• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募历史上代表性不足的个体参与 ECHO 糖尿病项目:利用障碍分析了解美国临床研究中的差异。

Recruiting historically under-represented individuals into Project ECHO Diabetes: using barrier analysis to understand disparities in clinical research in the USA.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e072546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072546.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072546
PMID:37648378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10471869/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Individuals under-recruited in diabetes research studies include those not seen at endocrinology centres and those from rural, low socioeconomic and/or under-represented racial/ethnic groups. The purpose of this descriptive analysis is to detail recruitment and retention efforts of Project ECHO Diabetes clinical sites affiliated with Stanford University and University of Florida.

DESIGN

Prospective collection of participant engagement and qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators of research engagement within Project ECHO Diabetes, a virtual tele-education programme for healthcare providers in the management of individuals with insulin-requiring diabetes.

SETTING

Data were collected at the patient level, provider level and clinic level between 1 May 2021 and 31 July 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants and study personnel were recruited from 33 Project ECHO Diabetes sites in California and Florida.

OUTCOMES

We report study completion rates for participants recruited into 33 Project ECHO Diabetes sites. Using barrier analysis, a methodology designed for the real-time assessment of interventions and system processes to identify barriers and facilitators, study personnel identified significant barriers to recruitment and retention and mapped them to actionable solutions.

RESULTS

In total, 872 participants (California n=495, Florida n=377) were recruited with differing recruitment rates by site (California=52.7%, Florida=21.5%). Barrier analysis identified lack of trust, unreliable contact information, communication issues and institutional review board (IRB) requirements as key recruitment barriers. Culturally congruent staff, community health centre (CHC) support, adequate funding and consent process flexibility were solutions to address recruitment challenges. Barriers to retention were inconsistent postal access, haemoglobin A1c kit collection challenges, COVID-19 pandemic and broadband/connectivity issues. Additional funding supporting research staff and analogue communication methods were identified as solutions address barriers to retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Funded partnerships with CHCs, trusted by their local communities, were key in our recruitment and retention strategies. IRB consent process flexibility reduced barriers to recruitment. Recruiting historically under-represented populations is feasible with funding aimed to address structural barriers to research participation.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病研究中招募不足的人群包括未在内分泌中心就诊的人群以及来自农村、社会经济水平较低和/或代表性不足的种族/民族群体的人群。本描述性分析的目的是详细介绍斯坦福大学和佛罗里达大学附属 ECHO 糖尿病项目临床站点的招募和保留工作。

设计

前瞻性收集参与情况,并对 ECHO 糖尿病项目(针对需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者管理的医疗保健提供者的虚拟远程教育计划)中研究参与的障碍和促进因素进行定性分析。

设置

数据于 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日在患者、提供者和诊所层面收集。

参与者

参与者和研究人员来自加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州的 33 个 ECHO 糖尿病项目。

结果

我们报告了 33 个 ECHO 糖尿病项目中招募的参与者的研究完成率。使用障碍分析(一种旨在实时评估干预措施和系统流程以识别障碍和促进因素的方法),研究人员确定了招募和保留的重大障碍,并将其映射到可操作的解决方案上。

结果

共有 872 名参与者(加利福尼亚州 495 名,佛罗里达州 377 名)被招募,各站点的招募率不同(加利福尼亚州 52.7%,佛罗里达州 21.5%)。障碍分析确定缺乏信任、不可靠的联系信息、沟通问题和机构审查委员会(IRB)要求是招募的主要障碍。具有文化一致性的员工、社区健康中心(CHC)支持、充足的资金和同意书流程灵活性是解决招募挑战的方法。保留的障碍是不一致的邮政访问、糖化血红蛋白试剂盒收集挑战、COVID-19 大流行和宽带/连接问题。确定额外的资金支持研究人员和模拟通信方法是解决保留障碍的方法。

