creating an underclass of patients denied medical care that is available to those with other (less physically disabling) terminal illnesses. The immediacy of this issue is demonstrated by a lawsuit in Federal court filed in August 2021, requesting assistance in self-administration for terminally ill patients with neuromuscular diseases. This paper discusses the background of this conflict, the ethical issues at the heart of the dilemma, and recommends potential remedies.

摘要

10 个州加上华盛顿特区的绝症患者有权服用规定的药物来结束自己的生命(医疗辅助自杀)。但是,如果患有神经肌肉疾病(ALS 和其他疾病)的其他符合条件的患者由于身体无法“自行给药”而被排除在外。这种排除与要求提供协助以平等获得医疗保健的残疾权利法相冲突。协助自杀法与残疾权利法之间的这种矛盾可能迫使患者和临床医生违反其中一项法律,从而有可能制造出一个被剥夺医疗的病人阶层,而这些病人本可以获得其他(身体残疾程度较低的)绝症患者所拥有的医疗服务。2021 年 8 月在联邦法院提起的一起诉讼突显了这个问题的紧迫性,该诉讼要求为患有神经肌肉疾病的绝症患者提供自我管理方面的协助。本文讨论了这一冲突的背景、困境核心的伦理问题,并提出了潜在的补救措施。