• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际共识的解剖室质量系统(DRQS):德尔菲小组研究。

International consensus for a dissection room quality system (DRQS): A Delphi panel study.

机构信息

Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

MIFAS by GRECMIP (Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society), Merignac, France.

出版信息

Clin Anat. 2024 Jan;37(1):54-72. doi: 10.1002/ca.24086. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1002/ca.24086
PMID:37650536
Abstract

Dissection Rooms (DRs) are key facilities that allow teaching and research on human anatomy, where students and researchers work with human bodies to acquire, increase, or create new knowledge. Usually, DRs work with a Body Donation Program (BDP), where living donors bequeath their bodies for use in teaching and research after they expire. Despite DRs being part of universities worldwide, no common guidelines, regulations, or quality management systems (QMS) exist that could be applied to different countries. With that purpose in mind, we aimed to develop a QMS that could be applied to DRs globally, using a Delphi panel to achieve consensus about the items that should constitute the QMS. The panel was constituted by 20 anatomy professors from 20 different countries, and the 167 standards to create the rules or guidelines that constitute the QMS were divided in five categories: direction, body donation, students, instructors, and research. After two rounds of revisions, 150 standards were considered "essential" or "important" by more than 70% of the participants, thus being incorporated to the Dissection Room Quality System (DRQS). The results of this panel represent a minimum list of items of the DRQS for improving the functioning of DRs globally.

摘要

解剖室(DR)是允许进行人体解剖学教学和研究的关键设施,学生和研究人员在解剖室中使用人体来获取、增加或创造新知识。通常,解剖室与遗体捐赠计划(BDP)合作,在捐赠者去世后,将其遗体捐赠给教学和研究使用。尽管解剖室是世界范围内大学的一部分,但没有普遍适用的指南、规定或质量管理系统(QMS)可以应用于不同的国家。考虑到这一点,我们旨在开发一种可以在全球范围内应用于解剖室的 QMS,使用 Delphi 小组来就构成 QMS 的项目达成共识。该小组由来自 20 个不同国家的 20 名解剖学教授组成,创建规则或指南的 167 项标准被分为五个类别:方向、遗体捐赠、学生、教师和研究。经过两轮修订,超过 70%的参与者认为 150 项标准“必要”或“重要”,因此被纳入解剖室质量系统(DRQS)。该小组的结果代表了改善全球解剖室功能的 DRQS 的最低项目清单。

相似文献

1
International consensus for a dissection room quality system (DRQS): A Delphi panel study.国际共识的解剖室质量系统(DRQS):德尔菲小组研究。
Clin Anat. 2024 Jan;37(1):54-72. doi: 10.1002/ca.24086. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
Development of key interventions and quality indicators for the management of an adult potential donor after brain death: a RAND modified Delphi approach.脑死亡后成年潜在供体管理的关键干预措施及质量指标的制定:兰德改良德尔菲法
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3386-1.
3
Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response.改进医学德尔菲研究中的设计选择:以一项具有 100%应答率的示范性医师多轮小组研究为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01029-4.
4
The whole body donation program at the university of Bologna: A report based on the experience of one of the oldest university in Western world.博洛尼亚大学的整体器官捐献项目:基于西方最古老大学之一经验的报告。
Ann Anat. 2021 Mar;234:151660. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151660. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Body Donation, Teaching, and Research in Dissection Rooms in Spain in Times of Covid-19.西班牙新冠疫情期间的解剖室遗体捐献、教学和研究
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Sep;14(5):562-571. doi: 10.1002/ase.2093. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Consent and consensus-ethical perspectives on obtaining bodies for anatomical dissection.同意与共识——关于获取尸体进行解剖的伦理视角
Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):70-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.22651. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
7
An international consensus study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome diagnostic criteria using the Delphi method.应用德尔菲法的神经阻滞剂恶性综合征诊断标准的国际共识研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;72(9):1222-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06438. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
8
Minimum standards of clinical practice for physiotherapists working in critical care settings in Australia and New Zealand: A modified Delphi technique.澳大利亚和新西兰危重症护理环境中物理治疗师的临床实践最低标准:改良德尔菲技术。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;32(6):468-482. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2016.1145311. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Editor's Choice - Recommendations for Registry Data Collection for Revascularisations of Acute Limb Ischaemia: A Delphi Consensus from the International Consortium of Vascular Registries.编辑精选 - 急性肢体缺血血运重建注册数据采集建议:国际血管登记研究联合会的德尔菲共识。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;57(6):816-821. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project.区域麻醉有效记录的推荐意见:专家小组德尔菲共识项目。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 May;47(5):301-308. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103136. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study on the carbon footprint of bodies donated to science for sustainable medical education and research.一项关于捐赠给科学用于可持续医学教育和研究的尸体碳足迹的回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 19;12:1530121. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1530121. eCollection 2025.