结论

与 CHC 建立资金合作伙伴关系,这些 CHC 受到当地社区的信任,是我们招募和保留策略的关键。IRB 同意书流程的灵活性降低了招募的障碍。通过为解决研究参与的结构性障碍提供资金,招募历史上代表性不足的人群是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/9af5f3de9e9b/bmjopen-2023-072546f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/31463436b443/bmjopen-2023-072546f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/43626b195317/bmjopen-2023-072546f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/9af5f3de9e9b/bmjopen-2023-072546f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/31463436b443/bmjopen-2023-072546f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/43626b195317/bmjopen-2023-072546f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5898/10471869/9af5f3de9e9b/bmjopen-2023-072546f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Recruiting historically under-represented individuals into Project ECHO Diabetes: using barrier analysis to understand disparities in clinical research in the USA.招募历史上代表性不足的个体参与 ECHO 糖尿病项目:利用障碍分析了解美国临床研究中的差异。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e072546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072546.
2
Democratizing type 1 diabetes specialty care in the primary care setting to reduce health disparities: project extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) T1D.将 1 型糖尿病专科护理在基层医疗环境中普及化,以减少健康差距:社区医疗保健结果(ECHO)T1D 项目扩展。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Jul;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002262.
3
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
4
Lessons learned obtaining informed consent in research with vulnerable populations in community health center settings.在社区卫生中心环境中对弱势群体进行研究时获取知情同意的经验教训。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Nov 7;5:624. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-624.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
The effectiveness and acceptability of multimedia information when recruiting children and young people to trials: the TRECA meta-analysis of SWATs.招募儿童和青少年参与试验时多媒体信息的效果和可接受性:SWAT 的 TRECA 荟萃分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(24):1-112. doi: 10.3310/HTPM3841.
7
8
Patient and caregiver perspectives on virtual care: a patient-oriented qualitative study.患者和照护者对虚拟医疗的看法:一项以患者为导向的定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 1;10(1):E165-E172. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210065. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Comparison of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Location Diversity of Participants Enrolled in Clinic-Based vs 2 Remote COVID-19 Clinical Trials.比较诊所招募的参与者和 2 项远程 COVID-19 临床试验参与者在种族、民族和地理位置多样性方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48325.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in access to and use of diabetes technologies and therapeutics: a narrative review.糖尿病技术与治疗方法在获取和使用方面的差异:一项叙述性综述
Diabetologia. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06494-4.
2
Peer Mentoring Improves Diabetes Technology Use and Reduces Diabetes Distress Among Underserved Communities: Outcomes of a Pilot Diabetes Support Coach Intervention.同伴辅导可改善糖尿病技术的使用并减轻弱势群体中的糖尿病困扰:糖尿病支持教练试点干预的结果
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Jul 9;2025:1970247. doi: 10.1155/jdr/1970247. eCollection 2025.
3
Project ECHO Diabetes Trial Improves Outcomes for Medically Underserved People.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of comprehensive recruitment strategies in the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: A comparative effectiveness study (GRADE) multi-center clinical trial.采用综合招聘策略降低糖尿病患者血糖:一项比较有效性研究(GRADE)多中心临床试验。
Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;20(5):546-558. doi: 10.1177/17407745231175919. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
2
An Evaluation of Point-of-Care HbA1c, HbA1c Home Kits, and Glucose Management Indicator: Potential Solutions for Telehealth Glycemic Assessments.即时糖化血红蛋白、糖化血红蛋白家庭检测试剂盒及血糖管理指标的评估:远程医疗血糖评估的潜在解决方案
Diabetology (Basel). 2022 Sep;3(3):494-501. doi: 10.3390/diabetology3030037. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
ECHO糖尿病试验改善了医疗服务不足人群的治疗效果。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Feb 1;48(2):243-250. doi: 10.2337/dc24-2100.
4
Strategies to Implement a Community-Based, Longitudinal Cohort Study: The Whole Communities-Whole Health Case Study.实施基于社区的纵向队列研究的策略:全社区-全健康案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 5;8:e60368. doi: 10.2196/60368.
5
