• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014 - 2021年未提交给加拿大卫生部的新药的治疗价值:横断面研究。

Therapeutic value of new medicines not submitted to Health Canada 2014-2021: Cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Lexchin Joel

机构信息

Professor Emeritus, School of Health Policy and Management, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada; Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2023 Oct;136:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104901. Epub 2023 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104901
PMID:37651968
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether there has been a change in the number of therapeutically important new medicines not being introduced into the Canadian market in light of the December 2017 announcement of regulatory changes to lower Canadian prices.

METHODS

A list was compiled of medicines approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2014-2021 but not submitted to Health Canada. The therapeutic value of these medicines was assessed based on evaluations by two independent sources. If no evaluation was available, potential therapeutic value was determined based on the presence of one or more of three medicine characteristics. Interrupted time series was used to determine if there were changes in overall new medicine introductions and therapeutically important new medicines.

RESULTS

The FDA approved 364 new medicines of which 116 (31.9%) were not submitted to Health Canada. There was a decrease in overall annual number of submissions but that was not related to the announcement at the end of 2017. There was no change in the introduction of therapeutically important new medicines as a percent of all medicines not marketed in Canada but there was a decrease in the absolute number.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of therapeutically important medicines not being introduced into Canada is increasing but that is not related to the proposed price reforms.

摘要

目的

鉴于2017年12月宣布的降低加拿大药品价格的监管变化,研究未进入加拿大市场的具有重要治疗意义的新药数量是否发生了变化。

方法

编制一份2014年至2021年间美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准但未提交给加拿大卫生部的药品清单。这些药品的治疗价值基于两个独立来源的评估。如果没有评估结果,则根据三种药品特性中的一种或多种来确定潜在治疗价值。采用中断时间序列分析来确定新药总体引入量和具有重要治疗意义的新药是否有变化。

结果

FDA批准了364种新药,其中116种(31.9%)未提交给加拿大卫生部。每年提交的药品总数有所下降,但这与2017年底的公告无关。在未在加拿大上市的所有药品中,具有重要治疗意义的新药引入比例没有变化,但绝对数量有所下降。

结论

未引入加拿大的具有重要治疗意义的药品数量在增加,但这与拟议的价格改革无关。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic value of new medicines not submitted to Health Canada 2014-2021: Cross-sectional study.2014 - 2021年未提交给加拿大卫生部的新药的治疗价值:横断面研究。
Health Policy. 2023 Oct;136:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104901. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
2
Reforms to the patented medicine prices review board and the introduction of new drugs in Canada: An observational study.加拿大专利药品价格审查委员会改革与新药引入:一项观察性研究。
Health Policy. 2022 Oct;126(10):1018-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
Potential therapeutic value of new drugs approved in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.澳大利亚批准新药的潜在治疗价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2023 Apr;47(2):203-207. doi: 10.1071/AH22280.
4
New drug submissions in Canada and a comparison with the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency: Cross-sectional analysis.加拿大新药申报及其与美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局的比较:横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 15;18(6):e0286802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286802. eCollection 2023.
5
Use of priority and provisional approval pathways by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration in approving new medicines: a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚治疗商品管理局在批准新药方面使用优先和临时批准途径:一项横断面研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2022 Jun;46(3):309-315. doi: 10.1071/AH22008.
6
To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016.欧洲药品管理局和美国食品药品监督管理局对新活性物质(NASs)的审评结果一致性如何?基于2014年至2016年期间首次获批的NASs公开信息进行的比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e028677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028677.
7
Evaluating the impact of the single exit price policy on a basket of originator medicines in South Africa from 1999 to 2014 using a time series analysis.利用时间序列分析评估南非 1999 年至 2014 年单一出口价格政策对一篮子原研药品的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4403-8.
8
Regulatory review of novel therapeutics--comparison of three regulatory agencies.新型治疗药物的监管审查——三个监管机构的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2284-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1200223. Epub 2012 May 16.
9
The impact of proposed price regulations on new patented medicine launches in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大拟议价格管制对新专利药品上市的影响:回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2024 May 26;196(20):E691-E701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231485.
10
The effects of pricing policy on the prices and supply of low-cost medicines in Shandong, China: evidence from an interrupted time series analysis.中国山东药品价格政策对低价药价格和供应的影响:来自中断时间序列分析的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08746-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Fear of missing out: Drug availability in the United States vs Canada.错失恐惧:美国与加拿大的药物可及性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Dec;30(12):1349-1354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.12.1349.
2
The impact of proposed price regulations on new patented medicine launches in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大拟议价格管制对新专利药品上市的影响:回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2024 May 26;196(20):E691-E701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231485.