• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可穿戴设备连续监测颈动脉支架置入术围手术期心率变化:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Continuous Monitoring of Changes in Heart Rate during the Periprocedural Course of Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Wearable Device: A Prospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital.

出版信息

Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2023 Nov 15;63(11):526-534. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0093. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0093
PMID:37648537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10725827/
Abstract

This prospective observational study will evaluate the change in heart rate (HR) during the periprocedural course of carotid artery stenting (CAS) via continuous monitoring using a wearable device. The participants were recruited from our outpatient clinic between April 2020 and March 2023. They were instructed to continuously wear the device from the last outpatient visit before admission to the first outpatient visit after discharge. The changes in HR of interest throughout the periprocedural course of CAS were assessed. In addition, the Bland-Altman analysis was adopted to compare the HR measurement made by the wearable device during CAS with that made by the electrocardiogram (ECG). A total of 12 patients who underwent CAS were included in the final analysis. The time-series analysis revealed that a percentage change in HR decrease occurred on day 1 following CAS and that the most significant HR decrease rate was 12.1% on day 4 following CAS. In comparing the measurements made by the wearable device and ECG, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed the accuracy of the wearable device with a bias of -1.12 beats per minute (bpm) and a precision of 3.16 bpm. Continuous HR monitoring using the wearable device indicated that the decrease in HR following CAS could persist much longer than previously reported, providing us with unique insights into the physiology of carotid sinus baroreceptors.

摘要

这项前瞻性观察研究将通过可穿戴设备对颈动脉支架置入术 (CAS) 围手术期的心率 (HR) 变化进行连续监测。参与者是 2020 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间从我们的门诊招募的。他们被指示从入院前的最后一次门诊就诊开始,到出院后的第一次门诊就诊期间,持续佩戴设备。评估了 CAS 围手术期 HR 的变化。此外,采用 Bland-Altman 分析比较了可穿戴设备在 CAS 期间和心电图 (ECG) 测量的 HR。共有 12 名接受 CAS 的患者纳入最终分析。时间序列分析显示,CAS 后第 1 天 HR 下降百分比发生变化,CAS 后第 4 天 HR 下降率最大,为 12.1%。在比较可穿戴设备和 ECG 的测量值时,Bland-Altman 分析显示可穿戴设备的准确性为 -1.12 次/分钟 (bpm) 的偏差和 3.16 bpm 的精度。使用可穿戴设备进行连续 HR 监测表明,CAS 后 HR 的下降可能持续时间比之前报道的更长,为我们提供了颈动脉窦压力感受器生理学的独特见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/2f7297e87b7d/1349-8029-63-0526-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/f8805c669703/1349-8029-63-0526-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/09f091719135/1349-8029-63-0526-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/2f7297e87b7d/1349-8029-63-0526-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/f8805c669703/1349-8029-63-0526-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/09f091719135/1349-8029-63-0526-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca6/10725827/2f7297e87b7d/1349-8029-63-0526-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Continuous Monitoring of Changes in Heart Rate during the Periprocedural Course of Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Wearable Device: A Prospective Observational Study.使用可穿戴设备连续监测颈动脉支架置入术围手术期心率变化:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2023 Nov 15;63(11):526-534. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0093. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
3
Long-Term Hemodynamic Effects After Carotid Artery Revascularization.颈动脉血运重建后的长期血流动力学效应。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 May;53(4):297-302. doi: 10.1177/1538574419828088. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术:随机试验的荟萃分析及多样性调整试验序贯分析
Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):172-84. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.262. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
5
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
6
The role of atropine in carotid stenting of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.外翻颈动脉内膜切除术(Eversion endarterectomy)后再发狭窄行颈动脉支架置入术中阿托品的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.117. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
Bilateral carotid angioplasty and stenting.双侧颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Mar;64(3):275-82. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20287.
8
Anesthetic type and risk of myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中颈动脉内膜切除术后的麻醉类型与心肌梗死风险
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):3-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Outcomes after carotid artery stenting in Medicare beneficiaries, 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年 Medicare 受益人的颈动脉支架置入术治疗结果。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72(3):276-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3638.
10
Periprocedural cilostazol treatment and restenosis after carotid artery stenting: the Retrospective Study of In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting (ReSISteR-CAS).经皮腔内颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术后的培哚普利奥治疗与再狭窄:颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的回顾性研究(ReSISteR-CAS)。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Apr;21(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review.用于测量术后患者预后的移动设备和可穿戴技术:一项系统评价
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 12;4(1):157. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00525-1.
2
The Rise of Wearable Devices during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.新冠疫情期间可穿戴设备的兴起:一项系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 28;21(17):5787. doi: 10.3390/s21175787.
3
Wearable devices for patient monitoring in the early postoperative period: a literature review.用于术后早期患者监测的可穿戴设备:文献综述
Mhealth. 2021 Jul 20;7:50. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-20-131. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessment of Prolonged Physiological and Behavioral Changes Associated With COVID-19 Infection.评估与 COVID-19 感染相关的长期生理和行为变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115959. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15959.
5
Wearable sensors enable personalized predictions of clinical laboratory measurements.可穿戴传感器可实现临床实验室测量的个性化预测。
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):1105-1112. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01339-0. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Objective activity tracking in spine surgery: a prospective feasibility study with a low-cost consumer grade wearable accelerometer.脊柱手术中的客观活动跟踪:使用低成本消费级可穿戴加速度计的前瞻性可行性研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61893-4.
7
Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Cognitive Function in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.老年人可改变的生活方式因素与认知功能:一项横断面观察性研究。
Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 24;10:401. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00401. eCollection 2019.
8
Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.消费者可穿戴心率测量在 24 小时内的准确性:个体内验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 11;7(3):e10828. doi: 10.2196/10828.
9
Use of a wrist-mounted device for continuous outpatient physiologic monitoring after transsphenoidal surgery: a pilot study.经蝶窦手术后使用腕戴式设备进行连续门诊生理监测:一项初步研究。
Pituitary. 2019 Apr;22(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s11102-019-00946-y.
10
Long-Term Hemodynamic Effects After Carotid Artery Revascularization.颈动脉血运重建后的长期血流动力学效应。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 May;53(4):297-302. doi: 10.1177/1538574419828088. Epub 2019 Feb 11.