Using Artificial Intelligence-informed Experience-Based Co-Design (AI-EBCD) to create a virtual reality-based mindfulness application to reduce diabetes distress: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study.利用人工智能启发的基于经验的共同设计(AI-EBCD)创建基于虚拟现实的正念应用程序以减少糖尿病困扰:一项混合方法可行性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e088576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088576.
6
Strategies for Equitable Recruitment to Engage Underrepresented Youth and Their Families into Clinical Research: Findings from the BEAD-T1D Pilot Study.公平招募代表性不足的青少年及其家庭参与临床研究的策略:BEAD-T1D试点研究的结果
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024 Oct 4:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000541774.
7
Discordance Between Clinician and Person-With-Diabetes Perceptions Regarding Technology Barriers and Benefits.临床医生与糖尿病患者在技术障碍和益处认知上的不一致。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):18-26. doi: 10.1177/19322968241285045. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
8
Not all healthcare inequities in diabetes are equal: a comparison of two medically underserved cohorts.并非所有糖尿病医疗不公平现象都是平等的:两个医疗资源不足群体的比较。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Sep 5;12(4):e004229. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004229.
9
COVID-19 impacts and inequities among underserved communities with diabetes.2019冠状病毒病对糖尿病患者未得到充分服务社区的影响及不平等现象。
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2024 Mar 19;36:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100337. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Making a Good Thing Even Better: Expanding Access and Applicability of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems to Benefit All Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.让好事更上一层楼:扩大自动胰岛素输送系统的可及性和适用性,使所有1型糖尿病青少年受益。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Dec 1;46(12):2126-2128. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0057.
Enrollment of underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in the Rare and Atypical Diabetes Network (RADIANT).
少数族裔在罕见和非典型糖尿病网络(RADIANT)中的登记情况。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 23;7(1):e47. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.529. eCollection 2023.
4
Using Peer Power to Reduce Health Disparities: Implementation of a Diabetes Support Coach Program in Federally Qualified Health Centers.利用同伴力量减少健康差距:在联邦合格健康中心实施糖尿病支持教练项目
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Summer;35(3):295-303. doi: 10.2337/dsi22-0004. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
5
Exploring ethnic representativeness in diabetes clinical trial enrolment from 2000 to 2020: a chronological survey.探究 2000 年至 2020 年期间糖尿病临床试验纳入对象的种族代表性:一项时间序列调查。
Diabetologia. 2022 Sep;65(9):1461-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05736-z. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
6
Improving the enrollment of women and racially/ethnically diverse populations in cardiovascular clinical trials: An ASPC practice statement.提高女性及种族/民族多样化人群参与心血管临床试验的比例:美国心脏病学会实践声明
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Aug 20;8:100250. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100250. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Diversity in clinical trials: an opportunity and imperative for community engagement.临床试验中的多样性:社区参与的机遇与必要条件。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):605-607. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00228-4.
8
Democratizing type 1 diabetes specialty care in the primary care setting to reduce health disparities: project extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) T1D.将 1 型糖尿病专科护理在基层医疗环境中普及化,以减少健康差距:社区医疗保健结果(ECHO)T1D 项目扩展。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Jul;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002262.
9
Transitioning to Remote Recruitment and Intervention: A Tale of Two Palliative Care Research Studies Enrolling Underserved Populations During COVID-19.过渡到远程招募和干预:COVID-19 期间招募服务不足人群的两项姑息治疗研究
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jan;63(1):151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
10
Inequity in Racial-Ethnic Representation in Randomized Controlled Trials of Diabetes Technologies in Type 1 Diabetes: Critical Need for New Standards.1型糖尿病糖尿病技术随机对照试验中种族-民族代表性的不平等:对新标准的迫切需求
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun;44(6):e121-e123. doi: 10.2337/dc20-3063. Epub 2021 May 20.